American Legation,
The
Hague, March 31,
1910.
No. 331.]
[Inclosure—Translation.]
The Minister for Foreign
Affairs to Minister Beaupré.
Government of Foreign Affairs,
The Hague, March 31, 1910.
Sir: In your letter of the 18th November
last your excellency kindly inclosed a circular note containing two
proposals on the part of the Government of the United States, one
regarding the removal of difficulties of a constitutional nature
which prevent the ratification by the above-mentioned Government of
the convention for the establishment of an international court of
prize, the other looking to the end of investing the international
court of prize with the authority of the international court of
justice proposed at the second peace conference.
As to the first of these proposals, the Queen’s Government, attaching
great importance to the ratification by the United States of the
convention for the establishment of an international court of prize,
is quite ready to act in agreement with the above-mentioned
Government to find a solution of the difficulties. The Government of
the United States believes that the desired end will be attained if
the powers have the authority to treat the claims before the
international court of prize as simple requests for indemnity
following capture, and not as appeals from the decisions of the
national courts of prize. For this purpose, the Government of the
United States proposes to insert a reservation in the act of
ratification of the above-mentioned convention.
The Government of the Netherlands, desirous of obtaining the esteemed
concurrence of the United States in the convention of London, after
a careful examination of the proposal, desires to express the
opinion that this procedure would not indicate precisely enough the
modifications introduced in the existing provisions of the
convention relating to the establishment of an international court
of prize. For this reason, the conclusion of an additional
convention appears preferable.
The Government of the Queen, therefore, is in accord with the
suggestion, expressed by several other powers, of submitting the
preparation of an additional convention to a committee composed of
representatives of the four powers who assumed the initiative of the
court of prize—namely, Germany, the United States, France, and Great
Britain.
As to the second proposal of the Government of the United States
relating to a court of arbitral justice, the Government of the Queen
fears that an attempt to carry into effect this proposal
concurrently with the first will cause regrettable delays in the
ratification of the prize convention; on the other hand, there
appears to be nothing to prevent a preliminary examination of this
proposal by the above-mentioned committee, the result of which
examination to serve as a basis for an exchange of ulterior views on
the question.
Accept, etc.,
R. de Marees van
Swinderen.