File No. 711.3221

Ambassador Morgan to the Secretary of State

[Extract]
No. 795

Sir: Referring to the Department’s unnumbered instruction of May 29, 1915,3 and to the Department’s telegraphic circular instruction of April 1, 1916,4 I have the honor to enclose a copy, both in Portuguese and English, of a note which the Brazilian Foreign Office addressed to this Embassy on May 30 last. These communications referred to the modifications which the Department suggested in the 31st article of the Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation which was concluded between the United States and His Majesty, the Emperor of Brazil, on the 12th of December, 1828, on account of the Act of the United States Congress, approved March 4, 1915, entitled “An Act to protect the welfare of American seamen” etc.

The Brazilian Foreign Office, in its note above referred to, reminds the Embassy that the Treaty of December 12, 1828, “has been greatly modified since that date”, and that “on December 12, 1841, all provisions which had reference to commerce and navigation were withdrawn” and only those articles remained in effect which related to peace and friendship.

Article 31 was one of those which were withdrawn.

I have [etc.]

Edwin V. Morgan
[Page 37]
[Inclosure—Translation]

The Minister for Foreign Affairs to Ambassador Morgan

Mr. Ambassador: I have the honor to reply, with some delay which has arisen through various unforeseen circumstances, of note No. 252 of the 26th of June last,5 in which your excellency, acting under instructions from your Government, proposes to the Brazilian Government the abrogation of Article 31 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship, Navigation and Commerce, into which the two countries entered on December 12th, 1828.

This abrogation, as your excellency says, has become necessary in view of Articles 16 and 17 of the law which the American Congress passed on March 4, 1915, which provided that, at the expiration of certain fixed periods after they have been denounced, all clauses of the treaties which the United States and other Powers have ratified, relative to the imprisonment and reciprocal delivery of officers and sailors who shall have deserted from merchant ships, shall become null and void.

Your excellency is certainly aware that the Treaty of December 12, 1828, between Brazil and the United States of America has been greatly modified since that date for, on December 12, 1841, all provisions which had reference to commerce and navigation were withdrawn, those remaining in effect relating only to peace and friendship. Among the former were included those covered by Article 31, being inherent, by their nature, to commerce and navigation.

Under these circumstances the suggested abrogation of Article 31, will be Unnecessary because, according to the above statement, it was set aside in the year 1841. It is probable that deserters from American merchant ships have been delivered to their respective consuls subsequent to that date but this has been done as a general measure of police power and at the request or petition of foreign consuls. No further constraint other than this shall be suffered by deserters from American ships.

In this case, therefore, and for the purpose which the American Government has in view, the present declaration of the Brazilian Government is sufficient and makes unnecessary any further formal action which, depending for its effect on the action of Congress would only entail further delay.

I have [etc.].

Lauro Müller
  1. For. Rel. 1915, p. 3.
  2. Printed ante, p. 33.
  3. Not printed.