File No. 838.516/78.

Minister Blanchard to the Secretary of State .

No. 38.]

Sir: Referring to my cables of February 11 and February 13 with reference to the protest of this Legation in support of the protest of the Bank against the execution of the decrees of January 22 and 27, the one with reference to the emission of Treasury notes to the amount of two million gourdes, the other taking from the Bank the service of the Treasury of the State, I have the honor to enclose herewith copy and translation of a note8 from the director ad interim of the Bank, dated February 2, 1915, forwarding to this Legation copies of the protest of the Bank in this matter; and also copy and translation of another note8 under date of February 3, 1915, requesting the Legation to sustain the protest above mentioned.

[Page 513]

In pursuance of this request, this Legation on February 9 addressed a note to the Foreign Office, copy of which is herewith enclosed, protesting against the aforesaid measures as constituting a formal violation of the contract of the Bank and thus compromising American interests in that institution, as reported in my cable of February 11.

Under date of February 13, the Foreign Office addressed to this Legation a note in reply, in which, as you will observe, the Minister of Foreign Affairs lays particular stress, once again, upon the fact that the Bank is a French company, and on this ground repulses the protest of the Legation of the United States as not qualified, the French Minister being the only proper authority here to protest in favor of a French moral person.

After stating the above, the Minister adds as a matter of information for the Legation that the National Bank having violated Articles 12, 15 and 16 of its contract, having refused to the Haitian Government the financial cooperation which it had contracted to furnish, having removed from the Public Treasury a considerable amount, and obstinately retaining in its possession other sums belonging to the State, has added to the case of force majeure created by the European war a new case of force majeure which has placed the Government in the imperative obligation of providing for public administration and national existence.

He concludes, as you will further observe, by stating that if the Bank is not in accord with the Government, Article 24 of the contract provides a means of settling the differences by arbitration, and that the Haitian Government is ready to submit thereto the questions at issue.

The French Minister has received from the Department of Foreign Relations, in reply to his protest, a communication embodying the information furnished this Legation on the subject.

The Director of the Bank has been apprised of the contents of the note of the Department of Foreign Relations addressed to this Legation.

I have [etc.]

A. Bailly-Blanchard.
[Inclosure 1.]

Minister Blanchard to the Minister for Foreign Affairs .

The Banque Nationale de la République d’Haiti has brought to the attention of the Legation of the United States, as violating the rights of the Bank and the American interests therein engaged, the decrees of January 22 and 27, one with reference to the emission of Treasury notes up to the amount of two million gourdes, the other taking from the Bank the service of the Treasury of the State.

The Legation of the United States protests against these measures, which constitute a formal violation of the contract of the Bank and thus compromise the American interests in this institution.

[Page 514]
[Inclosure 2—Translation.]

The Minister for Foreign Affairs to Minister Blanchard .

Mr. Minister: The Legation of the United States made to my Department on February 9 a protest against the presidential decrees of January 22 and 27 which constitute, according to it, “a formal violation of the contract of the Bank and thus compromise the American interests in this institution.”

In response to this note, I see myself obliged again to call your attention to the fundamental fact that the contract which your Legation invokes to protest against the acts of the Haitian Government determines that the Bank is a company of French nationality. It is with this French company that the Haitian Government has contracted and it is absolutely incontestable, according to law, that this company could not cease to be French because of American interest therein.

My Department consequently rejects, as incompetent, the protest of the Legation of the United States presented for a French moral person, depending, in this respect, on the French Legation at Port au Prince.

The situation thus put in point, the protest thus set aside, the Department, always disposed not to refuse any useful information, does not hesitate to say to your excellency that the National Bank of the Republic of Haiti having violated Articles 12, 15 and 16 of its contract, having refused to the Government the financial cooperation which it engaged itself to furnish to it, having conveyed away from the public vault considerable amounts, and obstinately retaining in its possession other sums which belong to the State, has added to the case of force majeure already created by the European war a new case of force majeure which has placed the Haitian Government not only in the evident right, but in the imperative obligation itself to provide the service of the public administration and national existence.

The Government has the conviction to act in the fullness of its rights. If the Bank is not in accord with it, it has only to conform itself to Article 24 of its contract, which obliges the two parties to submit their differences to arbitration.

The Government of the Republic declares itself ready to submit to this arbitration the questions in debate.

Please accept [etc.],

Louis Borno.
  1. Not printed.
  2. Not printed.