795.00/7–950

The British Embassy to the Department of State

secret

Memorandum

The attached message gives the line of an oral reply which Sir David Kelly will make to Mr. Gromyko. This is intended as a first step, which, if the Soviet Union are now genuinely anxious to find a way out of the Korean conflict, may encourage them to show their hand a little further.

[Annex]

Message From Mr. Bevin to Sir David Kelly, Moscow, 9th July, 1950

secret

Following is the line I wish you to take with Mr. Gromyko:—

I am much interested in the attitude taken up by Mr. Gromyko at your last conversation and I am glad to note his statement that the Soviet Government wish for a peaceful settlement. That is also the earnest desire of His Majesty’s Government.

As regards his question whether we have any specific proposals to make, I am well aware of the precise and concrete sense attached by the Soviet Government to the word proposals. (The Russians read into the word proposals far more than we do and are apt to regard them as something by which the proposer is irrevocably bound, just as they regard a “basis of discussion” as something which is firmly agreed. Hence my use of the phrase “preliminary suggestion” in this telegram.) It would be difficult for His Majesty’s Government as a member of the United Nations, to come forward with proposals in this sense. We could not properly do so unless we had assured ourselves that what we proposed carried with it the assent of the other members of the United Nations chiefly concerned. In view of our collective responsibility as a member of the United Nations, we could not, as an individual government, run so far ahead as this. We therefore think it best to make a preliminary suggestion. The Soviet Government may well make the comment that they see nothing new in the preliminary step which we propose. But any step is tremendously important if it leads to a cessation of hostilities and the clearing up of difficulties among members of the United Nations. It therefore seems to us that the influences making for peace ought to join together in order to bring about a cessation of hostilities, without concerning themselves for the moment with other causes of difference which have [Page 339] arisen in the more distant or more recent past in connexion with the Korean question.

I want you therefore to emphasise to Mr. Gromyko that, irrespective of any other consideration, the plain fact is that the hostilities in Korea have arisen from the movement over the 38th parallel by the forces of North Korea. It follows that the best suggestion which His Majesty’s Government, as a member of the United Nations, are in a position to put forward is to urge the Soviet Government—who His Majesty’s Government are glad to note have expressed their desire for a peaceful settlement—to add their efforts to those of other members of the United Nations by using their influence as a member of the United Nations with the North Korean authorities to bring them to cease hostilities and to withdraw their forces to the 38th parallel.

If, as is possible, Mr. Gromyko tries to get you to say how you would see matters developing if the Soviet Government were willing to use their influence with North Korea and produce the desired result, you will have to say that the working out of these matters would fall to be dealt with by the Security Council. What you are now concerned to do is to suggest a step whereby, in the view of his Majesty’s government, the way might be paved for an ultimate solution. If Mr. Gromyko, for his part, has any suggestions to make, you should of course say that you would be very glad to convey them to me.

Mr. Gromyko may also raise other questions such as Chinese representation on the United Nations or Formosa. I suspect that he may also be angling for an opening to suggest a meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Four Powers. This would have the advantage for him, since it would arise out of a Far Eastern issue, of opening the way for the Soviet Government to bring the question of the Japanese Peace Treaty into this forum, which they have (unjustifiably in our view) always wanted to do. You will have to avoid such traps. Your best line would, I think, be to say that, without prejudice to other questions which remain to be settled, the cause of peace is of such over-riding importance that we feel entitled to call upon the Soviet government to lend their assistance. What do they think? Have they any suggestion to make? They and we have an equal interest in bringing hostilities to a close. You are not speaking for any other Government or organisation but for His Majesty’s Government who feel deeply about the dangers of the present situation and make an earnest appeal to the Soviet Government to join their efforts to those of other members of the United Nations and to use their influence in the interest of peace. I want you to drive home the thought that it is essential to stop the fighting in Korea, to get back to methods of peaceful settlement and to promote the restoration of peace.