File No. 812.00/480.

The Secretary of State to the Postmaster General.

Sir: Referring to previous correspondence, and especially to the Department’s letter of August 30 last in the case of the newspaper known as the Monitor Democrático,1 I have the honor to inclose herewith for your information and for such action, if any, as you may consider appropriate, a copy of a letter from Mr. Charles Q. Davis, president of the Bankers Mining & Development Co., Columbus, Ohio, in which he calls attention to articles appearing in the American Magazine entitled “Barbarous Mexico.”

Mr. Davis states, “We think that the owners and editors of the American Magazine should be prosecuted for libel and the publication denied the use of the mail.”

For your information I inclose a copy of this Department’s reply to Mr. Davis.

I have, etc.,

P. C. Knox.
[Inclosure 1.]

Mr. Charles Q. Davis to the Secretary of State.

Sir: Permit me to call your attention to a matter of importance involving the relation of Mexico and the United States, and the protection of American citizens in Mexico. I spend many months of each year in Mexico and am in close touch with the business interests of Mexico and particularly American interests there.

A great deal of ill feeling has been created among the people of Mexico, particularly the intelligent and business class, against the United States through the publishing in the American Magazine of a series of articles called “Barbarous Mexico.” An investigation disclosed to me proof that back of these publications was a Spaniard who was financing the publications, and the object was to create sympathy in this country favorable to a revolution in Mexico and create ill feeling there against the United States.

To understand the latter it is necessary to know that President Díaz’s policy of extreme friendship for the United States, and his desire to be succeeded by a man who will continue his policy, finds much opposition among certain elements in Mexico. This opposition materialized in the candidacy of Mr. Reyes for Vice President, the object being not so much oppositon to President Díaz as opposition to his successor being a man who would continue the President’s policy toward the United States. This movement failed, and then it was decided to move direct against President Díaz, in an effort to compel him to change his policy and support a man for his successor who would change the attitude of the administration to one of less friendship toward this country.

[Page 373]

In carrying out this campaign the American Magazine was used and the United States Government permitted its use. Newspapers in this country, assuming that a magazine would not print false and malicious statements, commented on these articles and usually unfavorably to Mexico. These comments, together with the articles in question, being quoted in Mexican newspapers, resulted in the widespread feeling that a campaign of vilification and abuse was being waged against Mexico by the press of the United States.

To a certain extent this places in jeopardy the lives and property of Americans throughout Mexico. It created an enormous amount of ill feeling which found an outlet in the Rodríguez case, which was merely a spark that set the feeling long ago engendered afire and was not the cause of the outbreak.

I call your attention to these facts because many Americans agree with me that the United States Government should do something to protect the lives and interests of Americans in Mexico by taking such steps as are necessary to prevent the vicious and uncalled for libeling of the Government and people of Mexico. * * * We think the owners and editors of the American Magazine should be prosecuted for libel and the publication denied the use of the mail. * * * At the request of a number of Americans residing in Mexico I am laying this matter before you, and if there is any further information on the subject that you require, I will be pleased to furnish it.

Yours, truly,

Charles Q. Davis.
[Inclosure 2.]

The Secretary of State to Mr. Davis.

The Department acknowledges the receipt of your letter of November 23, calling attention [etc.].

I share your regret that the friendly and expanding social and commercial relations and intercourse between the United States and Mexico should in any way imperiled or retarded by propaganda carried on from the American side of the boundary line.

I am obliged to say however that it is not clear to me in what way the particular question you raise falls within the jurisdiction of the Federal Government, or how the difficulty may be reached by the Federal officials. The Department has, however, copied your letter to the Postmaster General with a view to investigation as to possible violations of the postal laws by the persons responsible for the publications to which you refer.

It would seem, however, that the matter is entirely within the control of the State authorities, and that if any effective action is to be taken in connection therewith it must be initiated and carried out by them.

I am [etc.],

P. C. Knox.
  1. Not printed (file No. 812.00/38). The Department’s language in the body of the letter to its correspondent (San Antonio Chamber of Commerce) is copied verbatim in Inclosure 2, replying to Mr. Davis.