File No. 812.00/1808.

The President to the Secretary of State.

My Dear Mr. Secretary: I inclose herewith a copy of a letter which I have written, after a consideration of the discussion to-day, to the Secretary of the Treasury to guide him in the conduct of the business of the customhouse at El Paso.

I have sent a copy of this letter to the Attorney General and the Secretary of War.

Sincerely, yours,

Wm. H. Taft.

[Inclosure.]

Sir: After a conference with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, I have reached a conclusion as to your duty in permitting merchandise, and especially arms and munitions of war, to pass through the customhouse [Page 483] at El Paso, Tex., into the adjoining town of Juarez, in the Mexican Province of Chihuahua. The forces of the insurrection against the existing Mexican Government have taken Juarez and are now in possession. This does not alter or affect the duty of the Government to allow merchandise of all kinds in usual course of commerce to pass through its customhouse for delivery upon the other side of the border into Juarez. There is no rule of international law that forbids. The rule of international law and our so-called neutrality statutes do not seem to differ in this regard. The insurrectos can hot be permitted to use El Paso as a base of operations from which to equip and arm their forces. In other words, they may not establish a depot and maintain storehouses in El Paso and, from time to time, withdraw from there the supplies they need, whether this be food or munitions of war. But international law favors the continuance of commercial transactions and holds them innocent in a neutral country until those transactions become really a part of a military operation against a friendly government. The mere sale, however, of supplies in El Paso to Mexicans, whether insurrectos or supporters of the Government, and their delivery across the border, without more, is not a violation of international law or of the neutrality statute.

It will be truly said that the possession of a town like Juarez by the insurrectos, therefore, gives them a great advantage in that by purchase across the border they can make a depot of supplies in Juarez obtained by purchase from Americans in El Paso or other places in the United States. This may be, but it grows out of the weakness or the misfortune of the Mexican Government, for which we are not responsible, and it does not change our duty or the right of persons in our jurisdiction to carry on legitimate business.

Unless, therefore, the guns and ammunition are presented to you under circumstances showing that their transportation is within the inhibition of the law, as above stated, you will allow them to pass as the subject of legitimate commerce.

Sincerely, yours,

Wm. H. Taft.