Policy Planning Staff Files

Memorandum by the Director of the Policy Planning Staff (Nitze) to the Secretary of State

top secret

Mr. Secretary: The Policy Planning Staff has given a great deal of time and thought to the attached document. It would be very helpful to us if, after you have had a chance to read it, you could find a few minutes to give the Staff your reactions.1

Paul H. Nitze
[Annex]
[Extract]

Draft Study Prepared by the Policy Planning Staff

top secret

Annex VIII

NSC 68/1

The Strategy of Freedom2

contents

[Page 405]
Page3
Introduction 1
Part 1—Sources and Nature of the Problem 5
A. The Basic Situation 5
(1) The Pattern of Conflict 5
(2) The Relation of Power and Intention 7
(3) Redressing the Power Balance 10
B. The Factors of Complication 14
(1) Historical Forces as a Source of Difficulty 14
(2) The Fundamental Dilemmas 17
Part 2—The Requirements for Effective Action 22
A. The Qualities to be Sought in the Common Effort 22
(1) Confidence and Will 22
(2) A Sense of Common Purpose 23
B. The Burden and Opportunity of Leadership 27
(1) Leadership and Consent 27
(2) The Criteria of Leadership 32
(3) The Role of the American People 38
Part 3—Channels of Common Action 41
A. The United Nations 41
(1) Political Development 42
(2) Economic Development 45
B. Regional Organizations 47
(1) The Range of Problems 48
(2) The North Atlantic Area 49
(3) Other Groupings 53
C. Economic Collaboration and Mutual Assistance 57
(1) The Reconciliation of Objectives 58
(2) The Criteria of Assistance 60
Part 4—Relations With the Soviet System 64
A. Approach to the People within the Soviet Orbit 64
(1) Relation to the Strategy of Freedom 65
(2) The Techniques of the Effort 67
B. The Problem of Negotiation 70
(1) The Necessity of Receptivity 70
(2) The Range of Issues 72
(3) The Necessity of Review of the Issues 78

introduction

The effort called forth to realize the hope for a peaceful resolution of the world crisis and to provide a basis for victory if such hope fails requires, in the words of NSC 68—

. . . political and economic measures with which and the military shield behind which the free world can work to frustrate the Kremlin design … by the steady development of the moral and material strength of the free world and its projection into the Soviet world in such a way as to bring about an internal change in the Soviet system. …

Again as stated in NSC 68, the requirements must

. . . include a plan for negotiation with the Soviet Union, developed and agreed with our Allies and … consonant with our objectives.

The purpose of this annex is to set forth the political and economic measures entailed in this great undertaking. The military requirements are dealt with elsewhere. The political and economic elements are premised on the assumption of adequacy in scope and timing of [Page 406] the aspects of the effort related to the military shield. A second assumption is that the hope to avoid general war will be realized. It is within the Kremlin’s power to confound such hope. Should it do so, other patterns of action would apply. This paper is not intended to be a presentation of them.

The principle pervading the issues is freedom. The hopes of frustrating the Kremlin design are centered in the strategy of freedom—the term used here to indicate the political and economic lines of action required. This strategy calls for the creation and maintenance of strength at the center, with accompanying action:

1.
To stimulate recognition of and effective resistance to Soviet imperial ambitions and actions, in all their forms.
2.
To secure reliable allies whose strength, effectively organized and combined with our own, will deter—or, if necessary, defeat—Soviet aggression.
3.
To win and hold popular support among all peoples for our objectives of an international order in which peace and freedom will be secure.
4.
To make steady progress in the development and strengthening of the collective institutions necessary to the maintenance of peace and freedom and the advancement of human welfare.
5.
To foster social and economic conditions which will assist in achieving the foregoing objectives.
6.
To reduce the opportunities for and dangers of local revolutions and disturbances which would be adverse to our position and to encourage local revolutionary situations and disturbances when and if legitimate popular and national aspirations would be (fulfilled and the Soviet position would thereby be weakened without offsetting disadvantages to our own.
7.
By all such steps, to establish the base essential to a process of accommodation and adjustment by the Soviet Union, recorded from time to time in the negotiation of agreements corresponding to the relative decline in the capabilities of the Soviet Union.

In pursuing these political and economic lines of action, we must act always in the light of the historical forces at work, the circumstances of the present, and the predictable future. It is not possible to blueprint a comprehensive course of action far ahead. We must expect the unexpected—both favorable opportunities which can be exploited and unfavorable turns which must be countered. We must, therefore, equip ourselves to act or react promptly, decisively, imaginatively. What can be provided is a compass and a direction but not a map of the terrain ahead. The political and economic framework set out is, therefore, not a pattern of action and decision for the next five years but a guide. It will need to be revised continuously, and should at no stage be regarded as a definitive statement of how we will proceed with the tasks ahead.

[Page 407]

This analysis is divided into four sections: the first relating to the basic nature of the situation—the source and nature of the difficulties; the second relating to the precepts which must be applied in the strategy of freedom; the third concerning problems relating to particular channels of international collaboration; and the fourth concerning the problems touching directly upon relations with the Kremlin system.

[Here follows the body of the report—78 pages.]

  1. The source text bears the following marginal notation by Secretary of State Acheson: “I have read all of this with great interest.”
  2. The Annexes of NSC 68/1, September 21, are not printed. The revisions thereof, the annexes of NSC 68/3, December 8, appear on p. 432. NSC 68/1 was accompanied by 10 annexes, including Annex 8, “Long-Term Political and Economic Framework,” prepared by the Economic Cooperation Administration and the Council of Economic Advisers. Annex 8 indicated that a section titled “Political” was under study by the Department of State. The present draft presumably was intended to serve as that “political” section.

    Neither Annex 8, “Long-Term Political and Economic Framework,” nor a revision of it, was among the annexes accompanying NSC 68/3, the annexes to which received National Security Council and Presidential approval on December 14.

  3. The page numbers listed below refer to the source text.