File 838.516/55.

Minister Blanchard to the Secretary of State.

No. 25.]

Sir: I have the honor to forward herewith copy and translation of a further communication received from the Department of Foreign Relations under date of December 28, with regard to the identity of the gold removed from the Bank on December 17 and which the Haitian Government contends is part of the retrait fund.

The information referred to in the last paragraph of the enclosed note verbale, according to the statement made to me by Mr. Borno, Minister of Foreign Relations, was received by him from Dr. Menos, Haitian Minister to Washington.

I have [etc.].

A. Bailly-Blanchard
.
[Page 379]
[Inclosure—Note verbale—Translation.]

The Department of Foreign Relations to Minister Blanchard.

The Department of Foreign Relations has the honor to inform the Legation of the United States that the juge d’instruction, O. Leger, having communicated to the Commissioner of the Government, for the purpose of preparing a charge, the documents in the case of the taking of the public funds perpetrated, December 17th, at the National Treasury of the Republic, the commissioner has presented to the Department of Justice a detailed report where he analyzed the examinations of the director and high employees of the bank, charged with the service of this Treasury. From these examinations it appears as follows:

Mr. Emanuel Dryfus, accountant, in charge of the special account of the withdrawal of paper money, declared to the juge d’instruction that the deposit of gold pledged to this withdrawal amounted, on November 30th last and until December 17th, to the sum of $907,800.20 (dollars gold).

On his side, Mr. Henri Desrue, director of the bank, declared to the juge d’instruction that of the deposit in question there remains at this time a difference which amounts to $388,000 (dollars).

Comparing these two depositions of the director and accountant of this Bank which, one cannot hold in too close attention, does the service of the National Treasury, it follows with conclusive evidence that the sum embarked on the Machias on the 17th of December last, has been diverted or deducted from the funds devoted to the withdrawal of paper money, that is to say, from a fund which is the property not at all of the Bank, but of the Haitian State, and which could not therefore go out of the Haitian Treasury at Port au Prince except with the formal consent of the Haitian Government.

The Department of Foreign Relations, from the beginning has expressed to the Legation of the United States its absolute conviction that the good faith of the Department of State has been abused.

And so the Haitian Government has learned without any surprise that the Department of State has spontaneously decided in case its information should reveal to it the legitimateness of our rights, to cause the funds to be put back at Port au Prince in the cash of the Haitian Treasury intrusted to the National Bank of the Republic of Haiti.