Department
of State,
Washington, November 2,
1888.
No. 130.]
[Inclosure in No. 130.]
Mr. Rives to Mr.
Goutier.
Department of State,
Washington, November 1,
1888.
No. 352.]
Sir: Your dispatches numbered 910, 912, 913,
and 914, bearing the respective dates of October 4, 8, 13, and 15, 1888,
have been received.
The interesting and effective recital they give of the recent
revolutionary occurrences at Cape Haytien and the movement against the
capital is commended.
The Department can not, however, so commend your reported letter of
October 8 to Mr. Thompson, in which, referring to the excited feelings
of the inhabitants of northern Hayti and their avowed purpose to avenge
the death of General Thélémaque, you say:
“In view of this impending fratricidal war and its disastrous result, the
consuls here are of opinion that the diplomatic and consular corps at
Port au Prince might, by using such means as they deem proper, by
appealing to the patriotism of the members of the provisional government
or the existing authorities, induce them to have General Légitime’s name
withdrawn from the list of candidates for the Presidency, being that
alone can save Hayti from all the horrors of civil war, with its direful
consequences.”
Fully recognizing the humane and honest motives which inspired you in
thus addressing the United States minister at the Haytian capital, this
Government can not lend the approbation of silence to the extraordinary
suggestion of interference with the free exercise of the franchise by
the Haytian people which is involved in the recommendation you make on
behalf of your consular associates and in your own name. This Department
is clearly and decidedly of the opinion that the expression of
individual views by any representative of the United States in regard to
a pending election by the” citizens of the country to which he is
accredited is a gross impropriety, which in a proper case entirely
warrants his recall or dismissal from his post. In the present instance
the apparent urgency of the case and your laudable desiro to prevent
bloodshed are sufficient to relieve you from any severer mark of the
President’s displeasure than the course hereby conveyed. Indeed, lam
quite sure that had you been prompted less by the instant impulses of
humanity and the desire to avert imminent disaster, reflection would
have led you to withhold assent from the proposal of your
colleagues.
I am, etc.,
G. L. Rives,
Acting
Secretary.