Mr. Powell to Mr. Sherman.

No. 59.]

Sir: I have called the attention of the Department in a previous communication (dispatch No. 35), in reference to the tax imposed by the Government upon foreigners not having native clerks. Since that dispatch (No. 35) was written, Messrs. Weymann & Co. have lodged with the legation a protest upon the imposition of this tax, claiming it [Page 391] is in violation of section 5 of our treaty with Haiti. They have called upon me in regard to this matter. I have recommended them to pay under protest rather than to have their goods seized and sold, to satisfy this claim, and to be thus inconvenienced in their business, and to file a copy of such protest with me. I call attention of the Department to dispatch No. 428, dated February 17, 1876, during the time that Mr. E. B. Bassett was acting as minister resident, etc., in which he was instructed in No. 261, of March 13, 1876, by the honorable Secretary, Hamilton Fish, “that such license law was illegal; you will protest in the name of your Government against it and claim from that of Haiti, etc.”

The questions at present at issue are, and which the Department will favor me with instruction:

  • First. Under the treaty are American citizens compelled to pay a tax for clerks in their employ not Haitians?
  • Second. After having paid said tax for a year, are they compelled to pay for the same period of time already paid on account of a recent law enacted by the legislative branch of the Government? If this right be granted, any subsequent legislature may raise such a tax two or three times a year, or whenever they may meet in regular or extraordinary session. I feel that these questions should be settled for all time.

I have, etc.,

W. F. Powell.
[Inclosure 1 in No. 59.]

Ch. Weymann & Co. to Mr. Powell.

Sir: We have the honor of informing you that we have this day paid under protest the amount of $75 for the patent of each of our foreign clerks to the municipal board of this city.

Inclosed we beg to hand you copy of the letter we sent to the mayor on this subject.

We have the honor to remain, etc.,

Ch. Weymann & Co.
[Subinclosure.]

Ch. Weymann & Co. to the Mayor.

Sir: Herewith we beg to hand you the sum of $75, being the amount of additional taxes you claim on our three foreign clerks, which we pay under protest.

At the same time we beg to inform you that we have laid our claim before the American minister.

We have the honor to remain, etc.,

Ch. Weymann & Co.
[Inclosure 2 in No. 59.]

Ch. Weymann & Co. to Mr. Powell.

Dear Sir: Confirming our conversation of this morning, we now beg to state that we have been established here in Port au Prince since [Page 392] 1877, doing a general import and export trade and banking business.

As to the extent of the trade we do with the States, we beg to say that our turnover with our New York agents since January, 1897, has been $333,000.

We remain, dear sir, etc.,

Ch. Weymann & Co.
[Inclosure 3 in No. 59.]

Article 1. The laws of October 24 and 30, 1876, on the administration of direct taxes, assessment of tenant and license taxes are prolonged for the exercise 1897–98, with the following modification bearing on the tariff annexed to that of October 30, 1876.

The quota of license of foreigners employed as clerks, or any other service of merchants, tradesmen, manufacturers, or artisans, either natives or foreigners, is modified as follows:

Gourdes.
First class 75
Second class 60
Third class 50
Fourth class 40
Fifth class 35
Sixth class 30

Art. 2. The secretaries of state for finance and of commerce and of the interior are charged in that which concerns them with the execution of the present law.

Art. 5. Article 18 of the law of 1876 on taxes shall be applied in its form and tenor. However, the communal magistrates have the faculty of requesting the justice of peace, and in his place the communal police, assisted by two witnesses, to closing up of any establishment, foreigners or Haitian, who shall not have paid his license within the lawful delay.

A minute of the procedure shall be drawn up on the spot.

Art. 6. In the forty-eight hours of the operation the proprietor of the said establishment shall give a citation to the receiver of the commune before the court of the justice of peace of the section, who shall decide.

Art. 7. If the merchant is found guilty, the judge shall maintain the closing and condemn the proprietor, as is said in article 18 of the law of 1876 on direct taxes.

Art. 8. If the citation is not made within the forty-eight hours, the justice of peace, by the simple presentation of the communal receiver of the minute mentioned in article 5, shall maintain the closing of the establishment and condemn the dilatory, as it has just been said.

The judgments obtained against the contributors are not susceptible to opposition, and shall be executed without delay and immediately.