Roosevelt Papers

The Secretary of State to the President

Memorandum for the President:

Since our conversation this afternoon1 in regard to the St. Pierre-Miquelon seizure by the Free French and its possible consequence, I have carefully reviewed the record, including some despatches that [Page 382] came in during the afternoon. It is a mess beyond question and one for which this Government was in no remote sense responsible.

Hereto attached is a somewhat detailed memorandum covering the entire matter as prepared and agreed to by all of the appropriate members of the European Division. I think it very important that you read this so as to get an up-to-date perspective clearly set forth.

The repercussions, in my opinion, are going to be much greater than one would ordinarily suppose. For example, the following is a quotation from a cable giving the conversation between Darlan and the Marshal with Admiral Leahy:

“Darlan then referred to the St. Pierre-Miquelon incident and said that Germany has already used the seizure of those islands by de Gaulle as an argument for the entry of Axis troops into Africa in order that it may be protected against a similar invasion.”2

This is just the beginning of ominous and serious developments which, in my opinion, will occur. Our British friends seem to believe that the body of the entire people of France is strongly behind de Gaulle,3 whereas according to all of my information and that of my associates, some 95 percent of the entire French people are anti-Hitler whereas more than 95 percent of this latter number are not de Gaullists and would not follow him. This fact leads straight to our plans about North Africa and our omission of de Gaulle’s cooperation in that connection. The developments revolving around the Vichy-North African situation and those revolving around the South American and Rio Conference situation are calculated to be very materially affected to our disadvantage if the fact goes out to the world that the British Government was really behind this movement and we abandon our own policies without serious protest, et cetera, et cetera. This may also seriously affect the question of the French naval units in Martinique by giving Robert a chance to pronounce our agreement null and void.

While, of course, I do not know yet just how agreeable the French will be in working this matter out in an amicable manner, provided Churchill would be disposed to talk with you, or rather to let you talk with him, about the necessity from our standpoint to work out the matter and announce to the general public that nobody is censurable and that the matter came up on account of confusions and [Page 383] misunderstanding as to the complications in this Hemisphere with respect to such action.

C. H.
[Enclosure]

Memorandum Prepared in the Department of State

Memorandum

The first suggestion that the Free French forces were interested in St. Pierre-Miquelon was communicated to this Government on December 15, 1941. On that day the American Minister to Canada received, at the request of the Chief of the Canadian Naval Staff, Admiral Muselier of the Free French naval forces.4 Admiral Muselier said that he had in his possession orders from General De Gaulle which would enable him to land forces in St. Pierre-Miquelon and take over the islands. Admiral Muselier added, however, that he was not going to act until he was sure that this proposed action was agreeable to the Governments of Canada, Newfoundland and the United States. The Admiral intimated that his proposed action in the islands had the approval of the British Government. The Admiral requested an expression of the American Government’s views in the matter. In the same conversation he discussed the French islands in the West Indies without, however, asking for an indication of our views. After referring to the admitted difficulties which existed there and granting that from the standpoint of the United States some action might have to be taken, he stated that both General De Gaulle and he feel that it would have a most unfortunate effect upon public opinion in France, in both occupied and unoccupied, if the United States Government had to take over these islands.

On the night of December 15 a member of the British Embassy informed the Department in strict confidence of a telegram from the Foreign Office. This telegram referred to conversations which had been in progress at various times since November 3 between the American and the Canadian Governments concerning the radio station at St. Pierre and a proposal of the Canadian Government to send civilian personnel to the island to control all outward messages from the radio station to prevent information from being sent out concerning ship movements. The telegram from the Foreign Office stated in effect that Prime Minister Churchill felt that it would be desirable for Free French forces to land and control this radio station rather than for [Page 384] the Canadian Government to take action in what might be an embarrassing political situation. The telegram continued that no action would, however, be taken unless the consent of the American and Canadian Governments were obtained.

After consultation with the President the Canadian Counselor and the American Minister in Ottawa were informed as follows: The President did not favor a policy whereby the Free French would be permitted to take action in the St. Pierre-Miquelon situation. In this specific instance this was the issue at stake but if subsequently the question should arise as to Free French action as regards other French territorial posessions in this Hemisphere, the attitude of this Government would undoubtedly be the same, particularly in view of the recent exchanges between Washington and Vichy and the commitments of this Government with respect to the other American Republics.

The American Minister was further informed by the Department that the President entirely approved the general tenor of the original Canadian idea which had been that persuasion should in the first instance be used but that if such means failed to establish Canadian control of the radio station, recourse might then be had to force. It was made clear in these conversations that it was the understanding of this Government that control of the radio station was the objective of the Canadian authorities.

This question was also discussed in the same sense with the British Embassy and it was added that since the British Government as well as the American Government is interested in the maintenance of relations with the Vichy Government certainly any action by the Free French in moving into French possessions in this continent with the approval of the British and the American Governments would be bound to be detrimental.

On December 16 Admiral Muselier was orally informed of the views of this Government. Admiral Muselier expressed bitter disappointment and said that he felt that the American Government was making a mistake but that he would accept this decision.

On December 22 the Counselor of the Canadian Legation in Washington telephoned to inform the Department under instructions from his Government that the British Government did not “go along” with the policy suggested in the American-Canadian discussions for action by Canada to supervise the radio station of St. Pierre; consequently the Canadian Government due to Empire policy as laid down by the British Government was not going ahead with the proposed action in that regard. Mr. Wrong added that he could state, however, that any action by the Free French forces had been “called off”.

On December 22 the Canadian Under Secretary of State of External Affairs referred to the decisions to do nothing for the present. [Page 385] Mr. Robertson, however, placed more emphasis on the temporary nature of this decision than had Mr. Wrong and intimated that the whole question was on a twenty-four hour basis. Subsequently the Prime Minister, Mr. Mackenzie King informed Mr. Moffat that he agreed with the decision of the United States Government in regard to St. Pierre-Miquelon and felt that any slight advantages of action by the Free French there were outweighed by the bigger issue involved which he said he understood.

On December 24 the Canadian Legation informed the Department of the landing of Admiral Muselier’s forces in St. Pierre-Miquelon and that this action had been taken without the prior knowledge or consent of the Canadian Government.

On December 25 Mr. Moffat reported from Ottawa that he had been told at the Department of External Affairs that the Canadian Government was “shocked and embarrassed by the action of Admiral Muselier in occupying St. Pierre-Miquelon”. Mr. Moffat’s telegram continued that when Muselier was recalled from Ottawa to London on December 18 he had, despite a natural disappointment, accepted the veto against occupying the islands and had asked for air transportation across the Atlantic; he was on his way to Newfoundland to take a bomber when the incident occurred. Mr. Moffat continued that the Canadians feel that Muselier’s action “was so close to a breach of faith that it cannot fail to embarrass their future relations with the Free French”. It was stated that Mr. Mackenzie King plans to discuss the subject in Washington upon his arrival around noon today.

On Christmas morning the French Ambassador asked for an appointment with the Secretary of State “to present an expression of the gravity with which the situation in St. Pierre would be viewed by his Government. He recalled that St. Pierre was under the administration of Admiral Robert with whom a re-affirmation of the agreement relating to the status quo of French possessions had just been concluded”.

The Free French delegate in Washington telephoned Christmas afternoon to say that he had learned of Muselier’s action only by radio and that he had been completely without any previous information that this step was contemplated by Admiral Muselier.

Christmas night Mr. Moffat telephoned to say that the Canadian Prime Minister was very embarrassed and had said that Canada was not responsible.5 Mr. Mackenzie King added that it had been decided that Canada would act to restore the status quo of the islands only upon specific request of the British and American Governments. He said Canada would prefer United States action rather than acting [Page 386] alone. Mr. Moffat had been further informed that Admiral Muselier had said he was acting under direct instructions from General De Gaulle.

The British Ambassador likewise told the Secretary of State that General De Gaulle had withdrawn the assurances he had given the British Government to the effect that no action would be taken when he had received reports from Admiral Muselier in Canada that the radio station was the object of concern to the Canadian Government.

  1. A memorandum by Savage (ante, p. 149) refers to a telephone conversation between Roosevelt and Hull on December 31, but there is no indication of what was said on the subject of St. Pierre and Miquelon.
  2. For text, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. ii, p. 503.
  3. On the preceding day (December 30) Churchill had made the following remark in his address to the Canadian Parliament:

    “Some Frenchmen there were who would not bow their knees and who like their General de Gaulle have continued to fight at the side of the Allies. They have been condemned to death by the men of Vichy but their names will be held and are being held in increasing respect by nine Frenchmen out of every ten throughout the once happy, smiling land of France”. (New York Times, December 31, 1941, p. 6)

    For Hull’s reaction to Churchill’s remarks at Ottawa, see Hull, vol. ii, p. 1133.

  4. For additional documentation on the problem of St. Pierre and Miquelon during the period surveyed in this memorandum, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. ii, pp. 546552.
  5. See ante, p. 377.