File No. 893.77/1573

Minister Reinsch to the Secretary of State

No. 1266

Sir: In continuation of my despatch No. 1252 of the 31st ultimo, reporting on the protest made by the Russian Minister against the construction of a railway from Fengchen to Ninghsia, I have the honor to enclose copies of memoranda of conversations with the Russian Minister and with his excellency Hsu Shih-ying, Minister of Communications, on November 7.2

In order to protect general American interests in the region affected, it was necessary for me to take a strong position with the Minister of Communications, notwithstanding my knowledge that the International Corporation did not desire at present to proceed with the railway.

Upon receipt of your telegraphic instruction of November 2, I first orally informed the Minister of Communications specifically of the position of the American Government; and I have now, also, addressed a note to the Foreign Office on this matter, a copy of which is enclosed. The status of the northern railway at the present time is that the claim to the right to build it has been asserted by both the American and Chinese Governments, but that the execution of the construction is to be postponed until one or more of the other lines have been commenced.

The Chinese Government has modified the alignment as granted in the original contract as from Hengchoufu to Nanning, so as to make Chuchow (in Hunan) the northern terminal, the railway to proceed thence to Nanning by way of Kweilin and Liuchowfu. There is also added a branch line from Liuchowfu to Sunchow and Yam-chow, a port on the Gulf of Tongking. The railway is to be known as the “Chu-Chin Railway,” the latter syllable referring to the coastal region of the Gulf of Tongking. The managing director of this line has been appointed, and surveying parties are preparing to leave Peking within a week.

I have [etc.]

Paul S. Reinch
[Page 207]
[Inclosure.]

Minister Reinsch to the Acting Minister for Foreign Affairs

No. 532

Excellency: Through the courtesy of your excellency’s Ministry I have been informed of the protest made by the Russian Legation on account of the granting to American citizens of the right to finance and construct a railway from Fengchen to Ninghsia. Under instructions from my Government, I have the honor to notify you that the position of the American Government concerning the right of American citizens to undertake the construction of this railway agrees with that taken by the Chinese Government. The alignment of this railway is not embraced in the scope of the Chinese Government’s note to the Russian Legation of June 1, 1899, as it does not run from the region of Peking toward the Russian border, nor is it a branch of the Peking-Kalgan Railway. The right to prevent Americans from operating in the region affected by the Fengchen-Ninghsia line could therefore be founded only upon a claim to an exclusive sphere of influence there, which the American Government cannot recognize. Moreover, as the Russian Government itself in 1910 suggested that American capitalists should undertake the financing of the Kalgan-Urga Railway, American activity in a region far more extended than that affected by the present concession was as late as 1910 admitted by the Russian Government to be in accord with its rights and interests. The exclusion of Americans from the region in question, beyond specific concessions made to the Russian Government, would also not be in accord with the assurance given by the Russian Government to the American Ambassador at Petrograd on August 22 [23], 1916, to the effect that it is the definite Russian policy to maintain unimpaired the principal of equal opportunity for the commerce of all nations in China.21

I avail myself [etc.]

Paul S. Reinsch
  1. Not printed.
  2. See under Japan, Treaty with Russia, Telegram No. 721 from Ambassador Francis, Aug. 23, 1916.