800.51W89 Finland/81

President Roosevelt to the Acting Secretary of State

These Treasury Department figures17 carry out my thought precisely. Do you think that the lesser annual payments on the forty-year plan and the still smaller payments on the fifty-year plan are counterbalanced by the reduction in the total amount to be paid under the five-year plan? In other words, [Page 560]

30 years—no interest—equals $5,854,903.
40 years—1% interest—equals 7,132,550.
50 years—1½% interest—equals 8,364,265.

In your judgment, if you were representing Finland, would you recommend the thirty-year—no interest—plan even though this involves larger annual payments? I want the Finnish Government, of course, to accept the thirty-year plan.

If you think this will attract them and that they will go through with it, I take it the next step will be a tentative agreement, and you can tell them that I would submit such an agreement to the Congress for approval.

F[ranklin] D. R[oosevelt]
  1. Post, p. 561.