No. 355.
Mr. Blaine to Sir Edward
Thornton.
Washington , March 9, 1881.
Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 7th instant, addressed to my predecessor, in response to his note of the same day to you on the subject of the alleged prevalence of hog-cholera in the Western States.
While most fully appreciating your promptness and courtesy in taking such energetic steps to investigate the authority for the strange announcement made by Mr. Crump, late acting consul of Her Majesty at Philadelphia, I regret that the further report on the subject looked for by you from the consul at Philadelphia should not have yet been communicated to this Department, in view of the urgency of the matter.
Confirming the statement Mr. Evarts’ note of the 7th that all means of information at the command of the Department concurred in showing the late published report as wholly without foundation, I hasten to transmit copies of resolutions of the Merchants’ Exchange of Saint Louis, and of the Chamber of Commerce of Cincinnati.
I am also, to-day, in receipt of a communication from my colleague, the Secretary of the Treasury, conveying explicit denial of the report published in the Times, and asking that the character and source of the [Page 581] information on which Mr. Crump’s dispatch was based be ascertained. It may be that, as stated in the telegram you have received from the consulate at Philadelphia, credence has been given to what appeared to be “good authority”; but all that this government can learn, after searching inquiry, leads irresistibly to the conclusion that the good faith of Her Majesty’s representative at Philadelphia has been imposed upon by designing speculators, in their own selfish interests, and to the incalculable injury of legitimate commerce.
Should this be so, I trust you will concur with me that no steps can be too urgent or imperative to overtake and contradict this false statement, and that this government cannot too confidently look to Her Majesty’s legation for an authoritative denial thereof.
I have, &c.,