File No. 211.54/1.

The Secretary of State to the Swiss Chargé d’Affaires.

No. 89

Sir: Referring to your note of the 5th ultimo, in regard to the expenses incurred in connection with the extradition of certain Swiss citizens, in which note the position was taken that under the provisions of Article XIII of the treaty of extradition between the two countries no charge can properly be made for marshals’ fees, I have now the honor to inclose for your information a copy of a letter on the subject from the Attorney General, to whom the matter was referred, as the act of June 28, 1902, transferred the settlement of accounts for extradition expenses to the Department of Justice.

It appears from the Attorney General’s letter that he takes the same view of the matter as that expressed in your note, and that the marshals’ fees in the cases referred to in the note were inadverently charged.

Accept, etc.,

P. C. Knox.
[Inclosure.]

The Attorney General to the Secretary of State.

Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 30th ultimo,1 in, which you ask the advice of this department as to whether, under the treaty existing between the United States and the Swiss Confederation, United States marshals have the right to charge “fees” in extradition cases.

Article XIII of the treaty concluded May 14, 1900, between Switzerland and the United States (31 Stats. 1933) provides that the State making the demand shall not be charged for the services of such officials of the Government, upon which the demand is made, as receive a fixed salary.

By the act of May 28, 1896 (sec. 9, 29 Stats., 181), marshals in the various judicial districts were placed upon a salary basis instead of fees, and it seems that, under the law and the treaty, the Republic of Switzerland has inadvertently been charged with fees in the cases set out in the memorandum of the chargé d’affaires of that country in this city. Respectfully,

(For the Attorney General)
Winfred T. Denison.
  1. Not printed.