Mr. Taylor to Mr. Sherman.

No. 716.]

Sir: On the 23d instant I had the honor to send you the following telegram in cipher:

Order sent by cable Havana allowing shipment of Hernsheim Brothers’ tobacco.

I also have the honor to inclose herein a copy, with translation, of a note received from the Spanish Government in reference to the disposition made by it of the seven tobacco cases named therein. From this you will see that four of the seven of these cases, including that of Hernsheim Brothers, have already been decided favorably, and that in the three remaining cases further proof may be offered in Cuba in order to supply the deficiencies which now exist. I can therefore take no further steps in the three cases still open until further proof is taken.

I have concluded to send you the following telegram in cipher, which explains itself:

Bauriedel, Seidenberg, and Sartorius will be permitted to make further proof at Havana of their claims. Details mailed.

I am, etc.,

Hannis Taylor.
[Page 494]
[Inclosure in No. 716.—Translation.]

The Duke of Tetuan to Mr. Taylor.

Excellency: ln accordance with what I had the honor to state to you on several occasions, the Government of His Majesty has carefully examined the expedientes received from the Island of Cuba, formed on account of the claims made by several American citizens relative to the decree on the exportation of tobacco from Havana and Pinar del Rio published by General Weyler under date of May 16, 1896.

Grave and well-grounded considerations of just defense of the national interests suggested the publication of that order; but the Government of His Majesty, always respecting the rights acquired, showed itself disposed to exempt from the same those lots of tobacco which should be sufficiently proved that had been bona fide acquired or contracted for by foreigners prior to the publication of the decree. So I informed that legation in official note as soon as, after the Government of His Majesty had taken such decision, your excellency presented the first observations upon the matter, under date of May 21, 1896. Afterwards and in different notes I have had the honor to make the same statement to you. From the beginning, and as Your Excellency will remember, the case was foreseen that difference of opinions might arise as to the manner of carrying out the instructions already sent, the decisions being reserved to the agreement of both Governments.

For the purpose of putting a definitive end to this matter the Government of His Majesty, giving another proof of its special desire to please, as far as possible, that of the United States, requested the authorities of Cuba to send copies of the expedientes there formed on account of the mentioned American claims regarding the exportation of tobacco. As soon as said copies have been received by the Government it has proceeded to their study and decision with its habitual spirit of equity and justice.

Seven have been the American claimants whose expedientes have been received by His Majesty’s Government and to which yogi excellency has referred in different notes, viz: (1) Bruno Diaz, (2) Doroteo Herrera, (3) Luis Wertheimer, (4) Federico Bauriedel, (5) Seidenberg & Co., (6) Hernsheim Bros. & Co., and (7) Sartorius & Co.

Of these seven cases the first three, as your excellency knows, have been already decided by granting the permission to ship requested by the claimants. For that reason the Government of His Majesty needs not enter into the examination of their respective expedientes, and will do so exclusively in regard to the four others.

These four offered to prove that they acquired or contracted for the tobacco prior to the decree, but the only one who actually proves it with the documents presented is the claimant Hernsheim Bros. & Co., especially with those documents which your excellency was good enough to transmit as inclosures to your notes of May 15 and 21 and 4th instant, especially the letters of the buyer Fidel Fernandez, a Spaniard, which being dated prior to the decree, are truly convincing and bear effective proving power.

In view of them the Government of His Majesty, in compliance with its primitive decision contained in my note of the 25th of May last year, has ordered the Cuban authorities to permit the shipment of the 1,200 bales of tobacco the property of Messrs. Hernsheim Bros. & Co., sending the instructions by cable in order to avoid unnecessary delay.

[Page 495]

As the same circumstances do not concur in regard to the value of the proofs alleged in the three remaining cases, the decision has been necessarily different. Messrs. Bauriedel, Seidenberg, and Sartorius do not prove, but limit themselves to offer, in one or other form that they shall prove, their assertions that they acquired or contracted for the tobacco prior to the decree. For this purpose and in accordance with their offers it will be necessary to open an investigation by means of the examination of the commercial books, correspondence, memoranda, notes, confirmation of drafts, depositions of the sellers, buyers, and selecters, and other means which may be considered proper; the purpose of which investigation will be to clear the facts and to purge them with a severity excluding good faith, equity, and justice. This investigation shall be made at Havana, because neither in the expedientes nor in the documents sent by your excellency appear sufficient evidence to appreciate duly the proofs offered and reasons alleged. According to the result of the investigation the permission for shipment shall be given or not, it being understood that before said shipment is permitted it is necessary to demonstrate that the tobacco is the same one which was acquired or contracted for prior to the decree.

As regards the case of Messrs. Bauriedel & Co., the investigation shall refer, not to the total quantity originally requested, but only to the 5,000 bales of tobacco, these being the only ones they offer to prove, in a petition of September 10, 1896, that were acquired or contracted for prior to the decree.

Resuming, the Government of His Majesty, after making a careful study of the respective expedientes and of the documents submitted by your excellency, has decided—

  • First. To authorize the immediate shipment of the 1,200 bales of tobacco requested by Messrs. Hernsheim Bros. & Co., of New Orleans, issuing to this end the proper orders by cable.
  • Second. To order the Treasury authorities of the Island of Cuba to make the proposed investigations or those which may be considered necessary to prove whether Messrs. Bauriedel, Seidenberg, and Sartorius acquired or contracted for, bona fide, prior to the order, the respective amounts of 5,000, 600, and 750 bales of tobacco, which they desire to ship, and if they are the same which they acquired or contracted for prior to the decree. The matter of the permission to ship shall be decided according to the result of the proof.

As your excellency will see, the decision of the Government of His Majesty is inspired both in the equity and justice promised, which is the constant feature of its conduct, and in a desire to please as far as it can that of the United States, thus answering to the friendly sentiments uniting both countries.

Said decision is very specially based upon the last documents presented by your excellency in official notes, some of them of a very recent date, and upon the express text of the depositions presented by the claimants. The Government of His Majesty has acted with as much dispatch as circumstances permitted since the receipt of your note of the 24th of March last, ordering the remission of the expedientes from the Island of Cuba and keeping them in its hands only the time indispensable for their examination. If the exportation is only permitted in one case, it is because that is the only one in which the assertion of the bona fide acquisition prior to the order is confirmed: and this is due, not to the documents presented by the claimant at Havana, but to those submitted by your excellency in your notes, the last of which was of the 4th instant. The Government of His Majesty [Page 496] could not be, therefore, more solicitous, contrasting its rapid action with the scanty diligence employed by the claimants.

The latter, instead of using the right of administrative appeal granted by the Spanish law, and which would have enabled the central Government to decide the matter much sooner, preferred to go to-the-diplomatic channel, slower and less adequate, thus bringing about delays and annoyances imputable only to the claimants, and for which the Government of His Majesty can not answer at all, as I had the honor to state to your excellency in my note of April 24 of the present year.

Of that fault and of the delay with which the parties interested have presented the documents of proof may have originated losses, in case they have existed; and as of them His Majesty’s Government has not been the cause, it can not admit the existence of any right to indemnity, as that claimed without sufficient ground by Messrs. Sartorius & Co. I must therefore so inform your excellency, hoping that the Government of the United States will appreciate in their full value the reasons exposed, which, being based upon strict justice, will not fail to merit its approval and respect.

After the claims of American subjects in regard to the decree of May 16, 1896, have been definitively decided in the manner above set forth, and the refusal to admit, any demand for indemnity which on that account might be presented has been justified, it only rests for me to state to your excellency my conviction that in view of the time elapsed no new claims may be presented with foundation, since it is more than a year that the exportation of tobacco from Havana and Pinar del Rio has been prohibited, and therefore there has been ample time for the presentation of complaints of those who should consider their interests injured. The Government of His Majesty, for this reason, has the pleasure of considering this matter as definitively ended.

I avail myself, etc.,

The Duke of Tetuan.