740.5/9–550: Telegram
The Secretary of State to the Embassy in France
niact
1163. ReDeptel 1124 Sept 2 and Embtel 1157 Sept 5. In Schuman’s absence pls call on Pleven and inform him that we have given careful consideration to Fr views as conveyed to you by Schuman and in deference to their wishes we have refrained from notifying other NATO Govts (of course with exception of UK) of our preliminary thinking or of our intention to discuss creation of unified Force for Defense of Europe at forthcoming NATO Council mtg.
You shld inform him that we share his wish to avoid having NATO Council become a forum for airing of serious differences of opinion between Fr, UK and US. As Schuman pointed out, however, when he, Bevin and I have met in person we have usually been successful in reaching agreement even upon most difficult issues. In the present case, we fully understand the apprehensions of the French, particularly in respect to how western German manpower and economic potential may be employed. It is our hope and belief that on this and related problems we can reach conclusions which will not only contribute greatly to the strengthening of the North Atlantic position, but will do so in a way which will be of concrete assistance to Fr in dealing with the problem of their public opinion.
We continue to feel that this problem, which appears directly related to proposal set forth in para 5 of Fr memo of Aug 17 (Pleven will recall that this memo to US Govt was circulated by Fr directly to other NAT signatory Govts) is too important and urgent to permit indefinite postponement of discussion of at least broad principles among all NAT members. In fact, it seems to us almost inevitable that question will be raised by some member when Item IV or V of agenda proposed by NAT deputies is reached. Whether or not this happens it is important that Pleven clearly understand that while we have deferred to Fr desires on prior notification of other NAT Govts we must reserve right to raise question ourselves at Council mtg. As indicated above, our hope is that broadest possible agreement will emerge [Page 269] from tripartite talks and that Fr will consequently be prepared to take prominent and constructive part if discussion arises in Council.
Repeated London1 for Holmes info and to inform Brit of substance of Fr reaction and this reply.
- As 1233.↩