Mr. Buck to Mr. Hay.
Tokyo, December 20, 1901.
Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of and to confirm the telegraphic instruction of the 18th instant.
I have notified United States Consul-General Bellows, at Yokohama, of the course to be taken by Americans of that city as directed by the instruction, and also our consuls at Kobe and Nagasaki, though no complaint from these cities in respect of the “house tax” or other taxes has yet been received.
In relation to this subject, I inclose a copy of a communication from me to Consul-General Bellows of date of October 31 last, giving my opinion upon the subject, having inadvertently omitted sending it as an inclosure with a previous dispatch.
While many foreigners, including Americans, in Yokohama still refuse to pay the “house tax,” though formal demands have been made upon them, no seizure of property has yet been made, which, possibly, may be somewhat due to a suggestion I made to the minister for foreign affairs some weeks ago, that such course be not taken before I had received further instruction, after the receipt at Washington and consideration by the Department of the decision of the Imperial Government upon the “house-tax” question, which decision I had forwarded. The minister, however, gave no assurance of delay in enforcing collection of taxes by distraining property.
In an interview with the minister for foreign affairs some time ago, I took the liberty to suggest arbitration of the questions at issue respecting the “house tax” and tax on incomes derived from property held by foreigners under leases in perpetuity, on the ground that such a course would satisfactorily settle all differences. I thought that, since the United States had not joined with other powers in protesting, the minister’s mind might be more open to a favorable consideration of such a suggestion from me than from some others, but I found him not willing to accede to such a proposal. He said that the representative of another power had already suggested that course and he had declined to consider it, as there was nothing in the case to justify recourse to arbitration, and that his colleagues in the cabinet fully agreed with him in that view.
I have, etc.,