Mr. White to Mr. Hay
Berlin, March 10, 1900.
Sir: Referring to previous correspondence, I have the honor to report that paragraphs 1, 2, and 14 a-d of the committee’s recommendation passed its second reading last evening in the Reichstag: paragraph 1, referring to inspection before and after slaughtering, unanimously; paragraph 2, referring to freedom from inspection of animals slaughtered for houseeold consumption of the owner, by 209 [Page 501] votes to 75, and paragraph 14a, prohibiting imports of meats after December 31, 1903, with conditional arrangements for imports until that date, and also paragraphs 14a-d, by a vote of 168 to 99, two members not voting.
It thus appears that the majority for the measure presented by the committee is, in the main body of the Parliament, decisive—indeed, overwhelming. If passed by the Parliament on the third reading, as it unquestionably will be, it must go to the Bundesrath.
As you are aware, the proposal made by the Government was comparatively moderate; this reported by the committee and passed by so overwhelming a vote is exceedingly drastic—so much so that the Government has caused it to be understood all along that it would be impossible to accept the recommendations of the Reichstag’s committee, even if they should be passed by the Reichstag.
But there appears lately to have been some lukewarmness in Government opposition to the measure as reported and passed. During the debate which has been going on for three days and which has now been ended as above, the representatives of the Government, Count Posadowsky and the Imperial chancellor, Prince Hohenlohe, expressed themselves against the measure; but the former did so in such a way that about half the time he secured the applause of the supporters of the measure, and the other half the applause of its opponents. He simply took the ground that the original proposal of the Government for a fair inspection was better, and that the development of the cattle-raising interest should be provided for by legislation distinctly directed to that purpose; but he appealed to the majorty for delay in vain. Prince Hohenlohe simply expressed an objection to the bill without going into any earnest line of argument or indicating what the course of the Government was likely to be.
During the debate the representatives of the land-owning interest gave various indications that they will support the navy bill and the other measures of the Government only on condition that the committee’s report on meat inspection be adopted.
Earnestly as the minister, Count Posadowsky, deprecated any view of the whole matter save from the sanitary standpoint, it constantly came out in the debates that protection to the agricultural interest is the first object of the majority.
It has been generally understood here for some time past that the measure in the form in which it is now passed will not be accepted by the Bundesrath. Private indications which I have myself gathered have been in that direction. I still think the chances are in favor of the Bundesrath rejecting the measure as voted, and going back to the Government proposals for meat inspection; but I am not so confident of this as I was some days ago. It seems clear that to have any working majority at all, the Government must yield to this overwhelming majority against them on this question. The heart of the Emperor is set on passing the navy bill, and without the support of the main body of those demanding this meat inspection bill as now passed by the Parliament, the navy bill can not be made a law. Under these circumstances, while it is possible that the Government may insist on going back to its original proposal, it seems to me not unlikely that some compromise not quite so drastic as the law now voted may be agreed upon.
Last night, after the debate was closed, I met a very important [Page 502] member of the Government who is inclined to moderate measures, and he insisted that the bill as it has passed the Reichstag must be modified—that it can not become a law; but I can not say that I regard his utterance as conclusive. I shall watch the proceedings carefully, and keep you advised as to the progress of events. As to interference here, I have thought it best to abstain carefully from any appearance of trying to influence legislation. Of course, what has been recently stated in the newspapers, namely, that I had uttered threats of retaliation here against the Government in case the law be passed, is without foundation. I have simply, when in conversation with trustworthy men of influence, stated what I conceived to be the facts of the situation, allowing them to draw their own inferences, and unless I receive instructions from the Department to the contrary, it seems to me best to continue this course. My hope is in the sober second thought, when the opposition from the manufacturing and shipping interests, the artisan class, and the mass of the people at large who are not directly interested in agricultural industry, shall be brought to bear upon the Bundesrath. Bremen and Hamburg have already spoken strongly on the subject, both in the Reichstag and through the press; other utterances are coming in, so that we may hope on the whole that the Bundesrath will either stop the measure, or essentially modify it.
I inclose three copies of the “Norddeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung,” containing proceedings of the Reichstag above referred to, with partial translations.
I am, etc.,