Department of State Disarmament Files

Report by the Commission for Conventional Armaments to the Security Council

S/1372

Letter Dated 4 August 1949 From the Chairman of the Commission for Conventional Armaments Addressed to the President of the Security Council Transmitting a Working Paper and Other Documents

I have the honour to transmit herewith to the Security Council a Working Paper adopted by the Commission for Conventional Armaments at its nineteenth meeting on 1 August 1949, concerning implementation of General Assembly resolution 192 (III) relating to the future work of the Commission.1

[Page 107]

The Commission further decided to transmit, for the Council’s information, the documents of the Commission and its Working Committee relating to the above item. A list of such documents is annexed hereto.2

Ivar Lunde

Chairman
Commission for Conventional Armaments
[Enclosure]

Working Paper Adopted at the 19th Meeting of the Commission for Conventional Armaments Concerning Implementation of General Assembly Resolution of 19 November 1948 Relating to the Future Work of the Commission for Conventional Armaments

Section I

General Considerations

1. Desire expressed by the General Assembly

The General Assembly resolution [192 (III)]3 of 19 November 1948 expresses the desire that the Commisssion for Conventional Armaments, “in carrying out its plan of work, will devote its first attention to formulating proposals for the receipt, checking and publication, by an international organ of control within the framework of the Security Council, of full information to be supplied by Member States with regard to their effectives and their conventional armaments”. (Paragraph 6 of the General Assembly resolution.)

2. Motives for this desire

This desire is motivated by two considerations:

The first is that “the aim of the reduction of conventional armaments and armed forces can only be attained in an atmosphere of real and lasting improvement in international relations”; (Paragraph 3 of the General Assembly resolution).

The second is that any reduction of armaments implies as a prerequisite an exchange between States of exact and authenticated information concerning their conventional armaments and their armed forces.

3. Aims of the General Assembly resolution

Accordingly, the General Assembly resolution has two objectives:

In the first place, to encourage the renewal of international confidence, through a relaxation of existing conditions of secrecy, by placing [Page 108] the States “in possession of precise and verified data as to the level of their respective conventional armaments and armed forces”. (Paragraph 4 of the General Assembly resolution.)

In the second place, to begin forthwith to prepare the way for a future reduction and regulation of armaments and effectives by introducing in the field of international co-operation precedents likely to become useful in the progress which still remains to be achieved in that direction.

4. Nature of proposals to be formulated

Thus are determined two aspects of the proposals to be formulated according to the desire of the General Assembly:

On the one hand, these proposals must be capable of implementation under existing political conditions.

On the other hand, they are not designed to provide of themselves the safeguards which are essential to security, still less to give military advantage to any nation.

5. Resulting limitations

Hence the need for interpreting liberally the phrases “exact and authenticated information”, “full information” and “precise and verified data”, in order to take into account the interests of security as well as the demand for exact data.

This applies particularly to the degree of access by way of inspection for verification purposes which can be agreed to at this time by the participants. As between disclosure of information and adequate verification, the requirements of verification must be paramount.

By virtue of the same premise, the measures to be proposed must also fulfil the following conditions:

As a prerequisite to implementation, they should be accepted by not less than two-thirds of the Member States including all the Permanent Members of the Security Council.

The information to be made available for census and verification according to such proposals should be purely quantitative, subject only to such qualitative specifications as will be indicated later in this document (Section II).

The information will be strictly limited to the existing level of effectives and conventional armaments.

The information will not include data regarding research and experimental materiel; personnel engaged in the operation of such materiel will not, as such, be subject to verification, even though they may be subject to census.

6. Scope of proposals to be formulated

Proposals to be formulated should, within the above limitations, cover the following points:

(1)
Information to be reported, or: scope and nature of census.
(2)
Control of such information, or: scope and nature of verification.
(3)
Organ of control to be set up: status, rights and duties of the control organ and its agents; organization and administration of the control organ; relations of the control organ to the other organs of the United Nations; rights and obligations of Member States of the United Nations; rights and obligations of other States.

7. Proposals contained in this document

Section II of this document only covers points (1) and (2) of the preceding paragraph. The specific proposals or general recommendations which are put forward on those two points are designed to assist in establishing a framework for the international agreement which must eventually sanction the proposals formulated by the Commission for Conventional Armaments.

Section II

Proposals and Recommendations on Census and Verification

a. census

I. Effectives

1. Scope of census

Elements subject to census should include military and paramilitary forces, active and reserve, on full-time and part-time basis.

These elements will be designated by name for each State by the control organ.

2. Nature of census

(a)
Specifications to be furnished
  • The census should indicate the breakdown of total numbers into the following categories:
  • Ground forces
  • Naval forces
  • Air forces
  • Para-military forces and national police forces
  • Active and reserve components of each of the above categories.
(b)
Period to be covered
  • The census should supply the following data for each of the above categories:
  • Strength on a date to be designated by the control organ;
  • Daily average strength for the preceding year;
  • Total effectives released during the preceding year expressed as a percentage of the average strength during the preceding year.
(c)
Forms
  • The above information should be submitted on forms prescribed by the control organ.
(d)
Timing
  • Census reports should be submitted simultaneously by all States.

II. Conventional Armaments

Scope and Nature of Census

1. The census should indicate quantities in the following categories:

Ground forces:

  • Automatic weapons and artillery, classified by type and caliber.
  • Armour, classified by tonnage.

Naval forces:

  • Combatant ships, classified by type and tonnage.

Air forces:

  • Combatant aircraft, classified by type.

2. The census should include total quantities of materiel both in service and in reserve.

3. Provisions applying to the period to be covered, the form, and the timing of “personnel”, census, as indicated in I, 2b, c, and d, above, should apply to the materiel census.

b. verification

I. General Recommendations

1. The control organ should enjoy within the limits indicated above (Section I, paragraph 5) the greatest possible freedom of movement and access to data fully depicting the level of conventional armaments and effectives of each State.

2. The activities to be verified should be specified in the international agreement.

3. The control organ should be empowered to direct investigations by international verification teams which will perform all inspections, spot-checks, and physical counts needed for an adequate crosschecking of the reported information.

4. For the purpose of spot-checks, States would be requested to submit reports showing figures as of any date which the control organ might designate, for each or part of the categories of information covered by the census reports.

5. To resolve doubts which may be raised by one or several governments or by the control organ itself, provision should be made for special supplemental inspections.

II. Scope and Nature

1. Effectives

The complete order of battle should be made available to the control organ.4

[Page 111]

2. Conventional armaments

In addition to the inspection of relevant records, verification should be based upon spot-checks of materiel both in service and in reserve wherever stored.

Section III

Proposals and Recommendations on the International Organ of Control

I. Function of the Control Organ

The function of the Control Organ will be to give effect to the census and verification measures concerning conventional armaments and effectives as set out in Sections I and II, in accordance with the terms of the international agreement which will sanction the adoption of such measures and in compliance with the directives of the Security Council.

II. Relationship of the Control Organ to the Other Organs of the United Nations

The Control Organ will be directly subordinated to the Security Council and will enjoy such relationships to the other organs of the United Nations as result therefrom.

III. Structure of the Control Organ

The Control Organ will consist of:

—a Central Control Authority

—an Inspectorate

—a Secretariat.

IV. The Central Control Authority

1. Function of the Central Control Authority

The function of the Authority will be to ensure the execution of the census and verification measures, including the following responsibilities:

(a)
To interpret the terms of the international agreement concerning these measures and to settle any controversial issue arising therefrom;
(b)
To direct the activities of the Inspectorate; in particular to determine the organization of the Inspectorate according to the specific problems raised by the verification of census reports from each State;
(c)
To produce and distribute to Member States the standard forms of reports to be returned by Member States;
(d)
To set dates for the submission of the reports;
(e)
To submit to the Security Council, for publication, the reports of Member States, the findings of the Inspectorate, and the conclusions of the Authority;
(f)
To determine its own rules of procedure, which should include the provision that decisions on all matters which require voting will be adopted by a simple majority;
(g)
To determine the organization of the Secretariat and to direct its activities so as to fulfil the needs of the Authority and of the Inspectorate.

2. Composition of the Central Control Authority

The Member States represented in the Authority will be those represented in the Security Council.

Each Member State will be represented by one delegate and one deputy delegate. These delegates may be assisted by technical advisers appointed by each Member State.

V. The Inspectorate

1. Function of the Inspectorate

The function of the Inspectorate will be to carry out the verification measures in compliance with the directives of the Authority, including the following responsibilities:

(a)
To carry out checks and cross-checks of the appropriate documents, and inspection of bases, depots, and other installations, necessary for the verification of the personnel and materiel census;
(b)
To adapt verification methods to the specific problems raised in connection with inspection in each State;
(c)
To report immediately to the Authority all discrepancies found and to carry out all additional cross-checks which may be necessary;
(d)
To report to the Authority any disagreement which may arise during the course of inspection;
(e)
To report its findings to the Authority upon the completion of the verification.

2. Composition of the Inspectorate

The Authority will designate members of the Inspectorate by means of selection from lists submitted by each Member State.

This designation should be set up so as to afford the Inspectorate a broadly international composition.

The Inspectorate for each State will not include any national from the State being inspected. However, when a State is being inspected, it will provide a liaison to facilitate the task of the Inspectorate.

3. Status of the Members of the Inspectorate

The members of the Inspectorate will enjoy the status and immunities appropriate to the performance of their functions.

VI. The Secretariat

1. Function of the Secretariat

The function of the Secretariat will be to assist the Authority and the Inspectorate in carrying out their tasks.

[Page 113]

2. Staff of the Secretariat

The staff of the Secretariat will be provided by the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

  1. At its 18th and 19th Meetings, July 25 and August 1, the Commission for Conventional Armaments considered the working paper adopted by the Working Committee (S/C.3/SC.3/21/Rev. 1/Corr. 1). On August 1, it approved the paper by a vote of 8–3 (Soviet Union, Ukraine, and Egypt). At the same meeting, it was also agreed, without a vote, to transmit to the Security Council unamended the Second Draft Progress Report of the Commission (S/C.3/32/Rev. 1—see footnote 3, p. 12) together with resolutions S/C.3/24 and 25 on items 1 and 2 of the CCA Plan of Work which had been adopted at the Commission’s 13th Meeting, August 12, 1948. The report and the two resolutions were transmitted to the Security Council as document S/1371, August 4. The Second Progress Report is not printed. For the text of the resolution on item 1 (terms of reference), see Foreign Relations, 1948, vol. i, Part 1, p. 311, footnote 3. For the text of the resolution on item 2 (general principles), see GA(IV), Suppl. No. 2, p. 71, or Department of State Bulletin, August 29, 1948, p. 267.
  2. Annex not reproduced.
  3. Brackets appear in the source text.
  4. As the result of the approval of United Kingdom amendment S/C.3/SC.3/22, this sentence replaced Section II, Part BII, paragraph 1 of the original French proposal (S/C.3/SC.3/21, May 26) which read as follows: “The administrative plan indicating the general location of forces should he made available to the control organ” (IO Files).