740.0011 P.W./8–2944
The Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Secretary of State
My Dear Mr. Secretary: The Joint Chiefs of Staff have considered the views of the British Chiefs of Staff regarding a request by the French Committee of National Liberation that the French should take a more active part in the war against Japan as set out in the enclosure.1
Indo-China is in the China theater of war, and therefore is an area
of United States strategic responsibility. The question of the
boundaries of the Southeast Asia Command were discussed at Sextant
and while no affirmative action was taken, the discussion indicated
that the President and the United States Chiefs of Staff were in
general agreement with the views expressed by the
Generalissimo,2 as follows:
Admiral Mountbatten was willing to accept the suggestion of the Generalissimo in so far as the boundaries were concerned but objected to the political commissions.
It would seem that in view of our arrangements with the Dutch relative to the Dutch East Indies, and of our impending conversations with the Portuguese concerning Timor, we should recognize, in so far [Page 253] as they are consistent with our national policies, the French desires concerning Indo-China. The extent and timing of such arrangements should be under continuing examination with the view of best serving our over-all interests.
The Joint Chiefs of Staff, from a military point of view, concur with the British views set forth in the enclosure except that they believe French participation in the planning of political warfare (paragraph 2 (iv) of the enclosure) should be restricted to the area of the Southeast Asia Command.4
Sincerely yours,
Admiral, U.S. Navy
Chief of Staff to the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy
- Concerning the enclosure, C.C.S. 644, see ante, p. 248, fn. 2.↩
- Chiang Kai-shek.↩
- See Foreign Relations, The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943, p. 392.↩
- The text of this letter was communicated to the British authorities in C.C.S. 644/1, August 30, 1944. There was no further action on the C.C.S. 644 series until after the Second Quebec Conference.↩