Hopkins Papers

The Secretary of the British Chiefs of Staff (Hollis) to the President’s Special Assistant (Hopkins)

secret

Dear Mr. Hopkins: At a meeting between General Moore of the U. S. War Department and General Macready (Assistant Chief of the Imperial General Staff), the procedure for allocating equipment to Allies, whether under Lend-Lease or otherwise, was discussed.

2.
I attach a copy of General Macready’s report of this meeting. As this matter has a political as well as a military aspect, I thought it right to let you see the arrangements proposed by General Moore and General Macready.
3.
You will see that in the final paragraph it is proposed that the procedure outlined should be agreed by the highest U.S. and British authorities, and that subsequently the interested parties should be notified and asked to comply with these arrangements forthwith.
4.
I hope I am right in addressing this matter to you.

Yours sincerely,

L. C. Hollis
[Attachment]
secret

Allocation of Finished Military Equipment to Allies

At a meeting with General Moore of the U.S. War Department to-day, we discussed the procedure for allocating equipment to Allies whether under Lend-Lease or otherwise.

The situation arose from large demands by the Dutch for various types of equipment and we discovered that the Dutch are demanding equipment simultaneously from the Americans and from the United Kingdom and, incidentally, usually not providing very satisfactory data as a basis for the quantities asked for.

We finally came to the conclusion that if completed war equipment is to be allocated as it comes out of production on a proper operational basis, and if confusion arising from duplicate demands is to be avoided, the following procedure should be adopted:

1. The Americans and ourselves will each take certain of the Allied and friendly powers as their protégés, receive their requirements, and arrange for allocations of equipment to them.

[Page 350]

We agreed that the split should be as follows:

  • U.K.
    • All Empire countries including India.
    • Free French
    • Belgium
    • Poland
    • Czechoslovakia
    • Norway
    • Greece
    • Yugoslavia
    • Egypt
    • Dutch East Indies
    • Turkey
    • Russia* (see also under U.S.)
  • U.S.
    • China
    • Latin America
    • Iceland
    • Russia* (see also under U.K.)

2. If the above division is agreed to, we envisage the procedure being as follows:—

(a)
The various Allies put in their total demands to London and Washington respectively, irrespective of whether the equipment is to be of English or American pattern.
(b)
In the case of demands for American equipment submitted to London, the War Office (or Air Ministry and Admiralty) notify the British Army Staff in Washington.
(c)
The British Army Staff obtain at the monthly meetings of the Joint Allocation Committee in Washington a bulk allocation for the British Empire and its protégés as regards all equipment manufactured in the U.S.A., whether it happens to have originated from Lend-Lease, British contracts or War Department appropriations.
(d)
This bulk allotment for the British Commonwealth and its protégés is notified to the War Office, London, and the War Office Allocation Committee allocates in detail to the various parts of the British Empire and to the Allies in accordance with the needs of the situation at the time. The same Committee will of course also allocate equipment of U.K. origin.
(e)
In the case of American equipment thus allocated, the War Office notify the British Army Staff, Washington, who inform the American War Department, who arrange with the necessary authorities to have the material transferred formally under Lend-Lease.
(f)
The Americans will similarly deal with the requirements of their protégés, allocating to them from the bulk U.S.A. allotment agreed at the Joint Washington Allocation Committee. In the case of British equipment being required either for U.S.A. or its protégés from the U.K., the demand will be passed to the War Office by the British Army Staff, Washington.

The main point of this arrangement is that we must, in the present circumstances, allocate according to the military situation and that [Page 351] we cannot issue equipment according to the origin of the order which produces it. It means, however, that although an allied country may have been told that it will obtain equipment under Lend-Lease arrangements, there can be no guarantee as to when the equipment thus promised will be issued. The deciding factor must be the military situation ruling at the time the equipment becomes available.

It is most important that this procedure should be agreed by the highest authorities on both sides and that all the interested parties should be notified and asked to comply with these arrangements forthwith.

J. N. Macready
  1. Issue of equipment to Russia is made in accordance with the protocol and is not subject to the normal allocation procedure. [Footnote in the source text.]
  2. Issue of equipment to Russia is made in accordance with the protocol and is not subject to the normal allocation procedure. [Footnote in the source text.]