File No. 817.00/2303.

Minister Hale to the Secretary of State.

No. 55]

Sir: In my despatch No. 53 of January 8 I transmitted a copy of the Foreign Office’s reply of January 5 to my note of December 30. The Foreign Office note was not perspicuous, and I thought other correspondence unnecessary. Upon reflection I changed my mind and have the honor to enclose copy of my note of this date in reply.

I have [etc.]

E. J. Hale.
[Inclosure.]

Minister Hale to the Minister for Foreign Affairs.

No. 63.]

Excellency: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your excellency’s note of January 5 in reply to mine of December 30, and to say that I have transmitted a copy thereof to the Department of State of my Government, confident that the appreciation of its friendly spirit in all that relates to the tranquillity and well-being of the Central American family, which your excellency has been pleased to express, will be very gratifying to it.

With respect to the disagreement between your excellency and the undersigned concerning the definition of a word, your excellency will be glad to know that that will be seen to be of no consequence when it is understood, as I now have the honor to inform your excellency, that the tone, form and words of my note of December 21, addressed to His Excellency the President, were those employed by my Government in its instruction to me. Consequently, when it declares that its representations were not presented in the form of a demand, it manifests the view which it entertains of its own act.

I avail [etc.]

E. J. Hale.