File No. 5315/407–411.
Chargé Fletcher to the Secretary of State.
Peking, June 9, 1909.
Sir: Confirming my telegram of the 7th instant, I have the honor to inclose copy of the agreement between Chang Chih-tung, director general of the Canton-Hankow Railway and of the Hupeh section of the Szechuen-Hankow Railway, and the Deutsch-Asiatische Bank, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, and the Banque de l’lndo-Chine for a loan of five million five hundred thousand pounds (£5,500,000) sterling.
The proceeds of the loan are to be devoted to the construction by China of the Hupeh-Hunan section of the Canton-Hankow Railway and of the Hupeh section of the Szechuen-Hankow Railway and the redemption of the outstanding bonds issued by the American-China Development Co. on behalf of the Chinese Government on account of construction of the Hankow-Canton Railway.
The Hunan-Hupeh section of the Canton-Hankow Railway extends from Wuchang, the capital of Hupeh Province, through Yochou [Page 153] and Chang-sha, the capital of Hunan, to a point on the southern boundary of Hunan, connecting with the southern or Kuangtung section of the Canton-Hankow Railway.
The Hupeh section of the Szechuen-Hankow Railway extends from Ichang in Hupeh to Kuang-Hsui on the Peking-Hankow Railway, passing through Ching-men-chou and Haiang-yang, and includes also a branch line from Ching-men-chou through Shasi to Hanyang.
Two million five hundred thousand pounds is allotted to the construction of each of these sections, and £500,000 to the redemption of the American-China Development Co.’s bonds. If any excess of the latter sum remains after retirement of these bonds it is to be applied to construction of the Hunan-Hupeh section of the Canton-Hankow Railway.
The rate of interest on the loan is 5 per cent, and the term is 25 years. After 10 and up to the end of the seventeenth year of the loan China has the right to redeem the whole or any part of the loan at a premium of 2½ per cent of face value of the bonds. The price of bonds to the Chinese Government is fixed at 95.
The loan is guaranteed by the Imperial Chinese Government and is secured by—
- (1)
- Hupeh general likin, amounting to 2,000,000 haikwan taels a year;
- (2)
- Hupeh additional salt tax for river defense, amounting to 400,000 haikwan taels a year;
- (3)
- Hupeh new additional 2–cash salt tax of September, 1908, amounting to 300,000 haikwan taels a year;
- (4)
- Hupeh collection of Hukuang interprovincial tax on imported rice, amounting to 250,000 haikwan taels a year;
- (5)
- Hunan general likin, amounting to 2,000,000 haikwan taels a year;
- (6)
- Hunan salt commissioner’s treasury regular salt likin, amounting to 250,000 haikwan taels a year, which are declared free from all other imposts and charges.
It will be noted that the general terms are similar to those of the Tientsin-Pukow Railway loan agreement, forwarded in my No. 817, of January 17, 1908. Two foreign chief engineers and two auditors, one for each section, respectively, are provided for, but do not seem to possess any real power to check expenditure.
The clause with reference to the abolition of likin is in the same language as Tientsin-Pukow agreement. The banks themselves or their agents will act as agents in the purchase of materials, etc. Chinese materials will be given preference, but if foreign materials are required those of German, British, and French origin will be given preference at equal prices. The agents will receive a commission of 5 per cent on purchase of foreign materials, but no commission on Chinese goods.
It is also provided that branch lines in connection with the railways named shall be built by China with such funds as she may have, but if foreign capital is required preference will be given to the banks mentioned. It may be that the banks will contend that this article gives them preference in the further extension into Szechuen, but it is the present intention of the Chinese Government to build that extension with Chinese funds, as the people of Szechuen strongly object to a foreign loan in this connection.
[Page 154]The agreement also provides for delegation and subdelegation of rights of the banks, but only to German, British, or French concerns.
I am confidentially informed by the representative of the British & Chinese Corporation, whose name does not appear in the agreement, but which is no doubt interested with the Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation, that Chang Chih-tung has given an assurance in writing to the banks that the Imperial Government will not delegate its authority to the Provinces, as was done in the Kiang-su Railway, and that the local gentry will not be allowed to interfere in the matter.
The British & Chinese Corporation were originally interested in the Canton-Hankow Railway loan, but by insisting on stricter terms incurred the displeasure of the Chinese authorities and were excluded from active participation in this loan. I am told by its representative, Mr. Bland, who leaves shortly for London, that an effort will be made by his principals to interest American capital also, and that they will be prepared to lend China all the money she wants. It is very likely that money will be offered to China freely on terms as good or better than these, and there is some danger that she will be tempted to borrow more than sound principles of finance will justify.
Referring to the assurances given by China to Mr. Conger in 1904 and 1905, which have formed the subject of recent telegraphic correspondence between the department and the legation, I have the honor to inclose translation of the notes on which our rights to participate in a foreign loan for the Hankow-Szechuen Railway are based. The department will note that Mr. Conger, in reporting this matter, placed a stronger construction on these assurances than would seem to be justified by the translations inclosed. The validity of these assurances has not, however, been called in question by the Wai-wu Pu in the interviews with Mr. Rockhill and myself, and the legation’s proceeding on the assumption that they are recognized as binding.
Immediately upon receipt of the department’s telegram of May 24 last on this subject, Mr. Rockhill took up the matter with the Wai-wu Pu and in three or four personal interviews urged our claim in the premises. He was informed that the foreign office had no authority in the matter; that Chang Chih-tung has been solely empowered by imperial edict to deal with it; that they would inform him of our position and claim.
On receipt of your telegram of the 4th instant I went, on the 5th, to the foreign office and insisted upon our right to be consulted in accordance with the assurances heretofore given and informed them that we were in a position to take up the matter. I was informed that our representations had been communicated to Chang Chih-tung, who had made no reply.
On returning to the legation, I embodied your instructions in a note, copy of which I inclose.
The substance of your telegram of the 8th instant will be communicated to the Prince of Ching this afternoon and I have also asked for an appointment with Cnang Chih-tung, the director general of the Hankow-Szechuen Railway, to whom I will also communicate its contents to-day or at the very earliest opportunity.
I have, etc.,