340. Memorandum From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Brzezinski) to President Carter1
SUBJECT
- Letter to President Carazo (U)
During the last few months, President Carazo of Costa Rica has been extremely helpful to us on a number of issues, especially Cuban refugees and El Salvador. He has hosted two conferences in San Jose on Cuban refugees, and he has agreed to challenge the Cubans for a UN Security Council seat next fall. In the months ahead, we will need his cooperation even more on Central America, at the UN, and on Cuban refugees. On May 26, President Carazo wrote to you to request help on an issue of fundamental importance to his country—economic development (Tab B).2 He will expect us to be as responsive to his concern as he has been to ours. (C)
[Page 836]President Carazo describes the serious economic problems his country faces and requests your support for two proposals: (1) a special fund for housing (requiring a $50 million soft loan); and (2) a mechanism for channeling US deposits into Costa Rica’s banking system. He writes that “exceptional solutions are required to keep Costa Rica as a true example of democracy.” (C)
The response which State prepared (Tab A) was delayed because State and IDCA are currently debating whether to continue the bilateral aid program to Costa Rica, a middle-income developing country, in FY 82. IDCA wants to phase out such programs in line with Ehrlich’s concentration strategy, while State argues that Costa Rica is a key democracy in a turbulent region and terminating aid would not only be a setback to Costa Rica’s economy but it would send a signal throughout Central America that we are treating radicals like Nicaragua better than democracies. State and IDCA resolved this debate by deferring it until the Fall Budget Review. The result is that the letter at Tab A does not include a paragraph reaffirming your intent to maintain a bilateral aid program, even though State, OMB, IDCA, and Owen all recognize that the letter would reinforce the present Costa Rican expectation that our development aid program will be continued in FY 62.3 (C)
If you sign the letter at Tab A, which is reasonably positive, while contemplating the termination of aid to Costa Rica, it will at best be considered disingenuous. The very fact that we are addressing questions such as whether to end aid and restrict textile exports from Costa Rica rather than questions such as how to increase aid and trade suggests an intent different than implied by the letter. Considering the special and difficult circumstances of Costa Rica and the importance which our aid program has in showing that we favor democracies in the region, you may want to consider adding an explicit reaffirmation of your intent to continue the aid program. This would send as powerful a message of your concern to our government as to Costa Rica’s. The following paragraph added to your letter would make that point: (C)
Generally speaking, our bilateral development assistance is directed toward the poorer developing countries of the world and is targeted to assist urgent, long-term development problems in specific sectors. But I have made an exception to this approach for the Caribbean and Central America, and I place a particularly high priority on assisting democratic and progressive nations in the region. We intend to maintain our bilateral aid program to Costa Rica and to seek ways to make it more effective in the future. (C)
[Page 837]However, the above would constitute a decision to continue aid to Costa Rica. State, IDCA, OMB and Owen would prefer that you send the letter at Tab A without the paragraph above. (C)
- Source: Carter Library, National Security Affairs, Brzezinski Material, Brzezinski Office File, Country Chron File, Box 7, Costa Rica, 1980. Confidential. Sent for action. Carter initialed the top of the page.↩
- Attached but not printed is a translation of Carazo’s letter.↩
- The reference to “FY 62” is an apparent typo for FY 82.↩
- No classification marking.↩