File No. 763.72112/2752

The Ambassador in France (Sharp) to the Secretary of State

No. 3392

Sir: In confirmation of my telegrams No. 1479,1 1480,2 of July 8, 1916, relating to a memorandum3 and decree published in the Journal official of July 8, 1916, stating that the French and British Governments would no longer be governed by the rules of the Declaration of London in maritime warfare, I have the honor to enclose herewith, in copy and translation, the complete text of the memorandum and decree as it appeared in the Journal officiel. The memorandum merely gives the reasons of the Allies for abandoning the Declaration of London, while the decree specifies the conditions under which ships carrying merchandise of a contraband nature will henceforth be liable to capture.

I may add that the memorandum was sent to me by the Minister for Foreign Affairs with the request that it be transmitted to the Government of the United States.

I have [etc.]

For the Ambassador:
Robert Woods Bliss
[Enclosure—Translation]

Decree repealing previous decrees relating to the Declaration of London, with report of reasons therefor

Report to the President of the French Republic

Mr. President: By decree of August 25, 1914, later superseded by the decree of November 6, of the same year, the Government of the Republic, in agreement with its allies, made the rules of international maritime law, formulated by the declaration signed in London on February 26, 1909, and which remained without ratification, applicable.

Experience having, little by little, led to the conclusion that these rules were not susceptible of assuring for the belligerents the exercise of the rights accruing to them from the general principles of the law of nations, several modifications were successively made. Certain doubts and certain obscurity were the result of this. It seems opportune to eliminate them by suppressing entirely the application of the rules formulated at London and for us to observe the principles of international law such as they have been for a long time consecrated by French legislation as well as by the treaties in force and whose application is assured by naval instructions concerning international law in time of war, published in the Official Bulletin of Marine of January 30, 1916.

The same point of view has been adopted by our allies and appropriate measures have been taken by them to maintain in this, as well as in other matters, unity of action and uniformity of practice in the conduct of hostilities.

It is under these conditions and with this spirit that the memorandum hereto annexed, addressed by the Allied Governments to the neutral governments, is conceived.

According to our regulation (rule of July 26, 1778, Article 1), ships carrying contraband are not susceptible of confiscation unless the merchandise forms [Page 417] more than three-fourths of the value of the entire cargo; but this restriction is subordinated to an identical practice on the part of the enemy, the Governments of Germany and Austria-Hungary prescribe confiscation when contraband merchandise forms, either by its value, or by its weight, or by its bulk, or by its burden, more than one-half the cargo. There is, therefore, reason to follow an analogous rule, which our allies propose to observe likewise.

On the other hand, our regulation above mentioned (Article 1), clearly states the principle according to which contraband merchandise may be seized when it is intended for the enemy and, in this respect, this text makes no restriction or limitation and no distinction between cases where the hostile destination of the merchandise is direct or indirect, manifest or dissimulated.

The adoption of the rules of the Declaration of London had to be accompanied in the decrees of application by certain dispositions intended to exclude restrictions or to complete the stipulations which the Declaration of London had consecrated as a conventional transaction between contracting powers. Although liability to seizure of contraband merchandise, in case of hostile destination indirect and dissimulated had been elucidated by jurisprudence (prize court [conseil], May 26, 1855, the case of the Vrow-Houwina) the fear was expressed that the abrogation of these decrees might give rise to doubts and it has seemed necessary to recall certain circumstances from which, if they are established, one is entitled to deduct, in default of proof to the contrary, the hostile destination of a contraband cargo.

If these different considerations seem to you justified, we beg of you to sign the project of the following decree.

With the assurance [etc.]

The President of the Council,
Minister of Foreign Affairs
,
Aristide Briand
The Minister of War,
Roques
The Minister of Marine,
Lacaze
The Minister of Colonies,
Gaston Doumergue

decree

The President of the French Republic, on the report of the President of the Council, Minister of Foreign Affairs, of the Ministers of War, Marine, and Colonies,

In view of the decrees of November 6, 1914, of October 23, 1915, and of April 12, 1916;

In view of the maritime decree of August 1681, Book III, title 9, the regulation of July 26, 1778, the decree of the consuls of 29 Frimaire, An VIII;

In view of the Declaration of Paris of April 16, 1856, and the conventions signed at The Hague on October 18, 1907;

Decrees:

Article 1. The decree of November 6, 1914, making applicable with certain modifications and additions the rules formulated by the Declaration of London of February 26, 1909, concerning the law of maritime warfare, as well as the decrees of October 23, 1915, and of April 12, 1916, adding new modifications to the said rules, are hereby repealed.

Article 2. Whenever contraband merchandise seized on a ship forms by its value, its weight, its volume, or its burden more than one-half of the cargo, the ship and its entire cargo are subject to confiscation.

Article 3. If the documents accompanying a cargo constituting by its nature contraband of war and found on board a ship bound for a country bordering the enemy countries or a country occupied by the enemy do not specify the final and definitive destination of the said cargo in a neutral country, or if the importation into the said neutral country of the articles composing the cargo is out of proportion to normal importation, implying an ulterior hostile destination, the said cargo shall be subject to capture unless the interested parties can prove that the destination was really innocent.

[Page 418]

Article 4. The President of the Council, Minister for Foreign Affairs, the Ministers of War, Marine, and Colonies, are charged, each within his own province, with the execution of the present decree.


R. Poincaré

By the President of the Republic:
The President of the Council,
Minister of Foreign Affairs
,
Aristide Briand
The Minister of War,
Roques
The Minister of Marine,
Lacaze
The Minister of Colonies,
Gaston Doumergue

  1. Ante, p. 408.
  2. Not printed.
  3. Not printed; it is identical with the memorandum enclosed in despatch No. 4181 from the Ambassador in Great Britain, ante, p. 141.