202. Paper by James Q. Reber of the Planning and Coordination Staff of the Central Intelligence Agency1

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION COLLECTION PROGRAM AND THE COORDINATION OF REQUIREMENTS

1.
Coordination of collection requirements which are responsive to the intelligence production programs of the IAC and its member agencies is fundamental to obtain the maximum benefit from the collection activities of the Government. A number of these production programs have been fairly defined. They include: the NIS (now in its eighth year), National Intelligence Estimates with its annual program and postmortem procedures, research in economic, scientific and technical intelligence, and the Watch Committee and the National Indications Center. The recently approved Priority National Intelligence Objectives (DCID–4/4)2 are intended to provide more discriminating guidance than heretofore to these production programs, from which, in the main, requirements for collection stem directly rather than from the DCID–4/4.
2.
Because of the size and number of the research elements in the intelligence community and their remoteness from collection activities, the function of collection requirements is the vital link which warrants constant and careful attention in order to assure that collection activities are supporting, without duplication or other needless collection, the priority production programs.
3.
It is believed that a first step in providing such attention is to bring together in one place the essential, factual material on what collection mechanisms exist and how requirements are today levied and coordinated. The attached paper purports to be an initial, though admittedly incomplete, statement of such.
4.
This paper has been prepared through the cooperation of officers within CIA who are close to and have some responsibility for matters described herein. As it may be amended and improved, it might serve several purposes:
(a)
The Director and the IAC might use it in budget presentations to inform the Bureau of the Budget of this segment of intelligence activities
(b)
It might serve as a bench mark established at this time and place which would later serve as a point of reference and measurement of our program in the future
(c)
It might acquaint any reader with some of the problems and activities involved in the coordination of collection requirements and in ways not previously possible, thus serving as an educational paper
(d)
Insofar as it is complete and authorative, it should serve as a base for those who have the responsibility for seeking to effect improvements in directing the collection of intelligence information toward the most useful purposes.
5.
Facts about big bureaucracy with its many people and many procedures are difficult to come by. Accordingly suggestions from the readers of this document as to how it can be made more accurate and useful would be appreciated.
6.
It has been recommended to the Director by the Board of National Estimates in connection with its proposed review of DCID–4/2 (National Intelligence Objectives)3 that the Director initiate a review of the coordination of collection requirements. Such a review would necessarily require among other things an understanding of the way in which the collection mechanisms themselves are administered, their capabilities and their relations with producers as well as requirements officers. While a general review, such as proposed, is appealing it should also be kept in mind that there are continual efforts directed toward improvement in specific areas. For example, as a means of effecting improvement in the handling of defector exploitation for intelligence purposes the IAC at its meeting of 20 December 1954 instituted certain new arrangements. Of course, a general review and special attention to specific collection problems could go forward hand in hand.
James Q. Reber
4
[Page 580]

Attachment

Paper Prepared in the Central Intelligence Agency5

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION COLLECTION PROGRAM AND THE COORDINATION OF REQUIREMENTS

1.

The Foreign Service of the United States: Instructions to the Foreign Service for collection are in the last analysis the responsibility of the Assistant Secretaries of the respective bureaus in the Department of State. Except for agricultural reporting which is now administered by law directly6 by the Department of Agriculture, the Department of State must provide reporting of interest to the U.S. Government with its many non-intelligence interests as well as to the IAC Community. It must also be recalled that this same Foreign Service has other major responsibilities, namely, representation to foreign governments and protection of U.S. interests abroad. The desk officers in each political bureau depend to a considerable extent upon the intelligence organization of the Department of State for the preparation and coordination of requirements for intelligence reporting.

Increased attention to the collection of information abroad for the use of intelligence is reflected in the new chapter (900) of the Foreign Service Manual which deals with this subject. In the economic field the “R” Area in the Department of State cooperates with the Division of Foreign Service Reporting to insure that insofar as possible available resources of the Foreign Service are not requested to collect information available in Washington and that requirements relevant to national security are given precedence over those for less vital functions of the Government (such as development of information about possible markets for U.S. products abroad). State “R” has invited the assistance of ORR and the Economic Intelligence Committee (EIC) to assist in the preparation of guides for economic reporting. The intelligence organization [Page 581] in State has also invited CIA/OCI to participate in the preparation of instructions for political reporting.

It should also be borne in mind that the “R” Area itself is an important originator of requirements for reporting in the political, cultural and social field and that while it has access to other collection mechanisms, the Foreign Service is a prime collector of information in the area of intelligence assigned to State. The establishment of a national intelligence estimating program and the demand on the “R” Area of State for contributions thereto represent an important influence in guiding the “R” Area to requisition information on gaps of fundamental importance. There are comparable effects upon reporting by virtue of the “R” Area’s participation in the Watch process, as well as in the NIS production.

2.

Peripheral Reporting Program: This program was established as a separate collection device within the Foreign Service under the Chiefs of Mission. Its purpose is to obtain information on the Soviet Bloc countries by the assignment of competent officers to certain posts contiguous to the Soviet Bloc where the potential data on that area is substantial. This was necessary as a means of supplementing the reporting from missions behind the Iron Curtain area where many local restrictions are imposed on our staffs. At present, peripheral reporting units are located in Frankfurt, Vienna, Paris, Tel Aviv and Istanbul. In Frankfurt the peripheral reporting unit prepares comprehensive studies in the political, cultural, sociological and economical fields based on information collected on the USSR; these reports are called SPONGE reports.

The peripheral reporting officers make use of a variety of sources including defectors, escapees, refugees, travelers and officials of other governments located in the same areas as the peripheral units. The original emphasis was upon collection from arrivals from behind the Iron Curtain. Peripheral officers are now encouraged to develop other sources among the indigenous travelers to and from the Soviet Bloc and staffs of other government located in the same countries as the peripheral reporting unit. While the peripheral units are encouraged to develop sources as indicated above, the main sources at present are as follows:

Frankfurt (defectors)

Vienna (refugees)

Paris (émigrés and groups of émigrés)

Tel Aviv (refugees and recent émigrés from Iron Curtain countries)

Istanbul (émigrés and a few arrivals from Bulgaria)

3.

Foreign Map Procurement: The requirements of all the mapping agencies of the U.S. Government for foreign maps are coordinated by CIA and the Interagency Map Procurement Coordinating Committee [Page 582] on which sit the representatives of the mapping agencies. The MPC is chaired by the Chief of the Map Library Division, CIA/ORR, who also serves as the Special Assistant to the Director, Office of Libraries and Intelligence Acquisition, Department of State (also designated informally, “Special Assistant for Maps”). Under the direction of the Special Assistant for Maps, foreign maps are procured through the Department of State and Foreign Service. Although the function of overt collection of maps abroad rests with the Department of State, the geographic research function has been transferred from State to CIA; hence, the CIA direction of a State collection program. Four map procurement officers are stationed in the field and part-time map procurement activity is assigned to other foreign service officers stationed in other areas. Salaries and administrative support of these field officers are the responsibility of State and during recent budget reductions two map procurement officers were dropped despite the efforts of CIA to persuade the Department of State to retain them.

The above program for the collection of foreign maps has been in existence seven years. Procurement has been routinized by the establishment of informal exchange agreements (140) with certain countries under which new map production is received in Washington through the Foreign Service posts.

Requirements of CIA and Department of Defense components for maps, air photography and other map information which is available from U.S. firms engaged overseas in mapping and intelligence photography are prepared in the Map Library Division, ORR/CIA for procurement by CIA/OO/C.

Frequently, an approaching assignment for production of an NIS Chapter IX (Map and Chart Approval) on a given area has provided a stimulus for procurement of foreign maps on that area in time for use in Washington in producing the Chapter. In other cases foreign map requirements are in direct response to individual agency research projects or to recognized gaps in foreign map coverage.

The coordinated interagency map procurement program does not conflict with the map exchange agreements between the mapping components of Defense and the opposite agencies in foreign countries. Some of these agreements pertain to joint mapping programs with other NATO countries. Agreements between the Army Map Service and the NATO countries’ mapping agencies provide the bulk of topographical maps on NATO countries (and their colonies).

4.

Foreign Publications Procurement is coordinated by the DCI in pursuance of the responsibility placed upon him in NSCID–16.7 An interagency [Page 583] committee has been established which seeks to identify those areas in which needed publications may be obtained through the cooperative action of agencies who have collecting capabilities as well as to be alert to new means of procurement. Overt publications procurement in the field is divided among military attachés, collection arms of military commands overseas, and personnel of the Foreign Service. The attachés and overseas commands concentrate on publications required by their parent organizations, while Foreign Service personnel fill the requirements of the Department of State, CIA and about 20 other Government agencies such as the Library of Congress and the Department of Agriculture. For this purpose the Foreign Service maintains at the present time six full-time Publications Procurement Officers (in Moscow, Paris, Berlin, New Delhi, Tokyo, and Hong Kong) and assigns the function on a part-time basis to an officer in other important posts. The degree of coordination and cooperation among service attachés and Foreign Service officers varies greatly from post to post. The Foreign Branch of the CIA Library, serving for this purpose as an operating arm of the Division of Acquisition and Distribution of the Department of State, in the last two years since its establishment, has attempted to improve procurement by formulating more detailed guidance for publications procurement officers, by providing them with evaluation on their efforts, and by working closely with those personnel in the defense departments engaged in preparing collection requirements for the service attachés in order that the most effective field procurement channel may be utilized in any given procurement situation. When publications are not available through overt channels, arrangements are made whenever possible to obtain the materials through clandestine collection by CIA. As a result of the USIA Survey, the NSCID–16 subcommittee on Procurement will explore with USIA the extent to which their library centers abroad can assist in procurement.

5.

Military Attachés: The attachés of the military services are guided by the “Essential Elements of Information” published in one form or another under the direction of the Chiefs of Intelligence in G–2, ONI and AFOIN. The EEI have been developed painstakingly and represent the comprehensive needs of the individual services. Within this general framework specific or ad hoc requirements are levied upon the attachés as current needs arise or, more systematically, as required to meet the needs of each service and the JIC in its service to the JCS, in response to the national intelligence estimating program for military contributions and in response to both the original and maintenance production of NIS sections assigned to the military.

6.
General Comment With Regard to 1 to 5 above: The foregoing is in accordance with the allocation of responsibility for overt collection [Page 584] abroad as outlined in NSCID–2.8 Each agency is free to collect economic and scientific and technical intelligence information in accordance with its needs. Under NSCID–2 injunction, information, by whomever collected, shall immediately be transmitted to the agency most concerned as well as made available to all other interested agencies. These facilities are to be utilized so as to avoid unproductive duplication and uncoordinated overlap; “within budgetary limitations” they are to insure that “full flow of intelligence information which is the major need of all departments and agencies for the accomplishment of their respective missions”. In the field, the senior U.S. representative in each foreign area is responsible for the coordination of “all normal collection activities in his area”. The manner in which this is done will vary from post to post, both in respect to the personalities involved and the size and importance of the mission. In March 1954 the Department of State sent a special instruction to all Chiefs of Mission reiterating the coordinating role of mission chiefs under NSCID–2 and urging maximum use of all available personnel including military attachés. At the same time, the Army, Navy and Air Force dispatched similar messages to all attachés, urging maximum cooperation with mission chiefs in developing coordinated collection programs.
7.

Regular Collection Offices: Each intelligence agency maintains a collection office to coordinate requirements from its research offices, assist their research offices in determining the availability of the information in Washington (either in its own agency or another agency), levy requirements on collectors (either its own collection arm or those of other agencies) and disseminate the information collected against requirements.

CIA/OCD/LD’s liaison officers, initially working through cleared liaison authorities in other (non-IAC) government agencies, ferret through those “non intelligence” government agencies known or believed to have (or capable of obtaining) foreign intelligence. CIA/OCD/LD collects such intelligence either against specific requests or spontaneously.

CIA/OCD/LD administers a debriefing program, making available to CIA the knowledge of government officials who have been abroad. The debriefing program is not limited as to area or subject but is, of course, limited only by the knowledge of the returned officials.

8.

Collection of Foreign Intelligence Within The United States from Non-governmental sources: On a selective basis is the responsibility of CIA [Page 585] OO/C) as a service of common concern (NSCID–7).9 Guidance in this selection is provided by the continuing requirements statements of the research elements of CIA and the other IAC agencies, in addition to consumer evaluations of reports and supplemented by continuous liaison to discuss specific needs and individual sources.

To assure that this service is of maximum value to consumers, conferences are being scheduled at the working level in all of the member agencies. In addition, four specific interagency arrangements are either completed or well on the way to completion:

(a)
Three specialized ATIC officers have been placed in domestic field offices to guide and actually engage in the collection of technical information. The assignment of a fourth officer, trained in air electronics, is expected shortly.
(b)
A similar arrangement has been worked out through G–2 for the assignment of two Signal Corps Intelligence officers to domestic field offices in an effort to increase the quantity and quality of telecommunications-intelligence collection. One of these officers is already being processed.
(c)
Arrangements have been completed with the Director of Intelligence of the Air Force and with the Air Research and Development Command to facilitate the exploitation of civilian employees at the various ARDC centers for intelligence information not otherwise available to the member agencies.
(d)
Tentative arrangements have been concluded with G–2 for a similar program to be established in the near future with the seven Army Technical Services.

A fifth specific effort to produce more effective and coordinated intelligence collection consisted of a program to analyze critically all requirements which have been received by Contact Division from the producing elements of CIA and the other IAC agencies, and to codify in readily usable form all basic requirements currently outstanding.

9.

Radio Monitoring: Under NSCID–610 a central radio monitoring service (CIA/FBID) is established and the monitoring of foreign propaganda and press broadcasts for the collection of intelligence information by other federal agencies is specifically precluded.

Since radio monitoring does not lend itself to exploitation for specific information on specific subjects, guides or “targets” are provided by IAC offices each week. These are requests for translation of what is said by area transmitters in comment on, reaction to, or mention of specific subjects, events or people. Additionally, a list of long-range or [Page 586] standing requirements stated in broad terms is provided quarterly. Both target lists are distributed to field installations in order that the desired information may be selected from the great volume of monitored radio broadcasting.

Specific collection requests, especially on the technical aspects of radio monitoring, but sometimes on the content of radio broadcasts, are levied on CIA/FBID either formally by the requester through CIA/OCD, or informally to the Liaison Officer, FBID.

Additional guidance is obtained from study of intelligence deficiencies and the NIS and NIE programs. Some requirements are self-evident, e.g., radio monitoring coverage of Central Asia provides unique information on an area of the world not otherwise covered to any appreciable extent by intelligence collection activities. Before investing funds and personnel in meeting a requirement such as this, FBID solicits the IAC agencies to determine their interest.

10.
The Collection and Exploitation of Soviet Materials for Intelligence Purposes is carried out under two programs which are coordinated. On the one hand the military has established a committee known as the Joint Technical Intelligence Subcommittee (JTIS) with the responsibility for coordinating military requirements for Soviet materials, relaying them to field components with a capability for collection and coordination of the exploitation of Soviet material. Civilian requirements (those of CIA, State and AEC) are coordinated by a “Sovmat Staff” in CIA/OO which levies requirements against not only foreign service and military collection units but also, when appropriate, against CIA’s clandestine collection service. Through the participation of the Chief of the Sovmat Staff as an Advisor to the Chairman of JTIS coordination between these two programs is provided.
11.
The Travel Folder Program is designed to obtain the maximum information from within the Soviet Orbit by direct personal observations on the part of American officials stationed in U.S. Missions behind the Iron Curtain. Approved by the IAC, the program is supervised by CIA in consultation with the Economic Intelligence Committee. The program consists of the coordination of IAC requirements (mainly economic, scientific, technical, and military), briefing and debriefing of travelers, the preparation of comprehensive reports of their observations, [3½ lines not declassified].
12.
Research Units Abroad sponsored by CIA (strategic divisions) attempt to bring to the field more intimately the kind of guidance which would make field collection more meaningful in terms of headquarters programs. [5 lines not declassified]
13.

Collection of U.S. Files Abroad was undertaken by CIA in 1951. A team microfilmed documents containing intelligence information in the files of the U.S. agencies all over Europe, in anticipation of the possible [Page 587] overruning of Europe by Russia and the consequent loss of the information in such documents. In general, such microfilming was not conducted in response to specific requirements and was mainly composed of industrial data regarding West European countries.

The entire collection of some 2,000 reels of film is available in the CIA Industrial Register. Few of the files microfilmed have been indexed, but the team identified them in terms of subject matter whenever possible and in terms of source or area when subject matter information was not available. Selected portions of the collection have been incorporated into IR files, and a more complete index is being prepared on a low priority basis.

No direct requirements are levied against the file. The IR analysts use this information, among other sources in their files, when incoming requirements indicate its utility, as do other research analysts when using IR files.

14.
Captured Enemy Documents: Plans have been established for coordination in the exploitation of captured enemy documents in wartime under a joint military agency known as the Armed Services Documents Intelligence Center. Civilian agencies requirements will be satisfied in this program by virtue of a CIA representative serving as an Assistant Director in the Center who coordinates the requirements of CIA, State and AEC.
15.
The National Security Agency is guided in its collection activities through a USCIB subcommittee (Intelligence Committee) whose function includes requirements coordination. This subcommittee, composed of the intelligence agencies representatives, operates under a rather highly sophisticated system of identifying priorities.
16.
In the Field of Indications responsibility to improve the coordination of collection is set forth in DCID–1/2.11 The Watch Committee is supposed to “develop and operate on a current and continuing basis the Watch Committee Intelligence Plan for systematizing, energizing and coordinating through the appropriate channels the world-wide collection by U.S. agencies of information and intelligence pertinent to the Watch Committee mission.”
17.
[1 paragraph (24 lines) not declassified]
18.

External Research: Members of the intelligence community, as well as several other Government agencies, sponsor external research projects on foreign areas, thus providing an additional source of foreign intelligence. This research is performed by Government agencies and private institutions, each of them using whatever sources are available to them. Government agencies, contracting for private research on [Page 588] foreign areas, frequently supply such contractors with intelligence information which is, of course, supplemented by the contractors’ own resources. Government agencies conducting research on behalf of other Government agencies are exploited by informal interagency contact and by such regular collection offices as CIA/OCD.

External research on foreign areas, although performed in response to departmental needs, is subject to certain coordination efforts by the intelligence community. These efforts are:

a.
A clearing house for information provided by the External Research Staff, Department of State (ERS), a joint operation of State, CIA and Defense;
b.
Informal monthly discussions among external research administrators of various agencies to exchange information on what they are doing and what needs to be done;
c.
An Advisory Panel on Research in Special Operations appointed by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Research and Development consisting of outside specialists to provide guidance to the Department of Defense. USIA, CIA, State, FOA and OCB are represented on the Panel by associate members; and
d.
On 11 December 1954 the DCI proposed to USIA, State, Defense, OCB and FOA that agencies with intelligence needs in the propaganda and psychological warfare and foreign information fields cooperate in the development of a government-wide program of external research in support of such activities. Each agency would retain complete responsibility for its departmental external research program but would benefit by coordination of its program with other agencies having related missions.

19.
ELINT: Collection of information by the detection, reception and recording of non-communication electronic radiations is carried on by the three services and by CIA/DDP. Analysis of material which has been collected is conducted separately by the Air Force and jointly by Army and Navy through the Army-Navy Electronic Evaluation Group, (NAEEG). There is limited and spasmodic coordination in the field with respect to detection, reception and recording of ELINT collection. There is little or no coordination between the groups working on the analysis of collected material. Present ELINT collection activities carried on by the services are primarily directed toward OB type information such as the identification and location of radio stations, long-range navigation systems and so forth. Insofar as it has developed, the CIA/DDP collection effort is directed toward the detection of new and unusual electronic emanations.
20.

Interrogations of returning POWs, refugees and defectors have been the subject of various activities by the IAC agencies—[19 lines not declassified].

[Page 589]

[1 paragraph (3 lines) not declassified]

Coordination of the U.S. Defector Program at the Washington level is accomplished by the Interagency Defector Committee (IDC). [6½ lines not declassified]

The Armed Services have established a center (Armed Services Prisoner Interrogation Center) to coordinate the exploitation of POWs. CIA, State and AEC’s interests are represented by an Assistant Director at the Center. Although its mission is interrogation of captured prisoners, it participated in the interrogation of American POWs who had been held and then released by the Chinese.

21. Clandestine Collection Activities of the U.S. Government include CIA/FI, which also has access to any intelligence products of clandestine operations, the clandestine services of the three military agencies and AFOAT. The coordination of requirements for clandestine collection by CIA has been effected through the establishment of the Interagency Priorities Committee for Clandestine Collection. Further development in the efficient utilization of all sources of the Government for clandestine collection is being developed through the proposal for agreed activities under NSCID–512 now under negotiation between the Director and the intelligence chiefs of the military agencies. The coordination of information collected by AFOAT and all other sources is assured, insofar as possible, under DCID 11/1.13 In the main, as far as the direction of collection is concerned, the effect of this would be to alert AFOAT in the event that information regarding an atomic explosion by the Russians were detected by one of the services other than AFOAT in order that it could promptly institute collection activity.

22.

Press Monitoring is done by some of the posts of the Foreign Service in order to provide themselves with current press opinion. This press monitoring activity varies from post to post; in Latin America only one post (Rio de Janeiro), in Europe 19 posts, in Far East 11 posts and in Near East and Africa 22 posts conduct press monitoring.

Current monitoring of the press of our two major enemies, USSR and Red China, is performed in Moscow and Hong Kong respectively. In Moscow there is the Joint Press Reading Service (JPRS), [less than 1 line not declassified]. The JPRS reviews and abstracts from the major newspapers and periodicals of the USSR and issues two translated [Page 590] series, Section A covers foreign affairs and Section B domestic news. In addition, abstracts of leading periodicals are prepared separately. Dissemination is made by State within the Government and to a few private institutions. The Hong Kong Press Monitoring Service has access to (a) [2 lines not declassified] as well as (b) to U.S. procured Chinese mainland publications. The HKPMS issues three press summaries titles: Review of the Hong Kong Press (issued almost daily covering the main articles of the Hong Kong press), Summary of the Chinese Mainland Press (produced on the average of three or four issues per week covering the main topics of the Chinese language press and dividing the topics in catagories of subject interest), and Current Background (a study of various topics of political, economic and sociological significance based on press articles extending over an indefinite period of time). Wide dissemination of these press summaries is given within the U.S. Government and to 25 private academic institutions or individuals.

In addition to the press summaries prepared by embassy employees (whether Foreign Service or USIA, etc.) the missions frequently obtain press summaries from other governments. In approximately 15 posts, press summaries of the British are obtained while to a much lesser extent, press summaries prepared by the French are received. In nine posts, press summaries prepared by the host government are received and in one post (Tehran) a press summary prepared by the USSR is received. Dissemination of press summaries back to Washington and within the Government varies from post to post. A review of the press monitoring activities was prepared by State/IAD and distributed within the Government for the information of the users.

No headquarters requirements are levied for overseas press monitoring and consequently no coordination is required.

23.

Photographic Intelligence Collection and Requirements: Intelligence photography is collected from the air, on the ground, or as records from radarscope presentations. The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy operating squadrons and attachés collect approximately 75% and 15% respectively with the rest attributable to U.S. Army, CIA, and other miscellaneous sources. Most of the aerial photography collected by the Army for the Army Map Service is purchased from commercial organizations. CIA concentrates its effort toward the collection of aerial photos from certain firms and foreign governments.

Aerial and ground photographs are required by the intelligence analysts and mapping agencies throughout the IAC to corroborate other intelligence data and fill existing gaps in intelligence. They are essential to the production and maintenance of accurate large-scale topographic maps and the preparation of strategic and tactical target programs (Air Force) now in progress. CIA intelligence analysts require photographic intelligence in support of intelligence objectives, which [Page 591] may be geographic, economic, scientific, or military in nature and to support clandestine operations.

While procedures exist in each agency for the coordination of its photographic requirements, there has been established, on the invitation of AFOIN in 1948, an Interagency Graphics Research Coordinating Group. Orginally, the group was composed of the three services; it was joined by CIA in 1951. This Group, meeting monthly, exchanges information regarding photo requirements, location of desired photography, overseas commercial mapping activities and related matters. Highly classified and highest priority aerial photographic requirements are reviewed and coordinated by JCS Plans and Policy with final concurrence of State, Military and CIA.

  1. Source: National Archives, RG 59, INR Files: Lot 58 D 776, Collection and Dissemination. Secret.
  2. Document 201.
  3. Document 25.
  4. Printed from a copy that bears this typed signature.
  5. Secret. There is no drafting information on the paper.
  6. There are current negotiations between the Departments of State and Agriculture which have resulted in a temporary agreement for the continuance of agricultural reporting on the Soviet Bloc by State. These talks are continuing with regard to State’s assistance to Agriculture for agricultural reporting on the Free World (many areas not covered by AAs [Agricultural Attachés] can be covered in part by State). [Footnote in the original.]
  7. Document 258.
  8. For text, see Foreign Relations, 1945–1950, Emergence of the Intelligence Establishment, Document 425.
  9. Ibid., Document 427.
  10. Ibid., Document 424.
  11. Document 179.
  12. For NSCID No. 5, December 12, 1947, see Foreign Relations, 1945–1950, Emergence of the Intelligence Establishment, Document 423. For the revision of August 28, 1951, see Document 255.
  13. DCID 11/1, December 7, 1954, “Control of Information Regarding Foreign Nuclear Explosions,” is in Central Intelligence Agency, History Staff, Job 84–B00389R, Box 4, Folder: HS/HC–600.