740.00119 FEAC/6–245
Report by the State-War-Navy Coordinating
Subcommittee for the Far East46
SWNCC 65/2
[Washington, 30 April 1945.]
Establishment of a Far Eastern Advisory
Commission
the problem
1. To determine:
-
a.
- The United States’ commitments to consultation with its
Allies in the war in the Pacific on questions connected with
the termination of hostilities and on conditions and
situations which may constitute a threat to peace and
security in Far Eastern areas.
-
b.
- The procedure to be followed in such consultation.
[Page 530]
facts bearing on the problem
2. The Declaration of the four nations at the Moscow Conference of 30
October 194347 states
that the four Governments:
“. . . . recognizing the necessity of ensuring a rapid and
orderly transition from war to peace and of establishing and
maintaining international peace and security with the least
diversion of the world’s human and economic resources for
armaments; jointly declare:
“1. That their united action, pledged for the prosecution of
the war against their respective enemies, will be continued
for the organization and maintenance of peace and
security.
“2. That those of them at war with a common enemy will act
together in all matters relating to the surrender and
disarmament of that enemy.
“3. That they will take all measures deemed by them to be
necessary to provide against any violation of the terms
imposed upon the enemy.
. . . . . . .
“5. That for the purpose of maintaining international peace
and security pending the re-establishment of law and order
and the inauguration of a system of general security, they
will consult with one another and as occasion requires with
other members of the United Nations with a view to joint
action on behalf of the community of nations.…”
3. The Cairo Declaration of 1 December 1943 issued by the President,
the Prime Minister and the Generalissimo48 states that
“The Three Great Allies are fighting this war to restrain and punish
the aggression of Japan.” Such a statement is clearly indicative of
the intention of these three countries to cooperate among themselves
on matters concerning Japan. The fact that the Soviet Union is not
today at war with Japan nor a party to the Cairo Declaration does
not detract from our present obligations thereunder in reference to
consultation or united action. The Declaration further states
certain objectives in reference to the treatment of Japan and
concludes that:
“With these objects in view the three
Allies, in harmony with those of the United Nations at war
with Japan, will continue to persevere in the serious and
prolonged operations necessary to procure the unconditional
surrender of Japan.”
4. The Teheran Declaration of 1 December 194349 by the
President, the Prime Minister and Marshal Stalin further indicates
the intention of this Government to consult with its Allies. It
reads:
“We shall seek the cooperation and active participation of
all nations, large and small, whose peoples in heart and
mind are dedicated,
[Page 531]
as are our own people, to the elimination of tyranny and
slavery, oppression and intolerance.”
5. None of the three Declarations referred to above specifies either
the time or method of procedure of such consultation as far as the
Far East is concerned.
6. Annex 2 of the Protocol signed at Moscow50
established a European Advisory Commission to study and make joint
recommendations to the three Governments upon European questions
connected with the termination of hostilities which the three
Governments considered appropriate to refer to it.
7. The Yalta Communiqué of February 12, 1945,51 states that
permanent machinery should be set up for regular consultation
between the Foreign Secretaries of the United States, the United
Kingdom and the Soviet Union and that they “will, therefore, meet as
often as may be necessary, probably about every three or four
months.”
8. Up to the present time no international body of any sort has been
provided to consider and recommend joint policies to be followed by
the interested nations and their agencies on questions arising from
the termination of hostilities and on conditions and situations
which may constitute a threat to peace and security in the Far
East.
9. The State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee, at its 17th meeting,
considered SWNCC 65/1, reached certain decisions in respect thereof,
and directed the Subcommittee for the Far East to revise SWNCC 65/1
in the light of the agreement reached at the meeting. The minutes of
this meeting included a draft of the Terms of Reference of a Far
Eastern Advisory Commission, prepared substantially in accordance
with such decisions.
Discussion
10. See Appendix “B”.
conclusions
11. It is concluded that:
-
a.
- This Government is committed to consultation with certain
of its Allies on matters relating to the surrender and
disarmament of Japan, and generally for the purpose of
maintaining international peace and security pending the
re-establishment of law and order and the inauguration of a
system of general security.
-
b.
- The best method of implementing some of the commitments of
this Government to consultation with its Allies on problems
of the Far East arising directly from the unconditional
surrender or total
[Page 532]
defeat of Japan is through the establishment of a Far
Eastern Advisory Commission with Terms of Reference as
stated in Appendix “A”.
recommendations
12. It is recommended that the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee:
-
a.
- Forward this document to the Joint Chiefs of Staff for an
expression of their views relative to the military
implications therein.
-
b.
- Consider Appendix “A” in the light of the views expressed
by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with a view to its approval
and use at the appropriate time in the establishment of a
Far Eastern Advisory Commission.52
[Enclosure 1]
Appendix “A”
The Far Eastern Advisory Commission Terms
of Reference
I. Establishment
The Governments of the . . . . . . hereby establish a Far Eastern
Advisory Commission composed of representatives of the
Participating Powers.
II. Functions
- A.
- The Far Eastern Advisory Commission shall be responsible
for making recommendations to the participating Governments:
- 1.
- On the instruments to carry out the terms imposed
upon Japan as a result of its unconditional
surrender or total defeat;
- 2.
- On the terms and provisions to be imposed on
Japan, including the measures necessary to ensure
the complete disarmament and subsequent effective
control of Japan;
- 3.
- On the machinery required to ensure the
fulfillment of these terms and provisions, including
the form of post-defeat military government;
and
- 4.
- On the measures needed for dealing with such
related subjects, arising out of the implementation
of the terms and provisions to be imposed on Japan,
as United Nations nationals who have been prisoners
of war, displaced persons and refugees, reparations
and restitution, war criminals, conduct of Japan’s
foreign relations, and removal of Japanese officials
and civilians from territory formerly under Japanese
control.
- B.
- The Commission shall have no authority with regard to the
conduct of military operations in prosecution of the present
war nor shall it make recommendations in regard to
territorial adjustments.
- C.
- The Commission shall perform such other duties as may be
assigned to it by agreement of the participating
Governments.
III. Other Methods of
Consultation
The establishment of the Commission shall not preclude the use of
other methods of consultation on Far Eastern issues by the
participating Governments.
IV. Composition
The Far Eastern Advisory Commission shall consist of one
representative of each of the states party to this agreement.
The membership of the Commission may be increased, as conditions
warrant, by the addition of representatives of other United
Nations in the Far East or having territories therein. Such
United Nations not members of the Commission shall be invited to
sit with the Commission when matters deemed by the Commission
primarily to affect the interests of such nations are under
consideration. In addition, the Commission shall provide for
full and adequate consultations, as occasion may require, with
representatives of the United Nations in the Far East or having
territories therein and not members of the Commission, in regard
to matters before the Commission which are of particular concern
to such nations. The chairmanship of the Commission shall be
held in rotation by representatives of the permanently
participating states.
V. Location and
Organization
The Far Eastern Advisory Commission shall have its headquarters
in Washington. It may meet at other places as the occasion
requires.
Each representative of the Commission may be accompanied by an
appropriate staff comprising both civilian and military
representation.
The Commission shall organize its secretariat, appoint such
committees as may be deemed advisable, and otherwise perfect its
organization and procedure.
VI. Termination
The Far Eastern Advisory Commission shall cease to function upon
notification by one of the constituent states of its desire to
terminate the agreement creating the Commission. Prior thereto,
the Commission shall cease to perform those functions which may
be absorbed by or transferred to any interim or permanent
security organization of which the participating Governments are
members.
[Page 534]
[Enclosure 2]
Appendix “B”
Discussion
- 1.
- In view of the statements in the Moscow, Cairo and other
declarations, to which this country is a party, this
Government is committed to consultation with other
interested Powers on matters concerning the unconditional
surrender or total defeat of Japan and the varied problems
arising in connection therewith. The increased tempo of
operational and political developments in the Far Eastern
area indicates the advisability of an early decision by this
Government on the procedure of consultation with our Allies
to be instituted at an appropriate time.
- 2.
- It is the considered position of the Department of State
that:
-
a.
- It is to the best interests of the United States
to share with its Allies the responsibility for
matters pertaining to the unconditional surrender of
Japan and the enforcement of the provisions
following surrender.
-
b.
- After the unconditional surrender of Japan, there
should be, as far as is practicable, Allied
representation in the army of occupation and in
military government by those countries which have
actively participated in the war against
Japan.
-
c.
- If the forces occupying Japan and the personnel of
the military government are restricted to those of
the United States, this Government would carry the
sole burden for enforcement of the terms of
surrender. Such a situation would force the United
States alone to bear whatever cost, effort and
responsibility were necessary for such control—a
condition which the American people might support
only grudgingly.
-
d.
- The Japanese must be forced to realize that the
greater part of the world, both Occidental and
Oriental, is against them. The use of Asiatic units
in the Allied occupation forces and in the military
government of Japan would be evidence of this fact
and would prevent the Japanese from interpreting the
war in the Pacific as a racial war and as one
designed to spread “white imperialism” throughout
Asia.
- 3.
- This Government is under moral obligation to give careful
consideration to the opinions of its Allies who have
suffered extensively as a result of the war in the Pacific.
For example, the contributions by China in the war against
Japan, extending over a period of eight years, entitle that
country, in the eyes of all peace-loving peoples, to a voice
in determining the policy to be applied to Japan.
- 4.
- It will be noted in Section II–B of the Terms of Reference
(Appendix “A”) that the Commission shall have no authority
with regard to the conduct of military operations in
prosecution of the present war nor shall it make
recommendation in regard to territorial adjustments.
[Page 535]
It is to be noted,
further, that the Terms of Reference (Appendix “A”) limit
the Commission to the consideration of problems arising
directly out of the unconditional surrender or total defeat
of Japan, unless other duties are specifically assigned it
by agreement of the participating Governments as provided in
Section II–C of the Terms of Reference. It is also
specifically limited to the making of recommendations to the
participating Governments. Furthermore, it is probable that
matters will arise with respect to the Pacific and Far
Eastern areas, even within the Japanese Empire, of such
vital importance to the security of the United States that
this Government will not wish to have them submitted to
discussion within the Commission; the Terms of Reference are
so limited as adequately to safeguard this
consideration.
- 5.
- The establishment of a Far Eastern Advisory Commission at
this time is complicated by the fact that as yet the
U.S.S.R. is not at war with Japan, but this fact does not
minimize the necessity for united action, in the application
of joint policies by those members of the United Nations now
at war with Japan, and for the continuation of joint action
in the application of those policies in the post-hostilities
era.
- 6.
- The Far Eastern Advisory Commission should be kept as
small as possible. The primary parties in interest at
present, from both a political and a military standpoint,
are the United States, the United Kingdom and China. It
would appear that, initially, the Far Eastern Advisory
Commission should be composed of representatives of the
United States, the United Kingdom, and China, and the Soviet
Union, if it enters the war against Japan. When matters are
being considered which affect the particular interests of
one or more of the governments of Australia, New Zealand,
the Netherlands, Canada, or France, representatives of these
governments should be invited to sit with the Commission and
collaborate in the determination of the particular question
under consideration.
- 7.
- It has been stated that the Department of State has no
intention of raising at present with our Allies the question
of the establishment of a Far Eastern Advisory Commission.
It desires, however, that an early decision be reached
within this Government as to the procedure of consultation
to be followed on problems resulting from the defeat of
Japan if such consultation should be requested by one of our
Allies actively participating in the war against
Japan.