974.531/7–2051: Telegram
The Ambassador in Israel (Davis) to the Department of State
priority
67. For attention McGhee. Comment on Embtel 66, July 21 [20]1 also 60, July 202 and Deptel 49, July 19.3
[Page 788]Emb reiterates opinion expressed Embtel 33, July 134 to effect US can ill afford fail take forthright stand on Suez question. After reading UK draft resolution Deptel 49, feel we have much to gain and little to lose in ME and world by co-sponsorship and clearcut support resolution and important principles involved.
As to relations with this country, I believe we shld not delay in making clear our views re effect its actions have on chances for making peace in ME. Sharett has expressed his views bluntly but fairly, this time it is Israel’s surprise at our delay in taking definite stand on Suez question. Consider it important speak with equal candor on subject reftels. If Israel’s conduct so [in?] Huleh dispute and other matters is regarded as so unsatisfactory as to represent danger to effectiveness of UN in maintaining peace in ME, and color our whole attitude toward Israel, the time has come for plain speaking. If Dept concurs, I recommend I be instructed to leave govt here in no doubt re nature of and reasons for US displeasure. In this connection wld appreciate having urgently a carefully documented statement of points in Huleh and other matters in which US and UN regard Israel’s conduct unsatisfactory.
It is believed further that to tell Eban alone will not be sufficient. Such action wld probably lead to renewed habile self-justification and be only partially effective. Parallel action here is considered important if we are to achieve best results and protect standing of Emb. Believe my position here will be seriously prejudiced if I fail to give ample and clear forewarning before this govt again be confronted by adverse decisions re its actions in Huleh and other matters for which it has not prepared its public.
Wld appreciate Dept’s comments soonest since above considered very urgent in view reaction to development in Huleh question reported Embtel 60, July 20.