File No. 165.102/907

The Ambassador in Great Britain ( Page ) to the Secretary of State

No. 3330

Sir: Referring to the Department’s cablegram No. 3084 of March 23 and to my telegraphic reply No. 4018 of the 25th instant,1 in relation to the shipment of cyanide of German origin to the United States, I have the honor to transmit herewith, for the information of the Department, a copy of the note, dated the 22d instant, which has been received from the Foreign Office in response to my further representations in the premises, and which sets forth the reasons for the attitude which the British Government have adopted in regard to this matter.

I have [etc.]

Walter Hines Page
[Enclosure]

The British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs ( Grey ) to the American Ambassador ( Page )

No. 47797/C

Your Excellency: With reference to the memorandum which your excellency was good enough to communicate to this Department on the 7th instant relative to the shipment of German cyanide to the United States of America, your excellency will doubtless remember, as I had the honour to inform your excellency in my note of the 8th instant, that this matter has already formed the subject of communications to the State Department through His Majesty’s Ambassador in Washington.

From the information at the disposal of His Majesty’s Government they are led to believe that the shortage of cyanide in the United States of America, and the demand for its importation into that country from Germany, is [Page 566] artificially created by the Roessler-Hasslacher Company with the object of keeping in German hands the interest of supplying the United States of America with cyanide, of engineering an agitation against His Majesty’s Government, and of creating credits for Germany in the United States.

The Gold and Silver Refinery at Frankfort on the Main was formerly the Roessler Aktiengesellschaft of Frankfort, and two members of the present Frankfort concern, Franz Roessler and Paul Mausolff, are respectively vice president and secretary of the Roessler-Hasslacher Company in the United States. Half of the stock of the latter company, is, I am informed, owned in Germany.

Before the war the United Kingdom depended largely on Germany for supplies of cyanide, but now the supply is being derived from domestic factories in this country. There would appear to be no reasons why the requirements of the United States should not be met from local supplies, as it is reported that the largest part of the plant for producing cyanide at Perth Amboy, New Jersey, is still in existence.

I need hardly say that His Majesty’s Government would view with the greatest regret any injury done to the United States mining or textile industries, but they are unaware to what extent this could happen except by deliberate intrigues on the part of the Roessler and Hasslacher Company.

I would add that this firm originally put forward their application for permission to import the cyanide on the ground that the goods had been ordered before March 1, 1915, and that they were under an obligation to pay for them whether received or not. As soon as this application was refused, the company cancelled the order, thereby showing that there was no binding contract and that they were under no obligation to pay for the cyanide stated to have been ordered. This fact, coupled with the German complexion of the applicants, has naturally led His Majesty’s Government to accept the company’s statements with considerable hesitation and has caused the whole agitation to appear suspect.

In the final paragraph of the memorandum under reply, your excellency stated that His Majesty’s Ambassador in Washington had assured the Secretary of Commerce that applications would be granted by His Majesty’s Government for goods that were necessary to American industries. The only assurance of the kind on the part of His Majesty’s Government which I have been able to trace is that contained in paragraph 16 of the note which I had the honour to address to your excellency on June 17 last, but your excellency will notice that that assurance refers only to goods proved to have been paid for before March 1, 1915. In the light of subsequent concessions made by His Majesty’s Government it might be assumed that this assurance extended to goods ordered prior to that date, for which a legal obligation to pay on delivery at the factory is involved. The application of the Roessler and Hasslacher Company, however, refers to goods which do not comply with either of the above conditions.

I have already instructed His Majesty’s Ambassador in Washington by telegraph to explain to the Secretary of State the above points.

I have [etc.]

For the Secretary of State:
M. de Bunsen
  1. Not printed.