No. 336.
Mr. Foster to Mr. Evarts.

No. 657.]

Sir: In November last I received a letter from Professor John B. Dunbar, of Washburn College, Topeka, Kansas, asking me to ascertain from the Mexican foreign office whether the Pawnee tribe of Indians ever had a treaty or official relations with the government of Spain or Mexico.

I left with the Secretary of Foreign Affairs a copy of Professor Dunbar’s letter, with a request that he would favor me with any information in the government archives which would throw light upon the inquiries made. Under date of the first instant Mr. Vallarta has sent me notes of such information as was attainable in answer to the inquiries of Professor Dunbar. The notes also embrace historical data in reference to the various Indian tribes which formerly inhabited the old frontiers of Texas and New Mexico, and they may be found of interest to the Indian Bureau of our government. I therefore inclose a translation to enable you to send a copy thereof to the Department of the Interior should you think proper to do so.

I am, &c.,

JOHN W. FOSTER.
[Inclosure 1 in No. 657.]

Professor Dunbar to Mr. Foster.

Dear Sir: Would it be possible for you to ascertain from the State Department of the Mexican Government whether that government has ever had a treaty or official relations of any kind with the Pawnee Indians who formerly occupied this State and Nebraska? The Pawnees claim to have had some transactions with Mexico in the early part of this century and perhaps earlier. I am preparing a vocabulary and grammar of their language for publication by the government, and wish also to prepare a short historical sketch of them to accompany it.

If you could furnish me with any reliable data in the way indicated you will confer a great favor.

I am, &c.,

JOHN B. DUNBAR,
Professor of Greek, Washburn College.
[Inclosure 2 in No. 657.—Translation.]

Mr. Vallarta to Mr. Foster.

My Dear Sir: Complying with the desire which you were pleased to express to me in reference to the question contained in a letter of Prof. John B. Dunbar, concerning [Page 538] the relations of Mexico with the Pawnee tribes, I have the honor to transmit to yon certain data prepared from an examination of the best authorities.

I improve with pleasure this new opportunity to reiterate to you the sentiments of just appreciation with which I am, &c.,

J. L. VALLARTA.
[Inclosure to inclosure 2 in No. 657.]

Historical sketch of Indians.

The Indian tribes which are found at present established in the territory of the United States, or which originally inhabited our old frontiers, with those with which the Government of Mexico has had direct relations, are the following:

I.
The Cados, who inhabited the northeast of Nacogdoches in the State of Texas. In February of the year 1822 two chiefs of this tribe came to Mexico, commissioned to congratulate the government and General Iturbide upon the independence of the Mexican nation.
II.
The Comanches of Texas. In January, 1823, a chief named Guonigne presented himself in Mexico, in company with others of his nation, and negotiated an alliance with the Mexican empire.
III.
The Cherokees (Chiroquis) of Louisiana. In January, 1823, certain chiefs of this nation, named Richard Fielding, or Fields (half-breed), and X. Bowles came to Mexico, to whom the Mexican José Antonio Mexia served as interpreter, asking for lands upon which to establish themselves.
IV.
The Sahnanos, Creeks (Criques), Kickapoos, Quicapus, and Corhates, established to the north of Nacogdoches, had friendly relations with Mexico from 1827 to 1834. In 1827 certain chiefs made a contract with General Bustamante.
V.
The Seminoles, Kickapoos, and Muscogees (Muscogos), headed by Mountain Cat (Gato del Monte), Sun Set (Bajodel Sol), and other chiefs, made an agreement with the government of General Arista in the year 1850.
VI.
The Kickapoos sent a mission to Mexico in 1885 to congratulate Maximilian. They afterwards solicited from the government of Mr. Juarez, and were assigned, lands upon which to establish themselves in Santa Rosa, Coahuila.

The tribes of the United States which formerly had direct relations with the Government of New Spain, were:

I.
The Olibas or Olipas, “who inhabited the country between Florida and Tampico.” They were brought under the government of Panuco about the middle of the sixteenth century by the priest Andres de Olmos. They established themselves at a place situated close to the sea, at 23° 12ʹ north latitude and 276° 20ʹ west longitude from the meridian of Teneriffe. These Indians, who have disappeared completely, gave their name to the State of Tamaulipas (Tam), place (olipas), of the Olibas.
II.
The Apalaches of Eastern Florida, who, after the cession of that province to the United States by the treaty of the 22d of February, 1819, were transported to the plains of the river Chachalacos, eight leagues to the north of the present city of Vera Cruz, where they founded the town of San Carlos, and their descendants still exist.

The most ancient residence of the Pawnee tribes is in the region situated on the banks of the Missouri River, between 43° and 45° north latitude. They are located there by the designers of the charts made in the seventeenth century, corroborated by information furnished by the French of Illinois and Louisiana. The great distance which separates these territories from the town of San Gerónimo, of the Tahos, which was the most northern establishment of the Kingdom of New Mexico, and from the settlement of Nacogdoches, which was the most eastern of the province of Texas, as well as the intermediate location, on one side, of the Yuta and the Apache herdsmen, and on the other side, of the Arkansas (Arcansacs) and other tribes of Old Louisiana, are motives for believing that if, at any time, relations existed with the Pawnees (Pawnis), they were of very little importance, and were probably confined to the contact which certain cattle-herders of New Mexico, drawn in that direction by the spirit of adventure, or favored by the friendship of the Yuta and Apache herdsmen, may have had with them. Nevertheless, it may have been that certain Pawnees have separately traded or bartered with Mexicans of Tahos, since Gregg, who surely had reasons for knowing, says, in reference to the Pawnees, that in his time they had their principal seat on the tributary of the river Nebraska or Platte, called Loup Fork or Wolf River, and that certain chiefs of that tribe wandered on foot over the whole plain, frequently as far as the (what then was) frontier of Mexico.

It might have been also that the Pawnees maintained good relations with the Spanish emigrants from Louisiana, who founded the town of Nacogdoches about the year 1778, but of this there is no evidence.

The ancient chronicles referring to New Mexico indicate something that might be translated in the meaning of the traditions to which the letter of Mr. Dunbar alludes; [Page 539] but those chronicles refer to events which took place at the end of the sixteenth century and the beginning of the seventeenth, notably referring to the entrance of the conqueror Juan de Oñate, in the year 1599, and it would be very strange if the Pawnees should remember events of a time so remote. Notwithstanding this opinion, the following is what the priest Geronimo de Zárate Salmeron states is his “relation of all things which have been seen and known in New Mexico, as well by sea as by land, from the year 1538 to 1626”:

§76. “In a glance which our men cast to the east they saw in a band 5,000 Indians all ready for war in march toward the north. These Indians are of the nation of Arkansaws (Ercansaque), who live a hundred leagues from New Mexico towards the northeast, and are mortal enemies of the Xindanes (Tintong and Great-Tans) of the hunters or Quiyiras.”

§108. * * * “the Arkansaws (Ercansaques) inhabit that section of country which, at forty-six degrees of north latitude and one hundred and sixty-two of longitude, extends obliquely to the shelter formed by certain mountain ridges to a river, the Nebraska or Platte River, which flows northeast-southeast, and incorporates with another (the Missouri?), which runs into the Mississippi. They form a part of the Pawnees (Pauanas?) (Pawnees?), and are subject to the French of Louisiana.”

This is the information which, for the present, can be communicated to Mr. Dunbar, of whose request note has been taken, in order that in the future other facts may be found which may interest the object of his investigations.