Mr. Hay to Mr. Cambon.

No. 443.]

Excellency: In further reply to Mr. de Margerie’s note of the 22d ultimo, I have the honor to inclose a copy of a report of the United States district attorney for the district of Oregon, relative to the violations of the Franco-American consular convention of February 23, 1853, of which complaint was made in the note.

Hoping that the district attorney’s report will be considered a satisfactory explanation of the matter, I avail myself, etc.,

John Hay.
[Inclosure.]

United States attorney for the district of Oregon to the Attorney-General.

Sir: Your two communications, dated January 10 instant, with reference to the complaint made by the chargé d’affaires ad interim of the French Republic at Washington, that Articles VIII and IX of the Franco-American consular convention of [Page 399] February 23, 1853, are frequently violated and ignored by the State and Federal officers at this port, are just at hand and contents noted. Permit me to say in reply that I have made a careful investigation of the cause of this complaint, and inquiry at the office of the United States marshal for this district discloses that the marshal and his deputies have at all times lent their willing assistance to the consular agent of the French Republic stationed at this port, Mr. Labbe, whenever requested, and have apprehended a great many French sailors in this port and delivered them to the said consul. There has been no application of any kind to my office, save and except by the said consular agent, for advice as to the manner of procedure to recapture deserting sailors. This I gave him, and have at all times held myself in readiness to aid and assist him in any manner.

I also investigated the case of the libeling and seizure of the French vessel Amiral Cornulier in this port, and find the facts to be as follows.

That a libel was filed in the district court of the United States by a seaman against said vessel for wages upon December 10, 1901. A warrant was issued by the court without any knowledge or notice to what country the ship belonged, or whether foreign or domestic. The vessel was discharged upon a bond being given in the sum of $150. On the 27th of December exceptions to said libel were filed, and on the same date a protest by the French consul was also filed. The matter has not been called as yet to the attention of the court, but will be dismissed as soon as the court learns officially of the facts in the case. Judge Bellinger has at all times been careful and particular to carry out the rules of the various treaties with foreign countries in relation to their shipping interests, and his rulings in cases of this kind have so far always been favorable to the various consular officers who are representing the interests of their countries, and I feel assured that there is no cause for complaint at this port.

There is a very bad crimping system in vogue here. I am informed that French sailors have been enticed into the sailor boarding houses and then transported over into the State of Washington and secreted, pending the extortion of blood money from the masters or agents of the vessels. But these matters are difficult to prove, and the masters of vessels or agents are loath to make complaint for fear of greater loss and detention at the hands of the boarding house keepers. And I think that the cause of complaint arises from this source and not from the failure or refusal of Federal officials to perform their duties.

Very respectfully,

John H. Hall, United States Attorney.