File No. 865.111/17

Chargé Jay to the Secretary of State

[Extract]
No. 496

Sir: Referring to the Embassy’s telegrams Nos. 633 and 634 of March 4 and 6 and to the Department’s reply No. 548, May 12, I have the honor to enclose herewith a copy of a note which I have addressed to-day to the Minister for Foreign Affairs in order to place on record the views of the Department as well as those which I have expressed verbally at the Foreign Office on this subject.

I was much gratified to learn from the Department’s telegram that no other belligerent country, including those which do not possess naturalization treaties with the United States, is making use of this means to secure the return for military duty of their former citizens, and I consider this argument should have great weight with the Italian Government.

[Page 416]

I am following up the matter personally at the Foreign Office and believe that these obnoxious measures will be, if not actually withdrawn officially, at least not enforced in the case of wives and children bearing valid American passports.

I have [etc.]

Peter S. Jay
[Inclosure]

Chargé Jay to the Minister for Foreign Affairs

Excellency: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your excellency’s note of the 3d instant, in reply to this Embassy’s note of February 17, in which the Ambassador drew attention to the fact that the wives and children of naturalized American citizens of Italian origin wishing to join their husbands and fathers in the United States found themselves prevented from so doing because of obstructions placed in the way of their departure from the Kingdom by the military authorities.

Your excellency, after recapitulating certain special cases in which permission to leave Italy had been granted, states:

The last named, Sciulli Vincenza, was, however, definitely refused a passport, it having been ascertained that it was her intention to join her husband, Nicola de Julus, whose class and category had already been called to arms.

The Royal Government, as a matter of fact does not consider it opportune to issue passports to go abroad to the families of those whose classes or categories have already been under arms, or which are liable to be called in the near future.

The Embassy had hoped, as had been shown in Mr. Page’s previous communications on this subject, that the detention in Italy of the wives and children of naturalized American citizens whose husbands and fathers were considered by the Royal authorities to be liable for military service was due to possible over-zeal on the part of the local authorities and not to the direct orders of the Royal Government.

I am now under telegraphic instructions from my Government to draw special attention to the fact that Italy is the only country, even at the present time of war, which is holding the wives and children of naturalized American citizens in order to induce the latter to return to Italy for military service, and I am to impress upon your excellency that the Government of the United States earnestly desires that the wives and children of naturalized American citizens now in Italy be permitted to return freely to the United States.

As the governments of none of the other belligerent nations, including those which, like Italy, do not possess naturalization treaties with the United States, are detaining the wives and children of naturalized American citzens who have failed to return for military service to the country of their origin; and in view of the great importance attached to this question by my Government, I earnestly hope that your excellency will cause suitable instructions to be given to the local authorities permitting the unrestricted departure of all women and children of this class who may be furnished with valid American passports.

I avail [etc.]

Peter S. Jay