890D.01/423

The Chargé in France (Wilson) to the Secretary of State

No. 3021

Sir: I have the honor to refer to your Instruction No. 1440 of August 4, 1936, regarding the negotiations between the French Government and a Syrian delegation looking toward the termination of the mandatory régime and the entrance of Syria, and possibly the Lebanon, into the League of Nations as independent states, and requesting that the matter be brought to the attention of the French Government with pertinent inquiries as to the arrangements contemplated for consultation with the United States regarding the termination of the Mandate, the disposition of the territories in question and the conditions under which these territories would be administered upon the cessation of the mandatory régime.

I called on August 19 on M. de Saint Quentin, Chief of the Africa-Levant Section of the Foreign Office, and discussed the matter with him, leaving with him an Aide-Mémoire, a copy of which is enclosed herewith. M. de Saint Quentin said that the Foreign Office had not yet given any detailed consideration to the matter of consultation with other Powers, that the negotiations going on with the Syrian delegation were for the purpose of drawing up a treaty which would be signed after elections had taken place in Syria and the setting up of a parliamentary government, and it would probably be two or three years before matters would progress so far as to permit of the entrance of Syria, and possibly the Lebanon, into the League of Nations. He said, however, that it was of course in the mind of the French Government [Page 499] to communicate at the appropriate time the text of the treaty reached with Syria to the League of Nations and also to the United States. He said that, without wishing to express a final view, he supposed that the same procedure would be followed vis-à-vis the United States respecting Syria and the Lebanon as had been followed by Great Britain in the case of Iraq. I took occasion, in this connection, to explain to M. de Saint Quentin the difference in the position of the United States with respect to Iraq and our position with respect to Syria and the Lebanon, as set out in the Department’s Instruction under reference.

I have now received a memorandum from the Foreign Office, dated August 25, 1936, in reply to the Aide-Mémoire which I left with M. de Saint Quentin; copies in French and an office translation of this memorandum are transmitted herewith.

Respectfully yours,

Edwin C. Wilson
[Enclosure 1]

The American Embassy to the French Ministry for Foreign Affairs

Aide-Mémoire

In view of the current negotiations between the French Government and a Syrian delegation, looking toward the termination of the mandatory régime and the entrance of Syria, and possibly the Lebanon, into the League of Nations as independent states, it becomes important to make provision for the future respecting the rights of the United States and its nationals in those states under the new conditions which will prevail. The Government of the United States, therefore, desires to bring this matter to the attention of the French Government and to inquire what arrangements the French Government contemplates with respect to consultation with the United States concerning the termination of the Mandate, the disposition of the territories of Syria and the Lebanon, and the conditions under which those territories are to be administered upon the cessation of the mandatory régime.

In connection with this matter, reference is made to Article 6 of the Convention between the United States and France, signed at Paris on April 4, 1924, regarding the rights of the two Governments and their respective nationals in Syria and the Lebanon, which reads as follows:

“Nothing contained in the present convention shall be affected by any modification which may be made in the terms of the mandate as recited above unless such modification shall have been assented to by the United States.”

Paris, August 19, 1936.

[Page 500]
[Enclosure 2—Translation]

The French Ministry for Foreign Affairs to the American Embassy

In an Aide-Mémoire dated the 19th of this month the Embassy of the United States of America, in view of the current negotiations between the Ministry for Foreign Affairs and the Syrian Delegation, was good enough to inquire what arrangements the French Government contemplates with respect to consultation with the Government of the United States concerning the termination of the Mandate and the consequences of this termination.

The foregoing Aide-Mémoire refers to Article 6 of the Franco-American Convention of April 4, 1924.

In reply to this Aide-Mémoire, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs has the honor to inform the Embassy of the United States of America that the informal negotiations at present in course with the Syrian Delegation have as their essential object the preparation of official negotiations which can only be opened after the Syrian elections and the constitution at Damascus of a parliamentary government.

At the close of these official negotiations and after the ratification of the agreements which will mark their conclusion, the text of these agreements will be communicated to the League of Nations. The French Government intends, at the same time, to communicate the text thereof to the Government of the United States of America.

Without awaiting, however, this communication, the Ministry for Foreign Affairs is already in a position to inform the Embassy of the United States that the Franco-Syrian and Franco-Lebanon treaties will be closely inspired by the Anglo-Iraq Treaty of 1932 [1930].53 In conformity with the Iraq precedent, the two treaties will include a transfer clause to the Syrian Government of the rights and obligations resulting from any treaties, conventions or other international acts concluded by the French Government as regards Syria, or in its name.

  1. Apparently a reference to the Anglo-Iraq Treaty, June 30, 1930; for text, see British Cmd. 3797, Iraq No. 15 (1931): Treaty of Alliance, etc., or League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. cxxxii, p. 363.