112. Despatch From the Ambassador in Vietnam (Durbrow) to the Department of State1

No. 278

REF

  • Department’s Telegram No. 1339, January 29, 19602

SUBJECT

  • Special Report on Current Internal Security Situation

Enclosed is a special report prepared by a Country Team study group on the current internal security situation in Viet-Nam. A summary of this report and an analysis of the main factors in Viet-Nam’s current serious internal security problem are given below:

Situation. Internal security, which improved greatly since the nip and tuck period from 1954–56 but which nevertheless has been a steady concern of the GVN over the past few years, has again become its No. 1 problem as a result of intensification of Viet Cong guerrilla and terrorist activities, weaknesses apparent in the GVN security forces and the growth of apathy and considerable dissatisfaction among the rural populace. The situation has grown progressively more disturbing since shortly after the National Assembly elections at the end of August 1959, despite the fact that President Diem was claiming, up to the end of December, that internal security was continuing to improve. The monthly rate of assassinations rose substantially starting in September, and other signs of increasingly aggressive VC tactics such as ambushes of GVN security forces began to appear about the same time. The full impact of the seriousness of the present situation was brought home by a series of VC incidents in late January and February, particularly an attack on an ARVN regimental post near Tay Ninh, other smaller and less dramatic attacks on security posts elsewhere in the southwest and serious VC depredations in Kien Hoa Province.

President Diem and other GVN officials are now showing a reassuring awareness of the gravity of the situation. They have not permitted themselves to become panic-stricken, and there is no reason to become alarmist if prompt steps are taken to correct the situation.

[Page 301]

VC Intentions and Potential. Indications are growing that the VC are mounting a special campaign aimed at undermining the Diem Government. According to … . sources, VC armed cadre strength has increased to about 3,000 in the southwest, double the number in September. VC groups now operate in larger strength, and their tactics have changed from attacks on individuals to rather frequent and daring attacks on GVN security forces. A recent … report has indicated a VC intention to press general guerrilla warfare in South Viet-Nam in 1960, and indicates the VC are convinced they can mount a coup d’état this year. President Diem also told me in late February about the capture of a VC document indicating their intention to step up aggressive attacks all over the country, including Saigon, beginning in the second quarter.

These signs indicate that aggressively worded statements emanating from the DRV in 1959 may accurately reflect DRV intentions. In May 1959 the central committee of the Lao Dong Party passed a resolution stating that the struggle for reunification of Viet-Nam should be carried out by all “appropriate means”. Subsequently in conversations with Western officials, Prime Minister Pham van Dong made statements to the effect that “We will be in Saigon tomorrow” and “We will drive the Americans into the sea”.

It is not completely clear why the DRV has chosen this particular time to mount an intensified guerrilla campaign in South Viet-Nam. Several hypotheses have been put forward. The campaign may be part of general Chicom strategy to increase pressure on non-communist countries all along the southern rim of the Asian communist bloc. Several GVN officials, including President Diem, have said that the present DRV tactics may be related to the forthcoming East-West summit meeting, but they do not seem to be clear as to just what this relationship might be. Diem and others have also expressed the view that the DRV is aiming at disruption of the GVN’s economic, social and security programs, many of which have been making steady progress while others, like the agroville program, threaten to weaken the VC position if carried out successfully. The DRV may also have been embittered by its failure to interfere successfully with the GVN National Assembly elections last August and resolved, as a result of this failure, to intensify activities in the South.

GVN Security and Political Weaknesses. At the same time that the DRV guerrilla potential has increased in the South, weaknesses have become more apparent in the GVN security forces. GVN leaders have in recent weeks stressed the need for more anti-guerrilla training of ARVN. The desirability of centralized command in insecure areas and a centralized intelligence service has also become more evident.

[Page 302]

The need for a capable, well-equipped, well-trained, centrally-controlled Civil Guard is even more keenly felt than previously.

Likewise, at the same time, signs of general apathy and considerable dissatisfaction which the VC can play upon have become more evident among the people in rural areas. Fear among the peasants engendered by sustained VC terrorist activities against which the GVN has not succeeded in protecting them is combined with resentment of the GVN because of the methods which are all too often employed by local officials. Coercion rather than suasion are often used by these officials in carrying out the programs decided upon in Saigon. There is a tendency to disregard the desires and feelings of the peasantry by, for instance, taking them away from their harvests to perform community work. The new agroville program requiring large numbers of “volunteer” laborers has accentuated this trend. Improper actions by local officials such as torture, extortion and corruption, many of which have been reported in the press, have also contributed to peasant dissatisfaction. Favoritism and fear of officials and members of the semi-covert Can Lao Party have likewise contributed to this situation.

Diem cannot be completely absolved of blame for this unsatisfactory situation in the rural areas. Considerable evidence has existed that he has not in the past kept himself properly informed of what is going on. Officials have tended to tell him what he wants to hear, largely because of fear of removal if they indicate that mistakes have been made or reply that projects which he is pushing should not be carried out as rapidly as he desires.

GVN Counteractions. Developments during the last month or so have, however, awakened Diem and other officials to the gravity of the present internal security and political situation. As already indicated, they are now emphasizing the need for increased anti-guerrilla training of the security forces. Diem also has indicated that he is establishing a special commando force with “volunteers” from ARVN, the Civil Guard and reservists who had guerrilla experience during the Indochina war. Diem has also stated that the new commander of the Fifth Military Region (the area of greatest insecurity) has been given full powers over all the security forces in that area, thus recognizing the need for centralized command rather than fragmentation of authority among the province chiefs.

Diem has also indicated that he is replacing local officials who are incompetent or have abused their power. He is placing renewed emphasis with these officials on the necessity of winning the confidence of the people and explaining to them the reasons for the government’s programs. He has also indicated that he has ordered a slowdown in the construction of agrovilles, apparently in recognition [Page 303] of the indications that the people were being driven too hard to carry out this new program.

The Embassy’s views on these countermeasures of the GVN as well as on certain other actions which should be taken have been expressed in a separate despatch.3 As the situation develops, the Embassy expects to make additional recommendations.

Elbridge Durbrow

Enclosure 1

SPECIAL REPORT ON INTERNAL SECURITY SITUATION IN VIET-NAM

The Viet Cong attack on the Vietnamese Army installation near Tay Ninh on January 26 is a dramatic illustration of the increasingly aggressive tactics of the Viet Cong and of the difficulty the GVN is having in controlling the internal security situation. The audacity of the Viet Cong in conducting the attack, the likelihood of VC infiltration into ARVN, the indications of secret support of the VC by some of the local populace, the successful planning and coordination in carrying out the attack as opposed to apparent failure of ARVN which had been told there might be an attack to be sufficiently alert for such an attack and effectively counter once the attack had been launched, are indications of many of the problems faced by the GVN and discussed in this report.

Recent Viet Cong Activity

A. General Situation

The increase in Viet Cong activity in recent months can be traced back as far as the middle of September when the assassination and kidnapping rate began to rise. It will be recalled that the Government of Viet-Nam intensified its anti-VC measures during the spring of 1959 when it increased its forces engaged in internal security operations. These operations appear to have forced the VC to curtail their activities for a period of several months, regroup, strengthen and reorganize their cadres and establish new bases. The added precautions taken by the GVN during the period prior to and immediately following the August 30 National Assembly elections further suppressed VC activity. The two important exceptions to this relatively static period of VC operations are the acts of sabotage of farm [Page 304] machinery in May and June (which backfired because of peasant resentment) and the July attack on U.S. Army personnel at the MAAG detachment in Bien Hoa.

By September the VC position was somewhat as follows: The VC had failed to carry out their plans to disrupt the National Assembly elections. This failure placed the VC in a position of reasserting themselves in the countryside or facing a gradual decrease of their influence as the GVN improved security and pushed forward its social and economic reforms.

Reports … indicated that the VC by September had become quite concerned over the possible effects of various GVN programs which were getting underway at that time. The GVN program for regrouping isolated peasants into communities was just beginning, the various youth organizations were becoming active in the villages and the new identity card program promised to create difficulties for many VC cadres who had been provided with false identity papers. The VC propaganda offensive against these programs, which was already underway during August, was intensified in September and VC harassment and violence directed against GVN youth groups, project personnel and village officials began to rise.

B. Assassinations and Kidnappings

The figures presently available indicate that assassinations and kidnappings perpetrated by the VC and other dissidents got off to a slow start in September. The date on which the GVN relaxed its post-election security precautions is not available at the present time, but the VC which committed only 74 assassinations and 4 kidnappings in the first 13 days of September subsequently intensified their activities and by the end of September the total for the month amounted to 22 assassinations and 34 kidnappings, according to evaluated data from various sources. From this point the figures have continued to rise to levels considerably above the average for the past two years. A chart prepared by the Embassy and based as nearly as possible on constant criteria, is included as Annex I to this report. Deaths or persons missing as a result of participation in armed combat are not represented on this chart. Since reports are still incomplete for November and December, the figures for these months are tentative.

Although a complete analysis of assassinations and kidnappings is not available at the present time, it has become fairly apparent that since last summer the VC have added the newly formed GVN youth [Page 305] groups to their list of prime targets which continue to include village officials and NRM cadres. The vast majority of incidents has consistently occurred in the Fifth Military Region with a small number reported in the First and Capital Military Regions. During September and October, the months for which final figures are available, An Xuyen Province topped the list for both assassinations and kidnappings, followed by Kien Giang, Kien Phong and Phong Dinh. Other provinces in the Fifth Military Region, although far from peaceful, vary considerably from month to month.

C. VC Military Type Operations

VC activities involving military type operations such as ambushes, clashes and attacks on GVN military and civil posts have intensified in size and vigor over the past few months although, according to available information, the number of such actions increased only slightly through December. Statistics from GVN sources on actions and casualties of both friendly and enemy forces for the period July–December 1959 are shown in an attachment. The accuracy and value of the casualty statistics is, however, open to serious question. Comparison of ARVN data with that obtained from the NPSS and the SDC shows frequent discrepancies in casualty figures.

The post-election intensification of VC attacks began with the completely successful engagement of two ARVN companies on September 26. The poor performance of ARVN during this operation exposed a number of weaknesses which have been commented upon by many … MAAG sources … . MAAG’s evaluation of the factors contributing to ARVN’s failure include security leaks, inadequate planning, lack of aggressive leadership, failure to communicate information to other participating units and the failure of supporting units to press forward to engage the VC (they were close enough to hear the sound of gunfire at the time). Another factor of importance illustrated in this ambush was the confidence of the VC in their ability to successfully conduct such operations. This self assurance and aggressiveness appear to be characteristic of many actions taken by the VC since September and have probably contributed to the low state of morale reported in GVN security units by … sources.

Earlier in 1959 ARVN units were ordered to conduct operations in Phuoc Thanh Province (VC Resistance Zone “D”). From March 8–19 elements of the 7th Division and a paratroop group conducted an indecisive operation against the VC in this area, mainly because of difficulty in locating the VC. Toward the end of March the elements of the 7th Division were replaced by 3 battalions of the Airborne Group, 2 infantry regiments and other miscellaneous units, to seal off and block in the area. The Vietnamese Air Force employed 5 and later 6 F8F fighter planes to conduct air strikes. These strikes employed [Page 306] rockets, bombs and strafing, but the only known result was the destruction of a number of VC buildings and huts. As the rainy season approached the emphasis was switched from operations to providing security for road construction and other civil works teams. Some patrolling in search of VC was continued throughout the rainy season, but contacts with the VC were minor and infrequent. By September, engineer construction troops had reportedly been set to work doing road work, clearing the forests, planting trees and building houses. The 5th Division was the principal unit engaged in the operation and was still in Phuoc Thanh as of late November, searching for VC. The bulk of the VC had apparently moved on to continue their operations elsewhere.

Major incidents in October were the following: According to a … report an ARVN section (which normally consists of about 45 men) immediately surrendered when attacked by a VC group on October 10 in Kien Phong Province. ARVN, however, denies the occurrence of this incident. On October 30 a group of 80 to 100 VC attacked the Kien An District Office, Kien Giang Province, killing the district chief, a policeman, six CG members and four civilians. Seven civilians were wounded and the VC after releasing about 70 prisoners from the local prison compound carried away 23 weapons and other equipment plus the district payroll, which was apparently the target of the raid. Exact VC casualties are not known, but were estimated to be considerable.

… in December, the VC in An Xuyen, Ba Xuyen, Kien Giang, Phong Dinh, An Giang, Kien Phong, Kien Tuong, and Long An Provinces numbered 2900, about twice the September 1959 figure, divided into groups of 40 to 50 men. This … expressed the opinion that VC attacks in November on isolated Civil Guard posts and ARVN patrol units in Kien Phong Province present an important change in VC strategy in the southwest and that the VC plan to become increasingly active in early 1960 in an effort to prove to the people that the GVN is unable to cope with the internal security situation. An example of this type of activity is the November 14 VC storming of Phong My Market in Kien Phong Province during which they reportedly set fire to a defense militia post, the information hall, three bridges and a motor-boat of the Kien Phong Security Service. Minister of Information Thanh told British Ambassador Parkes on February 22 that the VC’s are burning a large number of information halls, and he is very worried by the lack of protection and retaliation.

By November and December it had become apparent that the VC were operating in larger groups than those used earlier in the year and that their attacks were well planned and vigorously executed. It seems apparent, moreover, from such large scale operations as took place in late January in the provinces of Kien Hoa, Tay Ninh [Page 307] and Phuoc Long (Dong Xoai incident) that the VC have further increased their activities.5 Serious incidents are continuing: ARVN intelligence reports indicate that approximately twenty VC attacked a boat in Kien Giang Province on February 2 killing 12 Civil Guard and 13 civilians and wounding 11 Civil Guard, 2 other security personnel and 5 civilians and that as of February 7 VC terrorism was continuing in Kien Hoa Province.

D. Other Recent VC Activities

A recent … report concerning a group of VC numbering nearly 1000 men (probably exaggerated) entering a town 3 or 4 kilometers from Ben Tre on January 24 and spending most of the day unmolested, spreading VC propaganda is not the only such report of VC boldness. A similar incident involving about 100 armed VC occurred in Kien Giang Province on September 21. The fact that the VC can, and have on a number of occasions, entered fair sized communities, spent several hours or a day propagandizing the population and then retired without meeting GVN resistance would indicate that the VC have an effective intelligence system.

According to … sources, infiltration of the GVN security forces (including ARVN) has been a part of VC planning throughout this period. The GVN suspected that details of the ARVN operation on September 25 and 26 was made known to the VC by persons who had penetrated the government units. Infiltrations have contributed to other VC successes, possibly including the Tay Ninh incident on January 26. The VC, according to a …report, have also made a special effort to obtain ARVN uniforms. Reports have been received … concerning encounters by GVN patrols of what was believed to be an ARVN patrol, but which turned out to be VC.

Increased activity was also noted in Central Viet-Nam although the problem there was less intense than in the South. According to … VC armed strength in Central Viet-Nam in November was about 300. According to … sources the VC in the highlands of Quang Ngai carried out daring attacks during November on the head offices of communal councils and of the NRM. They also destroyed bridges and sections of road in an attempt to sabotage communications. Having gained influence among the Montagnards to the extent of being able to establish bases in the Highlands, the VC were reportedly planning in November to extend their political and military activities to the coastal regions.

[Page 308]

Around midnight on November 5, 25 to 30 VC (50–100 by another estimate) armed with automatic weapons attacked a 15 man squad of the 2nd Battalion, 4th Engineer Group guarding a temporary engineer equipment park near Gia Vuc (on Highway 5) in Quang Ngai Province. Four members of the squad managed to escape but the remainder were questioned and given a propaganda lecture for 2 hours. One dump truck and 1 grader were burned and 1 tractor was damaged. ARVN casualties were 1 killed and 2 wounded. The VC lost 2 dead left at the scene of action. On the following night the timber decking on an Eiffel bridge near Gia Vuc was burned by an estimated 60 Montagnard VC. The damage was repaired but the next night the Montagnard VC returned and again set fire to the decking, this time doing sufficient damage to require 3–4 days to repair.

These incidents, plus a relatively minor incident involving a VC attack on ARVN patrol on September 14 some 35 kilometers south of the town of Quang Ngai are significant in that they represent the first such reports received from Central Viet-Nam of this type of violence in many months. VC activity among the Montagnards, particularly propaganda activity, intended to set the Montagnards against the GVN and its programs for economic and social development in Central Viet-Nam has been the subject of reports by … our consulate at Hue. There have also been a number of reports of VC efforts to establish bases and to recruit Montagnards for guerrilla activity.

During a visit to Kontum in late January our Consul in Hue6 found officials rather worried about the security situation. The Chief of Kontum’s northernmost district of Dak Sut said that during a three week period in January, Communists had forced or persuaded three Montagnard villages to withdraw into the mountains, out of reach of GVN administrators. This District Chief said that he and the Kontum Civil Guard Chief both think that the Communists have a major base in the Quang Nam mountains northeast of Dak Gle (the northermost point on route 14), and predicted that communist activities in northern Kontum and southwest Quang Nam provinces would be stepped up in 1960. Our Consul was not permitted to go all the way to Dak Gle because on January 18 a Civil Guard force patrolling route 14 was fired on by a machine gun on a hilltop between Dak Gle and Dak Rotah.

A large scale sweep intended to flush out Viet Cong in the mountains of Quang Ngai Province has been underway since the end of October 1958. According to information obtained by USOM Public Safety Division, eleven companies of the Civil Guard and one battalion of ARVN and two intelligence companies were employed in [Page 309] the initial pacification phase. The operation was reported by mid-January to have entered a second phase, that of securing the support of the local population. The new chief of Quang Ngai Province, Nguyen Van Tat, told our Consul in January that additional Civil Guard posts are being set up in the Montagnard districts of his province and that the Self Defense Corps will be greatly expanded in the Vietnamese sections. Asked about the progress of the sweep, he was non-committal, but he admitted that the security drive “will not be over for a long time”.

E. DRV Intentions

In May 1959, the Central Committee of the Lao Dong Party passed a resolution or statement stating that the struggle for reunification would have to be carried out by all “appropriate measures”. British observers have taken this to mean measures other than peaceful.

“You must remember we will be in Saigon tomorrow, we will be in Saigon tomorrow”, these words were spoken by Premier Pham van Dong in a conversation with French Consul Georges-Picot on September 12, 1959.

In November, Pham van Dong twice told Canadian Commissioner Erichsen-Brown that “we will drive the Americans into the sea”. DRV General Giap, however, later saw Erichsen-Brown to “reassure” him that DRV intentions are peaceful….

… sources have reported a gradual increase of the infiltration of VC cadres and arms from the DRV over the past few months which has increased the VC strength to about 3000 in the Southwest. (Based on available information … estimates that the Viet Cong strength in all South Viet-Nam is presently 3000–5000 men). Many of these new infiltrators … are cadres who were regrouped in the North at the time of the Geneva Accords and have had a number of years of intensive military and political training. The principal infiltration route of VC cadres from the North continues to be through Laos to Cambodia although reports are received of infiltration by sea. A … source … reports that some of the cadres arriving in SVN from the North have the mission of establishing a VC headquarters to include a general staff, a political section and a supply section and to effect a large-scale reorganization of VC cadres in the southwestern provinces (Fifth Military Region).

… the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) has continued to train its units in guerrilla type warfare in addition to training in conventional warfare. In the opinion of this Western observer, the PAVN could at any time undertake a successful campaign against the GVN utilizing the type of guerrilla tactics undertaken so effectively by the Viet Minh against the French in the Indochina War. Another [Page 310] Western observer, a missionary who resided over thirty years in Viet-Nam, has also stated that PAVN is in excellent condition to carry on guerrilla warfare.

A recent … report indicates that the VC are presently planning to augment their forces, particularly in An Xuyen, Kien Giang, Phong Dinh, Kien Phong and Kien Tuong Province and that they will press general guerrilla warfare in South Viet-Nam during 1960. This guerrilla warfare would be under the flag of the People’s Liberation Movement (reports of a number of recent incidents mention the flying of a red flag with a blue star). The VC reportedly estimate that 70% of the people in the rural areas of South Viet-Nam are either embittered by or indifferent toward the present government. According to this report the VC are convinced they can bring about a coup d’état in 1960, and are presently considering three ways to do this: to incite the GVN military forces to revolt and to penetrate the new government to steer it into a neutralist policy; to force the GVN to use harsh repressive measures against the people by organizing widespread popular uprisings, thereby laying the foundation for open revolt; to set up popular front provisional governments in the Trans-Bassac area as the general guerrilla warfare mentioned above progresses (the VC estimate that they have sufficient penetrations in or control over village level administration to make this possible). The alternative which is selected will, according to the source, depend upon VC progress during the first four months of this year.

President Diem told the Ambassador and General Williams in late February about the capture of a document by GVN security forces outlining VC plans to further step up aggressive attacks all over the country, including Saigon. These operations are planned to begin in the second quarter of 1960….

Military Factors Affecting the Internal Security Situation

GVN internal security operations in 1959 employed an average of 25 ARVN battalions, 44,000 Civil Guards, 43,000 SDC, 6,000 Sûreté, as well as the Gendarmérie, Self Guard Youth Corps and NRM members for which figures are not presently available. This impressive number of personnel has, however, failed to keep VC and dissident activities under control. Numerous high-ranking GVN officials have very recently stressed the necessity of more anti-guerrilla training for the security forces. From a military point of view an outstanding deficiency in the GVN effort has been the government’s inability, or lack of desire, to recognize the following factors: (1) It is actively engaged in an internal war and, therefore, must take the measures which this situation entails. (2) There is a great need for a strong central military command with wide powers for the conduct [Page 311] of internal security operations in the unpacified areas. (3) There is a need for a capable, well-equipped, well-trained, centrally-controlled Civil Guard to take over from the Military in pacified areas.

It cannot be emphasized too strongly that the apparent lack of success in the GVN attempts to reduce the internal threat of the VC until now has stemmed from the lack of unity of command in a single operational commander who has the means and the authority to utilize all of the potential in the area of operations without regard to province or regional boundaries and without regard to the existing political subdivision of the area. Unity of command is the most important basic principle of administration lacking here. The Province Chief structure has caused a breakdown of coordination and a fragmentation of command structure which has blocked an effective attack on the internal security problem.

The fact that the GVN, though striving to bring its military organization to a high state of training, is constantly plagued by the diversion of an average of 25 battalions to an internal security mission is indicative that a serious internal threat exists. The resulting piecemeal commitment of the armed forces has obviously been generally unsatisfactory because of the lack of a strong central command which could effectively coordinate and control all security functions in the area of operations. (See subsequent “GVN Reactions” section re recent action taken to centralize command in the Fifth Military Region).

Political Factors Affecting the Internal Security Situation

It is highly unlikely that any final solution can be found to the internal security situation in South Viet-Nam if the GVN does not enjoy the support and cooperation of the rural population. At the present time indications are that the rural population is generally apathetic towards the Diem Government and there are signs of considerable dissatisfaction and silent opposition. In part this attitude appears to result from widespread fear of the Viet Cong and a belief that the GVN is relatively helpless to protect the rural population from Viet Cong depredations. Unfortunately the longer serious insecurity continues to exist in the countryside despite GVN efforts to control it, the more serious is the effect on the GVN’s prestige. Another effect is a growing belief among the peasants that the Viet Cong will always be here as long as North Viet-Nam remains under Communist control and that they must adjust to live with them. (A realization of the long-range nature of the problem among officials responsible for dealing with it could be an advantage. In Malaya it has taken 11 years to reduce the security situation to the minimum, [Page 312] and it is even more difficult to deal with it in a divided country with long exposed frontiers).

There appear to be other reasons contributing to the difficulty experienced by the GVN in attempting to rally the rural population: a) Until recently it was becoming more and more apparent that Diem was not being given accurate information on the internal security and political situation in rural areas. As late as the end of December, 1959, he was telling all callers how much better the internal security situation had become, despite many doubts raised by his listeners. Information was apparently being presented to him by local officials in such a manner as to reflect well upon the officials giving it. The President’s trips to the provinces have appeared to be carefully “laid on” by local officials. The President himself cannot be absolved entirely from the blame, however, since his system of personal rule which permits direct appeal from the individual provincial authorities to himself, in a sort of intra-executive check and balance system, serves to further weaken the administrative apparatus.

Recently, however, as indicated in the subsequent section on “GVN Reactions”, the Vice President7 and others who are not his usual informers on security matters have spoken frankly with him and he now seems well aware of the situation; b) Provincial and district authorities exercise almost autonomous control in the areas under their jurisdiction. Too often the personnel holding these positions have been incompetent, having been chosen for reason of party loyalty. Moreover, some have tended to view their jobs as a means to personal advancement or financial gain8 often at the cost of the population under their control. Press editorials have attacked local officials for extorting money from peasants, using torture to wring false confessions from innocent people and conducting themselves in such a manner as to reflect adversely on the prestige of the national government. In addition rumors continue to circulate among the population concerning the alleged nefarious activities of and favoritism shown to members of the Can Lao party. While officials have been largely unable to identify and put out of commission Viet Cong undercover [Page 313] cadres among the population, they have often arrested people on the basis of rumors or of denunciations by people who harbor only personal grudges. Police powers justified on the basis of the needs of internal security have reportedly been misused to extort money not only from the peasants but from land owners, merchants and professional people in the towns. This misuse of police powers and the kind of broad scale arrests on suspicion are weakening the support of the population for the regime. On the other hand, the application of swift, summary justice (such as the Special Military Tribunals were created to hand out) designed to protect the population against the Viet Cong threat, if carefully administered and “advertised” as such, can do much to restore a feeling of security;9 c) While the GVN has made an effort to meet the economic and social needs of the rural populations through community development, the construction of schools, hospitals, roads, etc., these projects appear to have enjoyed only a measure of success in creating support for the government and, in fact, in many instances have resulted in resentment. Basically, the problem appears to be that such projects have been imposed on the people without adequate psychological preparation in terms of the benefits to be gained. Since most of these projects call for sacrifice on the part of the population (in the form of allegedly “volunteer” labor in the case of construction, time away from jobs or school in the case of rural youth groups, leaving homes and lands in the case of regrouping isolated peasants), they are bound to be opposed unless they represent a partnership effort for mutual benefit on the part of the population and the government. (See subsequent section on “GVN Reactions” for indications of Diem’s current awareness of this problem.)

The situation may be summed up in the fact that the government has tended to treat the population with suspicion or to coerce it and has been rewarded with an attitude of apathy or resentment. The basic factor which has been lacking is a feeling of rapport between the government and the population. The people have not identified themselves with the government. There has been a general lack of “a sense of mission” in the building of the country among both the local population and local authorities. In the past at least Diem has contributed to this attitude by his constant admonition to the villagers he talks to on his trips throughout the country that they must work harder, do more for themselves, and not complain. He has made little effort to praise them for what they have accomplished or explain the reasons for the demands he places on the population. He has none of the demagogue in him, but is rather still the mandarin.

[Page 314]

Now that he realizes the feelings of the people, it is to be hoped that he will show more solicitude for their needs and feelings, but this will not be easy for him to do.

Possibly another factor adversely affecting the current attitude of the peasants toward the Government is the decline over recent months in the price of paddy. Since the population in the southwestern delta is particularly dependent on paddy for its income, it would be a normal political reaction for this development to increase dissatisfaction with the government.

GVN Reactions to Current Internal Security Situation

President Diem, who had earlier taken the position in conversations with Ambassador Durbrow that the GVN’s security operations had broken up many VC camps and forced them to regroup into larger forces, has modified his assessment considerably after the Tay Ninh attack and other recent manifestations of expanded VC activities. Previously indicating that VC reinforcements had come from Cambodia, Diem in his latest conversation with the Ambassador on February 1210 stated the VC had been reenforced by well-trained forces from North Viet-Nam. In his view the recent step-up in VC activities is basically a somewhat desperate attempt to disrupt the progress of South Viet-Nam. He does not appear to be deeply alarmed, but, on the contrary, feels that with measures he has in mind the situation should greatly improve in a few months. He believes the security forces need more anti-guerrilla training, but also thinks more security forces are needed in order to provide better protection for the entire population. He has called for volunteers from military reservists who had long guerrilla experience during the Indochina War as well as from ARVN and the Civil Guard, and has indicated that over 1000 have already volunteered.

Diem also now shows awareness of many of the political factors which have contributed to the deterioration in internal security. By the end of February in conversations with the Ambassador and other foreign officials Diem has become very frank in admitting that many of the civilian administrators have been incompetent and have abused their power. He has added he is removing these and placing competent men in their jobs whose principal duty will be to pay attention to the needs of the population and make every effort to win their confidence. The President has become quite aware of the adverse reaction of the people to indiscriminate use of methods of coercion in carrying out the government’s programs in rural areas. He explained to the Ambassador at some length on February 22 the urgent [Page 315] need for civilian officials to explain in detail the reasons for the government’s actions in these matters in order that the population will fully understand how they will benefit in the long run.

Ngo dinh Nhu, the President’s brother and political advisor, also told … on February 5 that the security forces need more anti-guerrilla training. He added, however, that political measures are the real key to defense against the VC attacks, and mentioned specifically that GVN officials should consider political aspects of a situation and not just concentrate on rapid physical results to please the President. In late January Vice President Nguyen ngoc Tho, according to a … report, had a discussion with President Diem in which he pointed out his belief that the reports which the President had been receiving on internal security were incorrect as they underestimated the size of the VC network in South Viet-Nam. He reportedly reminded the President that he had told him a year and a half ago that the GVN did not have a correct estimate of VC strength and, unless this were obtained, the time would come when the country would be unable to cope with VC subversion. Privately Tho was said to have placed the blame for GVN loss of support among the peasantry on province chiefs whose only activity was to apply police powers strictly. He also was said to have indicated that both Ngo dinh Nhu and the NRM leaders, through the province chiefs, were responsible for providing completely erroneous and optimistic reports about the security situation. In a conversation with Ambassador Durbrow shortly after the Tay Ninh attack Tho expressed concern over the seriousness of the internal security situation, and he also urged more anti-guerrilla training of the GVN security forces.

Lieutenant General Le Van Ty, Chief of Staff of the Vietnamese Army, has also expressed the view that further anti-guerrilla training is required. In addition, according to MAAG, soon after the Tay Ninh attack a meeting was held by the Assistant Secretary of Defense11 with the Chief of Staff and Corps and Field Commanders at which it was decided to make certain recommendations to the President. These recommendations included adherence to the chain of command by the Presidency; assignment of commanders to be based on recommendations of the General Staff through the Department of Defense to the President as contrasted with recommendation to the President by civilian and political advisors; clarification and definition of the responsibility and authority between the province chiefs, military regional commanders and local troop commanders; and centralization of control of the various intelligence agencies.

Indications have been received that at least some of the ideas which have been expressed by GVN officials are being implemented.

[Page 316]

President Diem has told Ambassador Durbrow that Colonel Nguyen Khanh, newly designated commander of the Fifth Military Region (the southwestern area where insecurity is the worst), has been given full military powers over the security forces of the area regardless of the prerogatives of the province chiefs. Diem also said that the GVN is extending an earlier plan of appointing military officers as deputy province chiefs responsible for security, and has placed them under the control of the military regional commander.

According to a … report, the Assistant Secretary of State for Defense issued a directive on February 1 ordering concentration on anti-guerrilla training and tactics and enforcement of maximum security at all military posts.

Another … report states that President Diem, as a result of recent urgings for improvement in relations between the Government and the peasants, has ordered a slowdown in the program of building regroupment centers (“agrovilles”). Secretary of State for the Presidency Thuan told Ambassador Durbrow on February 17, however, that this program must be continued but perhaps at a slower pace, as there is no way to provide protection to isolated farm houses other than by regrouping such peasants into larger communities. He admitted that the peasants have the normal human reaction of disliking being forced to work on the regroupment centers, but he believes that after the centers have been completed they will see the advantages offered. Diem told the Ambassador on February 22 that, while he must continue to create “agrovilles”, he is not planning to push too fast until one or two pilot towns are in being so that the peasants can learn for themselves the many advantages of this sort of rural organization.

… also reported that the NRM recently dispatched special cadres to the provinces to obtain for the President information on cases of dissatisfaction with high-handed or dictatorial attitudes of local officials. Intelligence committees have also been formed in each province which will report to the President through the Minister of Interior.12 Diem told the Ambassador he had been impressed by the centralized intelligence organization he learned about during his visit to Malaya in mid-February. Diem inferred he is planning to adopt this system.

[Page 317]

Annex I

The number of assassinations and kidnappings by months during the past two years are shown in the following chart:

1958: Jan Feb March April May June Total Total for Six Month Period
Assassinations 10 36 26 17 13 21 123
Kidnappings 25 5 43 12 5 15 105
1958: July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total 1958 Total
Assassinations 11 7 8 15 8 21 70 193
Kidnappings 24 18 24 26 19 20 131 236
1959: Jan Feb March April May June Total
Assassinations 10 11 31 13 16 5 86
Kidnappings 17 6 21 16 22 15 97
1959: July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 1959 Total
Assassinations 16 12 22 29 35 33 147 233
Kidnappings 22 11 34 42 89 48 246 343

Note: Figures compiled by MAAG based on ARVN reports show 96 civilians killed and 37 civilians kidnapped during January and 122 civilians killed, 72 kidnapped in February, 1960. Figures for these months for assassinations and kidnappings may be slightly higher (but will not greatly differ from these figures) after finalization based on other sources.

[Page 318]

Annex II

The figures contained in the tables in this Annex have been extracted from the following monthly reports for July through December:

(1)
Intelligence Summary (MAAG)—Source: ARVN
(2)
Summary Report of Self Defense Corps Activities (MAAG)— Source: SDC
(3)
Statistics of Communist and Rebel Activity in South Viet-Nam … —Source: NPSS

Source (1) (ARVN)

Total actions reported by ARVN are as follows: July 105, August 102, September 118, October 110, November 74, December 111.

July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
Pro-GVN Killed:
ARVN 3 3 15 7 3 6 37
CG 1 3 5 26 12 21 68
SDC 5 1 4 8 3 9 30
Police 2 0 2 4 0 1 9
Civ 12 11 20 37 25 33 138
VC Killed: 98 99 162 104 71 116 650
Pro-GVN Wounded:
ARVN 5 6 27 8 0 13 59
CG 7 5 5 24 6 39 86
SDC 6 6 4 10 8 5 39
Police 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Civ 7 9 32 41 5 17 111
VC Wounded: 1 18 17 31 7 25 99
Pro-GVN Captured/Kidnapped:
ARVN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CG 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
SDC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Police 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Civ 20 7 22 45 96 48 238
VC Captured:
VC 1101 1101 714 568 674 568 4726
Suspects 709 840 392 498 517 454 3410
Total 1801 1941 1106 1066 1191 1022 8316
[Page 319]
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
Deserted from GVN Forces:
ARVN 40 16 28 27 0 27 138
CG 11 24 3 4 0 13 55
SDC 2 1 3 1 0 8 15
Police 0 0 0 0 0
VC Rallied to GVN:
VC 457 263 82 78 40 16 936

Source (2) (SDC)

July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Total
SDC Losses:
Killed 6 1 5 5 12 7 36
Wounded 5 5 8 5 11 7 41
Captured 0 0 0 0 3 10 13
Deserted 0 0 0 0 87 91 178
VC Losses:
Killed 12 11 26 30 27 10 116
Wounded 1 5 3 7 1 19
Captured 90 222 183 241 187 139 1062
Surrendered 2 16 3 13 10 3 47
[Page 320]

Source (3) (NPSS)

July Aug Sept Oct16 Nov16 Dec16 Total
GVN Losses in 5th Military Region:
Killed 25 15 34 - - -
Wounded 21 19 30 - - -
Captured 17 6 38 - - -
Deserted 3 2 2 - - -
Disappeared 0 0 1 - - -
VC Losses in 5th Military Region:
Killed 111 86 143
VC Arrested 1444 1084 891
Suspects
Arrested 395 302 246
Rallies 397 136 46

16 Data not available. [Footnote in the source text.]

  1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, 751K.5/3–760. Secret; Noforn. Drafted by Mendenhall; James T. Rousseau, Second Secretary of Embassy; and Andrew J. Fink III, Second Secretary of Embassy. Sent also to CINCPAC PolAd, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Bangkok, and Hue. This despatch and its enclosure are also printed in United Slates-Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967, Book 10, pp. 1254–1276.
  2. In telegram 1339, the Department of State expressed shock at the Tay Ninh attack and asked for an assessment of its implications. (Department of State, Central Files, 651H.51K/1–760)
  3. See Document 111.
  4. This figure includes four members of the security forces who may have been killed in action since reports simply state that they were “killed” by the VC. [Footnote in the source text.]
  5. See Embassy telegrams 2288 (February 1) 2301 (February 2); FVS 4221, 4222, 4229 and 4227; ARMA CX–9. [Footnote in the source text. Neither of the Embassy telegrams is printed. (Department of State, Central Files, 651H.51K/2–160 and 651H.51K/2–260, respectively) The remaining telegrams have not been further identified.]
  6. Theodore J.C. Heavner.
  7. Nguyen Ngoc Tho.
  8. The local press from time to time reports incidents of extortion and blackmail by local officials. On December 1 Le Song in an editorial cited “numerous cases of abuse of power committed by village police officials such as extortion of money and bribery”. Examples like the following are to be found in various reports in the press and from various … USOM sources:

    On February 13 Tu Do reported that a hamlet chief in Binh Tuong Province had been arrested for posing as a security agent and blackmailing four farmers. A USOM source in July reported that a District Chief of Security in Blao had reportedly been removed from his position for extorting sums of money from wealthy residents who were arrested on charges of being communist sympathizers and had to pay for their release. [Footnote in the source text.]

  9. Ensuing section on “GVN Reactions” shows Diem now aware of incompetence and abuse of power by many officials. [Footnote in the source text.]
  10. See Document 104.
  11. Tran Trung Dung.
  12. Bui Van Thinh.