Mr. Hay to Mr.
Thiebaut.
October 29,
1898.
No. 127.]
Sir: I had the honor duly to receive the note
which you addressed to me on the 4th instant, in which, at the request
of the minister of state of Spain, you lay before me certain
observations of the Spanish Government made in reply to this
Department’s notes to Mr. Cambon of the 5th, 8th, and 16th ultimo.
Among these observations are included several subjects which are now
under discussion by the peace commission at Paris, and for that reason
the Government of the United States does not think it convenient to
discuss them here.
I deem it proper, however, to say:
- 1.
- That the Government of the United States is not able to accept
the interpretation placed by the Government of Spain upon the
respective effects in law and in fact of the protocol of August
12 and the capitulation of August 14 upon the military situation
at Manila.
- 2.
- That the President has given orders to the American
authorities in the Philippines to use their good offices,
wherever possible, to prevent any excesses of the insurgents or
any cruel treatment of prisoners or Spanish subjects.
- 3.
- That the American men-of-war to which your note referred as
having been ordered to Manila are actually under orders to visit
the coast of Brazil and afterwards to proceed to the Hawaiian
Islands.
Accept, sir, etc.,
[Page 818]
[Translation.]
French Embassy,
Washington, October 11,
1898.
The minister of state at Madrid has been informed that the American
commission of evacuation in Cuba has particularly insisted, with the
Spanish commission, on the three following points:
- 1.
- By the terms of the protocol of August 12 the renunciation
of Spain’s sovereignty over Cuba is a condition precedent to
the negotiation and conclusion of a treaty of peace.
- 2.
- In accordance with the same act the evacuation must be
irremediable (absolute), which implies the entire
abandonment of the country by all Spanish authorities, both
civil and military.
- 3.
- The evacuation must be completely effected by December 1
next, at the latest.
The Government of Her Majesty the Queen Regent is of the opinion that
Articles I and IV of the protocol are inseparably connected with
Article V, and that, consequently, the evacuation before the
signature of the treaty of peace can not involve the legal
significance of the renunciation of the sovereignty. That legal
significance will not be acquired until the treaty of peace shall
been approved “in accordance with the constitutional forms of the
two countries.” It was for this reason that the future tense was
employed in the protocol in stipulating, on the one hand, the
renunciation by Spain of the sovereignty of Cuba, and, on the other
hand, the cessions of territory made by her as a war indemnity. The
evacuation provided by Article IV of the protocol can not,
therefore, be confounded with the transfer of the sovereignty, which
can only become legal after the exchange of the ratification of the
treaty of peace. Hence it follows that it is evident that the
substitution of American troops in Cuba does not put an end to the
sovereign power of Spain, and that all the Spanish authorities shall
continue to act after the evacuation so long as there shall not
exist, by virtue of the ratification of the treaty of peace, another
sovereign power.
Upon the hypothesis that her renunciation of the sovereignty is
irremediable (absolute) and simultaneous with the evacuation, it is
the duty of Spain, under penalty of incurring grave
responsibilities, to know who will succeed her in that sovereignty,
and what guaranties such successor will offer for the security of
Spanish interests in Cuba.
Her Majesty’s Government, far from placing difficulties in the way of
the evacuation, desires that it be effected as speedily as possible,
and is seeking the material means of effecting it; but it has not at
its disposal the enormous fleet which would be required to complete
it within so short a period. Spain, while promising to hasten, by
all possible means, the return of her troops to their own country,
hopes that the United States will grant her a reasonable extension
of time.
The Royal Government would be gratified if the Federal Government
would have the goodness to reply promptly to the present note.
Memorandum.
The Government of the United States is not able to accept the
conclusions of the Royal Government of Spain in regard to the
relinquishment of sovereignty by Spain in the island of Cuba under
the
[Page 819]
terms of the protocol
of August 12, but, as this question is one of those under discussion
by the peace commission now in session at Paris, it is not
considered expedient to enter upon any such discussion here at this
moment.
The subject of the limit of time to be allowed for the evacuation of
Cuba has received the careful consideration of the President, and,
in view of the material difficulties in the way of completing the
repatriation of the Spanish troops by the 1st of December, he has
extended the period to the 1st of January, 1899, and has informed
the commission of evacuation of this conclusion.