Notter File, Box 168: Stettinius Diary

Memorandum by the Under Secretary of State (Stettinius)1

restricted

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

I then told the group2 in the strictest confidence that Cadogan had received a cable from Churchill asking him to come to Quebec and that he had asked my advice and opinion on the matter, and whether, if he went, we would be offended. I reported that I had told him we would have no objection to his flying up and spending the evening there if he could come back the next day. There was considerable discussion as to whether we should suggest that the President ask Church ill not to call him up, but this was entirely inconclusive. The point of view was also expressed that this changed the entire character of the Quebec conference from one of a military nature to one of a political nature and it was very serious to be having a political conference without Stalin present. Incidentally I informed the group that the President had assured me that if the British called any political men to Quebec he would do likewise.3 (This was not done, Morgenthau being the only person called up although through special arrangements we did have Ambassador Atherton at Quebec, although he did not participate in any direct way at the meeting.)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Talks During the Day With the Secretary

Early in the day I had a discussion with the Secretary on the voting procedure and also on the question of Cadogan’s being ordered to Quebec. I also told him of the possibility that Eden was coming to Quebec. Mr. Hull made the same point which was made at the American meeting by Mr. Long, that changing the character of the meeting in a political direction, and probably discussing the future of Europe without Stalin being present was quite a serious matter. …

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

The Secretary thinks that it would be most unfortunate if Cadogan goes to Quebec, not only from the point of view of our Conversations at [Page 45] Dumbarton but that it would throw that conference into a discussion of general diplomatic and political affairs. He asked me to do everything in my power to keep him from going.

Discussion During the Day With Cadogan

I talked privately with Cadogan and Jebb in the early afternoon … [Cadogan] inquired if Mr. Hull had heard from the President about going to Quebec and I told him he had not. …

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Later in the afternoon I had another private talk with him on the question of his going to Quebec. He immediately prepared a cable to his Prime Minister saying that Mr. Hull felt it would be a mistake for him to go as it would arouse all types of speculation in the press in this country. He said in the cable that if the Prime Minister felt keenly about it he hoped he would discuss it with the President. Cadogan handed me the wire and I suggested that he take out the word “terrific”. He had originally used the expression that Hull thought it would be a terrific mistake.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

  1. In the form of a daily record pertaining to Stettinius’ activities in Washington during the Dumbarton Oaks conversations. See ante, p. 22, fn. 1. Cf. Cadogan, p. 664.
  2. i.e., the United States delegation to the Dumbarton Oaks conversations.
  3. See ante, p. 38.