205. Despatch From the Ambassador in Vietnam (Durbrow) to the Department of State1

No. 157

REF

  • Embtel 802, Oct. 15, 19602

SUBJECT

  • Approach to President Diem on Suggested Political Actions

Attached as enclosure 1 is the English text of a memorandum on suggested political actions, a French translation of which was read and then handed to President Diem by Ambassador Durbrow on October 14, 1960. The French translation which was left with President Diem was classified ‘Top Secret” for the purpose of impressing Diem. For United States’ purposes, however, we consider the classification of both the English and French texts to be Secret.

Attached as enclosure 2 is the English text of notes on the suggested transfer of Ngo Dinh Nhu and Dr. Tran Kim Tuyen, a French translation of which was read to President Diem by Ambassador Durbrow at the same time.

President Diem’s reaction to this approach was described in our telegram No. 802, October 15, 1960.

For the Ambassador:
Joseph A. Mendenhall
Counselor of Embassy for Political Affairs

Enclosure 1

ENGLISH TEXT OF MEMORANDUM HANDED TO PRESIDENT DIEM

Mr. President, in your struggle for survival against the Viet Cong, you have taken many wise steps with respect to the security forces of the Government, and I understand that you are in the process of setting up a national Internal Security Council and a centralized intelligence agency as important and necessary additional steps toward giving effective guidance to and making maximum use of the security forces. We have recognized the increased security threat to [Page 599] your Government and the additional needs of your security forces. We have shown this recognition by the comprehensive program for training, equipping and arming the Civil Guard which I have just explained, by our furnishing special forces personnel needs of ARVN for the war against the guerrillas.

Our serious concern about the present situation is based, however, not only on the security threat posed by the Viet Cong, but also on what to us seems to be a decline in the popular political support of your Government brought on in part, of course, by Viet Cong intimidation. As your friend and supporter, Mr. President, I would like to have a frank and friendly talk with you on what seems to be the serious political situation confronting your Government. While I am aware that the matters I am raising deal primarily with internal affairs and, therefore, in ordinary circumstances would be no concern of mine, I would like with your permission and indulgence to talk to you frankly as a friend and try to be as helpful as I can by giving you the considered judgment of myself and some of my friends and your friends in Washington on what we hope would be appropriate measures to assist you in this present crucial situation.

I believe that your speech to the National Assembly on October 3,3 in which you stated that your Government has decided to reorganize certain of its institutions and to rationalize and simplify its working methods, indicates that we may be thinking to some extent at least along the same lines.

I would like particularly to stress the desirability of actions to broaden and increase your popular support prior to the 1961 Presidential elections. It would seem to me that some sort of a psychological shock effect would be helpful in order to take the initiative from the Communist propagandists as well as the non-Communist oppositionists, and to convince the population that your Government is taking effective political as well as security measures to deal with the present situation. It would appear that, unless fully effective steps are taken to reverse the present adverse political trend, your Government will face an increasingly difficult internal security situation. It is our carefully considered view that small or gradual moves are not adequate. To attain the desired effect, moves, major in scope and with extensive popular appeal, should be taken at once. Specific actions which we would suggest are as follows:

(1)

We suggest that you consider Cabinet changes as a necessary part of the effective moves needed to build up popular interest and support. One Cabinet change that we believe would be helpful would be the appointment of a full-time Minister of National Defense [Page 600] in order to permit you to devote your attention to developing over-all policies. To achieve maximum benefit it is suggested that you issue firm directives to assure that there is adherence to channels of command both up and down and that firm action be taken to eliminate any feeling that favoritism and political considerations enter into the promotion and assignment of personnel in the armed forces. Removal of this latter feeling is of great importance if the morale of the armed forces is not to be adversely affected during their mortal struggle against the Viet Cong.

We suggest that one or two members of the non-Communist opposition be given Cabinet posts in order to demonstrate to the people your desire for the establishment of national unity in the fight against the Viet Cong, and to weaken the criticisms of the opposition which have attracted considerable attention both in Saigon and abroad.

(2)
In rationalizing and simplifying the Government’s methods of work, we suggest you seek to find new methods to encourage your Cabinet Members to assume more responsibility rather than frequently submitting relatively minor matters to the Presidency for decision, thus allowing you more time to deal with basic policy matters; that the new national Internal Security Council be so constituted as to be the top level policy-making institution by having it meet frequently under your chairmanship for full discussion of all the major problems confronting the Government and proposed solutions thereto; and that the Government be operated as much as possible through well defined channels of authority from you in direct line to the department and agency heads properly concerned. Under this system Cabinet Ministers and agency heads can be held fully responsible for the operation of their departments and agencies, because of the full authority you have bestowed upon them. If a Cabinet Minister cannot fulfill his responsibilities under this system, we would then suggest that you replace him.
(3)
We would suggest that you consider altering the nature of the Can Lao Party from its present secret character to that of a normal political party which operates publicly, or even consider disbanding it.4 If the first alternative is adopted, various methods of convincing the population that the action has been taken might be used, such as party publication of a list of its members. The purpose of this action would be to eliminate the atmosphere of secrecy and fear and reduce the public suspicion of favoritism and corruption, which the Can Lao Party’s secret status has fostered according to many reports we have heard in and out of the Government.
(4)

We suggest that the National Assembly be authorized to investigate any department or agency of the Government. The Assembly should be authorized to conduct its investigations through public hearings and to publish the findings.5 This investigative authority for the Assembly would have a three-fold purpose: (a) to find some mechanism for dispelling through public investigation the persistent rumors about the Government and its personalities; (b) to provide the people with an avenue of recourse against arbitrary actions by certain Government officials; and (c) to assuage some of the non-Communist opposition to the Government.

We further suggest that the National Assembly be asked to establish requirements for the behavior of public servants.

We also suggest that the National Assembly be encouraged to take wider legislative initiative through the introduction of bills sponsored by individual Deputies or groups of Deputies, as well as to broaden area of public debate on all bills, whether Government-sponsored or introduced on a Deputy’s initiative.6

(5)
We suggest that you issue a warning that you may require every public official to make a declaration, for possible publication, listing his property and sources of income.
(6)

We suggest that you announce that, if the press will take a responsible role in policing itself, the controls exercised over it by the Government would be reduced. In this connection you might wish to consider the appointment of a committee, including representatives of the press and some members of the opposition, to draft a press code which the press would police. Within the framework of such a code the press could be a means of disseminating facts in order to reduce rumor-mongering against the Government, malicious or not, much of which stems from lack of information.

Providing timely and more ample information would also help to reduce anti-Government rumors. Means to accomplish this include freer access for the press to responsible members of the Government, and frequent public statements from the Presidency and fireside chats, transmitted to the people by radio, sound film, tape recordings, and through the press.6 The more these media are encouraged to reach the provinces, the more effective will they be in bringing the people closer to your Government by providing a means of transmitting ideas from one to the other.

(7)

We would like to suggest that you liberalize arrangements for Vietnamese wishing to study board, and for this purpose make more foreign exchange available.

We also suggest that you ease restrictions on the entry into and departure from Viet-Nam of Vietnamese nationals, in order to encourage Vietnamese well trained abroad to return and make their contribution to the development of their country.

(8)
We suggest that you consider some appropriate means by which villagers could elect at least some of their own officials. Such elections at the village level would be a means of associating the population with the Government and of eliminating arbitrary actions by local government officials by demonstrating to them that they will periodically be judged at the polls.
(9)
We suggest prompt adoption of the following measures for the enhancement of the Government’s support in rural areas:
(a)
Take action which will result in an increase in the price which peasants actually will receive for paddy before the new harvest.
(b)
Liberalize the terms of credit extended to the small rice farmers.
(c)
Continue to expand expenditures for agricultural development and diversification, particularly in the Mekong Delta area.
(d)
Institute a system of modest Government payment for all community development labor whether on agrovilles or an other Government projects.
(e)
Institute a system of limited subsidies to the inhabitants of agrovilles during the period of their readjustment. While the two situations are not completely comparable, the subsidies helped to bridge the period of adjustment for the settlers in the High Plateau. This should help to develop a favorable popular attitude toward the agrovilles by covering some of the expenses incurred in moving to and getting settled in the agrovilles.
(f)
Give appropriate and adequate compensation to the 2800 village health workers. These workers can serve as an important arm of the Government in establishing friendly relations with villagers.8 (g) Increase compensation paid to the Self Guard Youth.8
(10)
We suggest that as many of the steps recommended above as possible be announced dramatically to the public in your message to the people on October 26. We would envisage this message as a ringing effort to obtain the support of all non-Communist elements for your Government and to create national unity to win the fight against the Viet Cong.

[Page 603]

Enclosure 2

ENGLISH TEXT OF NOTES ON NGO DINH NHU AND DR. TRAN KIM TUYEN

In addition to these positive moves, again as a friend and most reluctantly, I feel that I should bring to your attention the increasing discontent among various strata of Vietnamese society with the role and alleged activities of your brother Ngo dinh Nhu and Madame Nhu. I repeat, I bring this matter up most reluctantly since I have respect for Mr. and Mrs. Nhu and I know how much you count on his advice and counsel. I know personally of the many contributions he has made to the success of your Government and I know that he is equally desirous with you to maintain the independence and integrity of Viet-Nam, as well as to advance the fine progress which has already made in your country. We have discussed this type of rumor before and I know that you have full confidence in your brother. Nevertheless, the position that Mr. and Mrs. Nhu hold in Viet-Nam has become the basis for a large amount of criticism and discontent against the Government. Unfortunately, whether based on fact or not, this criticism has reached the point that question is no longer whether these allegations are true or not. The fact that more and more people are believing them is seriously damaging the prestige of the Government. Unfortunately these rumors are also being used against your Government by Viet Cong propagandists in the countryside. Therefore, since it appears that these allegations are assuming a larger and larger importance in the public mind and are causing considerable discontent in the country, it might perhaps be advisable to give serious consideration to transferring Mr. Nhu to other duties. It has been suggested that he might be given an Ambassadorial assignment abroad. As you know, Mr. President, many Governments, including my own, have from time to time found it necessary to remove or transfer highly useful officials because of the adverse image they have created.

In this connection we have also heard much criticism of the role and activities of Dr. Tran Kim Tuyen, who, according to a growing number of reports, has come to represent a negative force in the minds of many. This too constitutes a basis for serious discontent and resentment against the Government. I personally know Dr. Tuyen and know of his abilities and contribution to the work of the Government, but because of the negative attitude about him which has developed, it might be well to consider his appointment to a post abroad.

[Page 604]

I repeat, as unfounded as these reports and rumors may be, it has often proven advantageous to other Governments to make transfers of this kind.

  1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, 751K.00/10–1560. Secret; Limit Distribution. Drafted by Mendenhall. Received in FE on October 21. Printed also in Department of Defense, United States-Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967, Book 10, pp. 1317–1322.
  2. Document 203.
  3. The text of this speech is in despatch 147 from Saigon, October 7. (Department of State, Central Files, 751K.11/10–760)
  4. Wood wrote the following marginal note at this point: “We advised against this/He [Diem] won’t.”
  5. Wood wrote the following marginal note at this point: “We advised agst/unlikely”
  6. At this point Wood commented, “New.”
  7. At this point Wood commented, “New.”
  8. At this point Wood commented, “New.”
  9. At this point Wood commented, “New.”