No. 283.
Mr. Wurts to Mr. Evarts.

No. 700.]

Sir: Referring to my dispatch No. 699, of the 16th instant, I inclose to you herewith a copy and translation of a note from the Italian ministry of foreign affairs, by which the Government of the King signfies to the Government of the United States its formal intention to terminate on the 17th of September, 1878, the consular convention now existing between the two countries.

I have, &c.,

GEORGE W. WURTS.
[Page 463]
[Inclosure in No. 700.—Translation.]

Mr. Melegari to Mr. Evarts.

Sir: The consular conventions at present existing between Italy and foreign powers agree, in general, in declaring absolutely inviolable only the offices and archives of their respective consuls, thus leaving in every respect subject to the common law the houses inhabited by them.

The only exceptions to this rule are the convention in vigor with the United States of America and that with Belgium, which clearly admit the exemption of the consular dwellings also.

The existence of these two exceptions is sufficient, practically, to make it impossible to apply the general rule, because, in virtue of the clause contained in all the other consular conventions relating to the treatment accorded to the most favored nation, the consuls of the other states also have naturally the right to invoke for their own benefit the special exemption enjoyed in this country by the dwelling-houses of the consuls of the United States and of Belgium.

It is not necessary for me to use words to explain to you how such a state of things is in little harmony with the modern principles of international law, which principles have to take into consideration the progress of civilization and of the greatly extended guarantees sanctioned by modern laws for the protection of individual liberty and of the inviolability of domicile, and have then to leave open the way for the common law, reserving the privilege of exemption only to the dwellings of diplomatic agents, the true representatives of foreign sovereignty.

On the other hand, once that the principle is admitted of consular officers being liable to summons before the tribunals of the kingdom, to there answer for responsibilities contracted by them, and, to a certain point, also for offenses charged against them, it does not seem logical that to them should be granted, by means of this exemption, the way of evading for themselves and their effects the execution of the sentence.

The inconveniences and the difficulties that may arise from the practice of such a system have been especially shown in certain cases which have happened recently, which concerned your legation, and which, being still fresh in your memory, it would be superfluous to recall here.

It is desired now to find a remedy for this condition of things, and no other means of doing so has presented itself to the Government of the King except by the denunciation of the two conventions in which the immunity of the consular dwellings is stipulated.

As regards the convention with Belgium, it was denounced in February of this year, and will, therefore, cease to have effect next February.

It remains now to denounce that with the United States, which, having a duration of ten years, computed from the 17th day of September, 1868, on which day the ratifications were exchanged, would expire, except in the case of tacit renewal, on the 17th of September of next year.

To this end I hasten to signify, as I by this present do signify to you, Mr. Chargé d’Affaires, as the actual representative of the Government of the United States at Rome, the formal intention of the Government of the King to terminate on the 17th of September, 1878, the effects of the consular convention concluded at Washington on the 8th of February, 1868, and that in conformity with article 17 of the same convention.

In notifying you of this determination, I beg to add that the Government of the King is not only disposed but greatly desires to conclude, as soon as possible, with the Government of the United States a new convention upon the same subject, to go into operation upon the termination of the former, or even before, if thought advisable.

I feel confident that the new stipulation will not give rise to difficulty, as we are disposed to reproduce in general the tenor of the existing convention, except the words and dwellings of article 6, which are naturally to be suppressed, and whatever other special point which, as perhaps shown by past experience, might be benefited by being better regulated or more clearly defined.

I beg you, sir, to have the goodness to acknowledge the receipt of this communication, and I take pleasure in confirming to you, Mr. Chargé d’Affaires, the assurance of my most distinguished consideration.

MELEGARI.