93. Memorandum From the President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs (Kissinger) to President Nixon, Washington, October 7, 1970.1 2

[Page 1]

THE WHITE HOUSE
WASHINGTON
INFORMATION

October 7, 1970, A.M.

MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
FROM: Henry A. Kissinger [HK initialed]
SUBJECT: Bolivia

The military rebellion by moderate and conservative military officers which ousted President Ovando yesterday appears to have collapsed. The military junta which took over yesterday has disintegrated.

General Juan Jose Torres, the radical and ultranationalist former armed forces chief, who had himself been forced out of the government last spring, appears to be filling the vacuum. Latest reports indicate that he has assumed “leadership” of the country and military units loyal to him have taken over the presidential palace and seem to be in control of La Paz itself.

Shortly after the capitulation of President Ovando to Army Chief General Rogelio Miranda on the morning of 6 October, General Torres began his move to take over the country. He assumed control of the air base outside La Paz and military units based there. He launched a campaign to win support of labor and student groups. Proclaiming himself the leader of the “revolution” that had been led by Ovando and was now threatened by General Miranda, he received a steady stream of visitors at the base during the day. By yesterday evening he had apparently succeeded in solidifying a coalition that included practically the entire labor movement, important peasant groups, the leftists student elements of La Paz and a number of military units, including the crack paratroop battalion (US trained and MAP supported) at Cochabamba. Torres supporters proclaimed a general strike in the early morning hours today.

Faced with an ultimatum last night and following a strafing flight by three planes from Torres’ base, the junta collapsed. One member joined Torres, the other two resigned. Miranda is still at his headquarters but apparently with a rapidly diminishing force under him.

The situation in La Paz this morning is described as explosive. According to clandestine sources, Torres has armed some of his student supporters. There are also reports that some of Torres’ civilian support claim that the crisis is one that can be harnessed for anti-US purposes, and violence against Americans or the Embassy is not impossible.

[Page 2]

This situation resulted from the almost incredible incompetence and indecisiveness of those who initiated the rebellion Sunday. They refused to act on several occasions when it was clear they had the power to nail down their position. They refused to isolate Torres’ base and cutoff his visitors. As late as last night, they apparently had sufficient force to move on the airbase and capture Torres’ headquarters, but they refused to move. They were apparently afraid to risk bloodshed and the rapid coalescing of labor and student support behind Torres may have frightened them. General Torres meanwhile seems to have been the only principal figure in the drama who has acted decisively and with calculated risk taking.

A Torres’ regime will most probably be ultra-nationalistic, leftist and anti-US. Some of the leftists, super-nationalist former members of Ovando’s cabinet who were ousted under military pressure earlier this year, have already reappeared around General Torres. The more moderate elements in the military are likely to be reduced in effectiveness if they are not already destroyed.

Bio data on Torres is attached.

  1. Source: National Archives, Nixon Presidential Materials, NSC Files, Box 770, Country Files, Latin America, Bolivia, Vol. 1, 1969–1970. Secret. Sent for information. In his October 7 covering memorandum to Kissinger, Vaky stated, “I think Torres will be far more radical than the Peruvian generals. He is a real potential Nassarist.” Attached but not printed is biographical information.
  2. When briefing President Nixon on the ouster of President Ovando by General Torres on October 6, President’s Assistant for National Security Affairs Kissinger predicted that the new regime would be ultranationalistic, leftist, and anti-United States.