740.0011 EW/7–345

No. 179
Memorandum by the Director of European Affairs (Matthews)

Memorandum of Conversation

Participants: Mr. John Balfour, British Minister Counselor;
Mr. H. Freeman Matthews, Director, Office of European Affairs.

Mr. Balfour called at his request, accompanied by Mr. Nevile Butler, whom I had not seen since leaving Malta last February. Mr. Balfour left with me the attached Aide-Mémoire containing a revision of the British suggestions for topics to be discussed at the forthcoming Berlin meeting. He likewise left with me the attached comments on the various items proposed. In addition to the latter, he said that the Foreign Office hoped that if the United States were in agreement, we might “take the lead” in presenting points 5 (a), (c) and (f), as well as point 3 (b). Mr. Balfour also asked if we could give some indication of our views with regard to the British suggestions and also an indication of who will be accompanying the President and Secretary of State.

I told Mr. Balfour that I could not of course comment upon the British list until the President and the new Secretary of State had had an opportunity to study the papers which we had tentatively prepared in the Department. I said, however, that as far as the thinking on my level was concerned, the British list of suggested topics in general ran somewhat parallel to our own thoughts. I remarked, however, on the omission of any item dealing with the situation in the Far East. I added that I noted that a number of the items on the original list had already become obsolete and their elimination was consequently in accord with our own thinking. I said that I would be glad to report our conversation to the Secretary and hoped to be able to communicate with him further in the near future.

H F[reeman] M[atthews]
[Attachment 1]

Aide-Mémoire

On the 29th May His Majesty’s Minister sent to the Under Secretary of State a list of subjects suggested by His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom for discussion at the next meeting of [Page 207] Heads of Government.1 Additional suggestions were made in Mr. Balfour’s letter to Mr. Grew of June 1st2 and the Ambassador’s letter to Mr. Grew of June 29th.3

His Majesty’s Government have been considering the agenda in the light of developments since the first draft was presented and the enclosure to the Aide-Mémoire contains a revised list. This list has been drawn up in the form considered suitable for possible communication to the Soviet Government.

[Subattachment]

Revised List of Suggested Topics4

1. General.

a)
Question of procedure for a general European settlement.
b)
Application of the Yalta Declaration on liberated Europe.6
c)
Permission for representatives of the press to function freely in countries of Eastern Europe.
d)
War Crimes.

2. Poland.

3. Germany.

a)
Polish western frontier. Status of Polish administration in former German territory.
b)
Transfer of German populations from Poland and Czechoslovakia.
c)
Exchange of views about the setting up of a central German administration in Berlin to coordinate transport, etc.; future German Government.
d)
Attitude towards political parties and activities.
e)
Treatment of Germany as an economic whole.
f)
Coordination of propaganda and information services to Germany.

4. Italy. Conclusion of a Peace Treaty.

5. Balkans.

a)
Internal situation in ex-satellite countries, with particular reference to the form of governments which have been set up.
b)
Question of eventual peace treaties with these countries.
c)
The status of British and American representatives on the Control Commissions pending conclusion of peace treaties.
d)
Removal of industrial equipment, especially in Roumania, under the guise of booty.
e)
Situation in Yugoslavia and implementation of the Tito-Šubašić agreement.6
f)
The assurance of free elections in all Balkan countries.

6. Turkey.

a)
Russo-Turkish relations.
b)
Modification of the Montreux Convention.7

7. Iran.

Question of the mutual withdrawal of troops.

[Attachment 2]

British Comment on Their Proposed Agenda8

1.
Under Item 1 a) it would be possible to discuss such questions as the holding of a Peace Conference, the future of the European Advisory Commission and permanent machinery for dealing with problems of countries in Allied occupation. We do not propose to discuss at the meeting the details of actual settlement, frontiers, etc. Item b) (application of the Yalta Declaration on Liberated Europe) may be largely covered by discussions under Item 5 a) and f); The former Item 9 c) (transfer of German population from Poland and Czechoslovakia) has now been included in the German paragraph which seems a better place for it. Item 1 d) (War Crimes) is new and may perhaps prove unnecessary in view of the talks now proceeding in London.
2.
Poland has been retained in the list in case problems are outstanding or are thrown up by the negotiations now proceeding in Moscow.
3.
Of the questions listed under 3 we think that a) and b) should certainly be discussed. The Americans may wish to take the initiative as regards b), since they have already raised this matter with us. Items c) to f) all come within the sphere of the Allied Control Commission. We are enquiring of the British element of the Control Commission whether they think it would be useful to exchange views on some or all of them at the forthcoming meeting. There are further German topics which might come up but which we ourselves [Page 209] do not propose to raise. These include 1) disposal of German merchant ships; 2) the future of German industry; 3) reparations; 4) disposal of Russian and Polish displaced persons in Germany. While it will not be possible to avoid discussion of 4) if the Russians raise it we would take the line that the first three are a matter for Reparation Commission and not suitable for discussion at meeting. We would not propose ourselves to raise the question of the composition of a new Austrian Government at the meeting.
4.
As regards 4) our idea would be to inform the Russians in general terms of our intention to conclude a treaty of peace with Italy and to express hope that they will agree. We do not consider that re-definition of our policy and interests in Italy need be discussed at present with the Soviet Government, though we should welcome an opportunity for an exchange of views with members of the United States delegation, if this could be arranged, in London after the meeting.
5.
Under 5, Item f) would afford an opportunity of discussing elections in Greece and possibly Albania if that were thought desirable.
6.
As regards 6 we think the Straits question will inevitably have to be discussed at Terminal in view of the recent exchanges between the Russian and Turkish governments on their general relations.
7.
In addition to the subjects mentioned, our delegation will be briefed on a number of subjects which we ourselves do not intend to raise but which we are prepared to discuss if the Soviet delegation bring them up. These will include, besides those mentioned under 3 above, the proposals for arming European allies, the disposal of the Italian fleet, Venezia Giulia, Greek internal affairs, Albania, a special régime regarding entrances to the Baltic, the Levantine question, the Russian attitude towards Switzerland, and Tangier.
  1. See document No. 144 and the enclosure to document No. 145.
  2. Document No. 148.
  3. Document No. 176.
  4. On July 11 the British Ambassador at Moscow presented to Molotov a “List of Subjects To Be Raised by the British Delegation at Terminal” which was substantially the same as this list, except that, at least on the courtesy copy supplied to the American Embassy at Moscow, item 2 (Poland) was omitted.
  5. See Foreign Relations, The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945, pp. 251254.
  6. See Foreign Relations, The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945, pp. 251254.
  7. League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. clxxiii, p. 213.
  8. This caption appears as a manuscript heading on the original.