740.00119 Control (Japan)/11–945

The Acting Political Adviser in Japan (Atcheson) to the Secretary of State
No. 45

Sir: I have the honor to enclose a copy of a brief self-explanatory memorandum of identic date to General MacArthur recommending that action be taken, and suggesting the means by which it might be taken, to prevent present reactionary Diet members from standing for re-election and being returned to office.

Respectfully yours,

George Atcheson, Jr.
[Enclosure]
Memorandum by the Acting Political Adviser in Japan (Atcheson)

Memorandum for: Supreme Commander and Chief of Staff.

Subject: The Present Diet and the Forthcoming Elections.

Among the questions arising out of the forthcoming elections is whether there is any possibility that the elections will produce a Diet that is actually democratic in character as contrasted with the present reactionary body. We seriously fear that such possibility is very slight indeed, especially as the new political parties lack experience and will not have time to develop their organizations to the point of being in position to exert sufficient influence in the elections. The number and diversity of the new parties alone constitute strong obstacles [Page 845] against successful competition with well-intrenched and reactionary politicians.

We suggest that consideration be given to what means might be appropriately pursued toward insuring that the Diet not be returned to office. Interference with the elections is, of course, out of the question as a matter of principle. But there is ample justification under the Potsdam Declaration to inform Shidehara that the present Diet members are (Article 10) “obstacles to the revival and strengthening of democratic tendencies among the Japanese people” and should not, therefore, stand for re-election.

Most of the present Diet members, it is understood, are members of the Great Japan Political Association, which is an outgrowth of the Imperial Rule Assistance Association, and would also fall within the purview of the second sentence, section one, part III of the general initial policy directive: “Persons who have been active exponents of militarism and militant nationalism will be removed and excluded from public office and from any other position of public or substantial private responsibility.”

If this suggestion is approved, Shidehara might also be informed that there should be no publicity in carrying out the Supreme Commander’s oral instruction in this matter.

George Atcheson, Jr.