751G.00/2–2654: Telegram

The Secretary of State to the Embassy at Saigon1

secret

1548. Limit distribution. Saigon’s 1450 repeated Paris 445.2 Reftel most helpful. Department concurs regarding alarmist interpretation here recent military operations but believes balance has now been [Page 1082] restored. Press releases following appearance Acting Secretary and Admiral Radford before Senate and House committees Feb 16 and 18 useful this connection. Realistic appraisal of military situation with resulting confidence in ability Navarre and Franco-Vietnamese forces deliver decisive blows to regular enemy forces in course next fighting season obviously major asset both in field and at conference table. To extent well founded convictions this direction are shared by French public opinion and by military and political leaders we can view future with more confidence. Department agrees generally your analysis over-all situation and also that we must work with French through existing channels. We cannot envisage French acceptance under present circumstances of any overt enlargement terms of reference within which our assistance being furnished.

With reference FOA mission, would appreciate your views whether time ripe for French and ourselves exchange views regarding contributions to be made by French and US to reconstruction and conditions under which those contributions would be made. Would assurance such support strengthen present Vietnamese determination end struggle only under conditions where Franco-US cooperation would be assured to a Vietnam definitely remaining within free world orbit.

Delighted learn of psychological warfare activities under Hellyer’s direction.

Most impressed with possibilities “unconventional warfare.” Inclined belief our help here could be expanded and accelerated and would appreciate your judgment whether renewed approach in Paris would be desirable. Also to what extent do you believe French High Command would consent to direct relationship in this matter with Vietnamese authorities? Thought that there may be some results achievable through such a relationship which French could not attain needs exploring. Department believes that if anything is to be done in this field, it should be done soon.

Would also appreciate your views whether establishment direct relationship at MAAG level with military authorities Vietnam would be desirable or feasible at this time. Matter has been discussed from time to time. Has moment of action arrived? It seems to us direct identification US support with local government without passing through French might produce political assets although we are aware possible drawbacks.

Above has not been discussed other agencies here. Desire your views in order develop departmental position in continuing discussions such other agencies.

Dulles
  1. Drafted by Bonsal of PSA. Repeated to Paris as telegram 2959.
  2. Dated Feb. 15, p. 1046.