740.0011 European War 1939/31526¼
Memorandum by the Secretary of State
Memorandum of Conversation
Subject: Danish Request for Statement From the President
Participants: | Secretary of State Hull and the Minister of Denmark, Mr. Henrik de Kauffmann |
The Minister of Denmark called at his request. He said it meant a great deal to his people to receive encouragement just now and especially such encouragement as would be given by a brief statement that the President and Mr. Churchill might together or individually put out. He handed me a copy of a draft which he said he gave to the President yesterday (copy attached). I showed every interest in the situation and said that he had fully presented the idea to the President, that the matter is perfectly simple and calls for no conference between the President and myself, and that the President himself will decide whether or not to put it out and that if he does not do so, the [Page 1253] matter will have to remain in abeyance until later when it could be revived on some suitable occasion.1
The Minister was greatly appreciative of what I had said on this same subject during the past three days.2
- Concerning other conversations on this subject which Kauffmann had with officers of the Department of State while Churchill was in Washington, see Foreign Relations, 1943, vol. ii, pp. 10–11, 13. Hull was informed on September 10, 1943, that at Roosevelt’s suggestion Kauffmann had also discussed the matter of a statement with Cadogan (859.00/1068). No indication has been found that Roosevelt discussed this subject with Churchill, and Hull’s recommendations were not forwarded to Roosevelt until September 15, 1943, after Churchill had left the United States. See Foreign Relations, 1943, vol. ii, pp. 14–15.↩
- The reference is to Hull’s statement to a press and radio news conference on September 2, 1943, and to his letter of that date to Kauffmann, which was released to the press. See Department of State Bulletin, vol. ix, September 4, 1943, pp. 152–153; Foreign Relations, 1943, vol. ii, p. 10.↩