465. Memorandum From Robert Pastor of the National Security Council Staff to the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Brzezinski)1

SUBJECT

  • PRM on Central America (S)

At David’s request,2 I have cut the PRM on Central America in half. It is attached at Tab I for your signature. (S)

Vaky has accepted my suggestion, and is holding a Chiefs of Mission Conference for our Ambassadors to the Central American Governments in San Jose, May 16–18, 1979. I suggested to him that we should directly involve our Ambassadors in the PRM process in order to obtain from them a better sense of the feasibility of different approaches and also to involve them in the policy so that they will be better prepared to implement it. He has asked me to go down with him to the conference, and I think that since this is a National Security Council exercise, and since we have been pressing State to pay closer attention to the problems of Central America, that I should go. (S)

[Page 1199]

RECOMMENDATIONS:

That you sign the PRM at Tab I.3

That you approve my travelling to the Central American Chiefs of Mission Conference, May 16–18, 1979.4

Tab I

Presidential Review Memorandum/NSC–465

TO

  • The Vice President
  • The Secretary of State
  • The Secretary of Defense

ALSO

  • The Secretary of the Treasury
  • The Secretary of Agriculture
  • The Secretary of Commerce
  • The Director, Office of Management and Budget
  • The Special Representative for Trade Negotiations
  • The Administrator, Agency for International Development
  • The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
  • The Director of Central Intelligence

SUBJECT

  • Review of U.S. Policies Toward Central America (S)

The President has directed the Policy Review Committee to undertake a comprehensive review of U.S. policy for Central America. Our goal is to develop a coherent set of policies toward each of the countries and toward the region as a whole that will more effectively promote our interests which include the development of democratic societies, the observance of human rights, the ending or diminution of violence and terrorism, and the denial of the region to forces hostile to the U.S. Among the goals leading to the promotion of these interests are the economic and social development of the countries in the region, [Page 1200] increased regional cooperation, the development of a viable, democratic middle in the four northern countries of Central America. (S)

Under the direction of the Secretary of State, a paper should be prepared which analyzes the problems in the countries and in the region, including the impact of the situation in Nicaragua on the region, and the distinctive causes of violence and instability in each country. (S)

The review should discuss specific policies which the USG should consider to each nation and to the region as a whole to further the goals and interests described above. The policies should address regional issues such as economic integration and cooperation, and disputes among countries of the region. It should propose specific policies or positions toward key groups in the region including guerrilla groups, and toward countries outside the region that influence or assist these groups. (S)

The review should include recommendations on how best to involve other countries outside the region, including Mexico, Panama, Venezuela, Colombia, the Caribbean, Canada, the UK and Israel, in the broad effort to promote the goals described. (S)

The Secretary of State should chair the Policy Review Committee, and the review should be based on a 20-page paper, exclusive of appendices, to be transmitted to the National Security Council by June 1, 1979.6 (S)

Zbigniew Brzezinski
  1. Source: Carter Library, National Security Council, Institutional Files, Box 54, PRM/NSC–46 (1). Secret. Sent for action.
  2. See footnote 1, Document 464.
  3. Brzezinski approved this recommendation and an unknown hand wrote: “ZB signed 5/4/79.”
  4. Brzezinski approved this recommendation. An unknown hand added the following at the bottom of the page: “DA revised Tab I.” For more information about the Chiefs of Mission Conference, see Document 466.
  5. Secret.
  6. For information concerning the final, revised response to PRM 46, see footnote 2, Document 468.