501.BB Korea/2–2848: Telegram

The Secretary of State to the Acting Political Adviser in Korea (Langdon)

restricted
us urgent

65. For Langdon and Mitchell: Inference urtel 115, Feb 281 is that adoption US-sponsored resolution by IC is interpreted by Koreans as triumph for those who favor creation separate south Korea at expense of Korean unity, and that those elements who are against permanent partition of Korea are planning to boycott if not actively oppose elections held pursuant to that resolution.

Dept considers it of greatest importance it be made amply clear Korean people and their leaders US proposal in IC and latter’s adoption [Page 1137] thereof were animated by desire contribute creation united and independent Korea and immediate purpose of projected elections is to establish basis for eventual unification country on democratic basis. As is clearly evident from the record, IC was mindful at all times of importance of doing nothing which would prejudice Korean unity, and acted favorably on US resolution only because it was convinced that at present juncture such action would contribute most to attainment of that goal.

It would be considered unfortunate if Rhee or anyone else were permitted create impression in minds Korean people that proposed elections are designed serve purpose of those who would subordinate eventual unity of Korea to immediate creation of separate south Korea, and if moderate elements or other important segments of south Korean electorate were to boycott elections on that account.

Marshall
  1. Not printed.