Mr. Breckinridge to Mr. Sherman.

No. 596.]

Sir: Referring to your No. 429 of June 18, with inclosures, concerning the laws and regulations of the Russian Government affecting the visés of passports of our citizens of Hebrew origin, and to other controverted matters, I have the honor to inclose my note of July 20 to Count Mouravieff.

[Page 444]

These matters have been the occasion also of verbal discussion with the foreign office. I am not prepared, however, to say more at present than to state in general terms that what has passed has been well received, the reasonableness of the Department’s suggestions have been unofficially concurred in, and that there is ground for hope that progress will be made upon lines so reasonable and consistent as those proposed.

I have, etc.,

Clifton R. Breckinridge.
[Inclosure in No. 596.]

Mr. Breckinridge to Count Mouravieff.

Your Excellency: Referring to my note of June 27/July 9, in which I had the honor to express assurance of the satisfaction of my Government at the generous recognition by the Imperial Government of the mitigating conditions in the case of Mr. Grenz, a Russian subject who became an American citizen without the consent of the Imperial Government, and his acquittal in accordance therewith, I now have the honor to say that I am in receipt of a dispatch from my Government fully expressing its sentiments in regard to that and kindred matters.

My Government charges me to make known to the Imperial Government that while recognizing the extreme doctrinal differences which arise from different historical traditions, it yet appreciates and reciprocates the sentiment of consideration and respect which has been shown. It is pleased to recognize the good disposition shown by the administrative and judicial authorities of the Empire, in accordance with its established laws and practice toward personally deserving persons of conflicting allegiance.

It is noted that it was in this spirit of reasonable accommodation and mutual respect which enabled the two Governments, after many failures through a long series of years, to at length agree upon a convention of extradition; and it is believed that the same spirit, so historically maintained, will continue to ameliorate and remove the practical differences which may exist or occasionally arise in the course of the growth and increasing intercourse between the two nations.

Concerning the matter of travel and convenience of citizens about whose nationality there is no question, but of the Jewish race which is subject to special regulations within the Empire, the same dispatch desires me to call attention to a practice by the Imperial officials abroad, which is objectionable and seemingly not at all required by the laws of the Empire.

In this connection I beg to cite the note to this legation of His Excellency Prince Lobanoff, dated June 26/July 8, 1895, and a note from the same to the same, dated August 12/24, 1895. In these communications, accompanied by an extract of the Russian law upon the subject, his excellency stated that in the case of a Jewish banker, chief of a commercial house, and certain other enumerated classes of business men of known importance of the Hebrew race the Imperial legations and consulates were authorized to issue and vise passports for them to enter Russia according to the same regulations which apply to all foreigners [Page 445] who seek to enter the Empire, the only condition being that the acting official shall inform his excellency, the minister of the interior, of any passport granted or viséd for an Israelite of the category named.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provision of the law, it seems that the Imperial officials hesitate to act in the manner indicated. A number of cases of this character have recently been brought to the attention of my Government, and it believes that by simply amending the practice stated, and in accordance with existing law, a great inconvenience to this unobjectionable category of our citizens can be relieved, and the irritating incidents arising therefrom can be obviated.

There is no difficulty in the United States of any citizen of the category named (and there can be but little difficulty with such persons applying for a visé abroad) in giving satisfactory commercial or official evidence of his identity and character. So I submit this feature to your excellency with the hope that it may be acceptable.

I avail myself, etc.,

Clifton R. Breckinridge.