File No. 1571/3–5.

Minister Rockhill to the Secretary of State.

No. 712.]

Sir: It appearing to me highly important that the diplomatic body should be fully and correctly advised concerning the working of the new agreement for the Huang-pu conservancy, signed at Peking, September 27, 1905,1 I suggested to my colleagues that the consular body at Shanghai should be requested to supply us with such information, and, this proposal being agreed to, on the 6th of June last the inclosed letter was sent to the senior consul at Shanghai by the dean of the diplomatic body.

I inclose herewith a copy of the reply of the senior consul to the dean. I consider the reply as fairly satisfactory, but it demonstrates the necessity of carefully watching the work of the conservancy board to prevent future complications and possible delays.

The periodical reports which the senior consul is requested to make to the diplomatic body on this question will, it is hoped, prove of value, and contribute to expediting the work and insuring strict compliance with the terms of the agreement of September 27, 1905.

I have, etc.,

W. W. Rockhill.
[Inclosure 1.]

The Dean of the Diplomatic Corps to the Senior Consul at Shanghai.

Sir: It appearing to the diplomatic body highly important that it should be informed concerning the working of the new agreement for the Huangpu conservancy, signed at Peking, September 27, 1905, I have to request that you will transmit to me at your earliest convenience a report on the following points, on all of which the diplomatic body considers that it should be kept advised under the provisions of the new agreement above mentioned:

1.
Have the works been carried out with diligency, care, and economy?
2.
Are the measures which the Chinese Government has adopted for financing the enterprise such that its requirements are and will be satisfactorily insured?
3.
In view of the possible reduction of the opium revenue, has any information been given you by the Chinese authorities concerning an additional guaranty for annual payments for the works?
4.
Have the monthly instalments been regularly paid to the Shanghai tao-t’ai and the commissioner of customs, and since what date?
5.
Where are the funds deposited and how and by whom drawn?
6.
What interest is allowed on monthly balances of these funds, and to what purpose is such interest applied?
7.
By whom are the annual accounts of the conservancy board audited?

I would be obliged if hereafter you would supply me quarterly, after the detailed report provided for by Article IV of the new agreement has been submitted and inspected by the consular body, with copies of said reports and the observations on them by your body, so that I may communicate them to my colleagues of the diplomatic body.

I have, etc.,

A. J. van Citters.
[Page 78]
[Inclosure 2.]

The Consul General for Belgium and Senior Consul of the Shanghai Consular Body to the Dean of the Diplomatic Corps at Peking.

Excellency: In pursuance of my letter of the 6th instant I have the honor to reply as hereunder on the points submitted in your letter of the 6th June:

I. Have the works been carried out with diligency, care, and economy?

The works have been carried out till now by the staff of the board with diligency, care, and economy, so far as the consular body is in a position to judge and so far as the said staff has been allowed to go on with the work. It seems to the consular body that the board does not come to its decisions with enough promptitude, which can only be explained by the impression under which labors the tao-t’ai, that he must ask advice of his superiors on any question of importance. The spirit of the convention gives to the board full powers to act without outside advice.

II. Are the measures which the Chinese Government has adopted for financing the enterprise such that its requirements are and will be satisfactorily insured?

If the Chinese Government understands that it is obliged by the convention to pay all the costs of the works, even if the amount required is more than twenty times 460,000 taels, the question “how exceptional high and extraordinary expenses above the annual payment of 460,000 taels shall be covered” will have to be settled between the foreign powers and the Chinese Government as soon as the engineer decides that such extraordinary expenditure is required.

III. In view of the possible reduction of the opium revenue, has any information been given you by the Chinese authorities concerning an additional guarantee for annual payments for the works?

In anticipation of the decrease in opium revenue the Shanghai tao-t’ai has already petitioned the imperial Government to appropriate money from other sources of revenue to make up possible losses.

IV. Have the monthly installments been regularly paid to the Shanghai tao-t’ai and the commissioner of customs and since what date?

From the quarterly report for June quarter it appears that the tao-t’ai has written to his codirector, Mr. Hobson, customs commissioner, that remittances on conservancy accounts commenced to reach him in July, 1904, and that the same total of 3,460,000 haikwan, 1,380,000 taels has reached him on the 1st July, 1907; that the balance of the money not expended, taels 1,124,743, is deposited in various banks under the responsibility of the tao-t’ai. The consular body is writing under this date to the board pointing out that the monthly installments should be put, according to the convention of 27 September, 1905, Article X, “entre les mains du tao-t’ai et du commissaire des douanes de Shanghai,” that is to say, in the hands of the Whangpoo Conservancy Board.

V. Where are the funds deposited, and how and by whom are they drawn?

The consular body does not know, but it is pointing out to the board that the funds ought to be deposited in the name of the board in one of several banks, in one of which a current account should be opened on which money could be drawn by the joint directors or their delegate.

VI. What interest is allowed on monthly balances of these funds and to what purpose is such interest applied?

The June quarterly report shows that the interest account made up at the end of the fifth moon, current year (July 5, 1907), stands at 116,854.90 taels, but no details are given concerning the rate of interest or to what purpose said interest is to be applied. The consular body is of the opinion that this interest should be supplied to the works of the conservancy scheme, and is writing in that sense to the board.

VII. By whom are the annual accounts of the conservancy board audited?

The consular body thinks that such auditing should be done by an auditor to be appointed by the board.

The consular body has also considered these questions:

(A)
Who is to provide for the always rather expensive maintenance of the works? And answers that the Chinese Government must provide for it, but is of opinion that the question should not be raised now.
(B)
To what purpose should the proceeds from sale or lease of reclaimed land be applied? And answers to the conservancy work, and is writing in that sense to the board.
(C)
The consular body is also of the opinion that the normal lines as described and settled by the board on the advice of the engineer must be respected and observed by the riparian owners.
(D)
The question of who should be in charge of the bunding of the river along private properties is also of great importance, and has also been considered by us, but the Shanghai Chamber of Commerce, having appointed a committee composed of the principal riparian owners to study the question, it is perhaps advisable to await their report before taking further action.

I have, etc.,

D. Tiffert.