No. 187.

Baron Gerolt to Mr. Fish.

Sir: In obedience to a dispatch from Count Bismarck, of the 4th instant, received yesterday, I have the honor to submit to you the inclosed copy, with translation, of a memorial in regard to the fatal consequences which unavoidably must follow if the inhabitants of Paris, or rather those who exercise the power in that city, should continue in their resistance [Page 232] to the moment when the want of provisions will compel them to surrender.

Count Bismarck expresses the deep regret of the belligerent German governments that these consequences cannot be avoided by them, feeling obliged to declare that they are not responsible for the unavoidable misery to come, and that they must leave such responsibility to those who, by continual instigation and false reports, excite the population of Paris to a useless resistance, when a moment of cool reflection could save them.

FR. V. GEROLT.
[Translation.]

The conditions of an armistice offered to M. Jules Favre, intended as the basis for the reëstablishment of order in France, have been rejected by him and his colleagues. They thereby decree the continuation of a struggle which, according to the course of late events, appears without any chance of success for the French people. Since then the prospects of France in this war, so full of sacrifices, have still further declined. Toul and Strasburg have fallen; Paris is closely surrounded, and German troops are advancing along the Loire. The large forces before engaged near the above fortresses are now at the free disposal of the German commanders.

The country has to bear the consequences of a war, “à outrance,” decreed by the French authorities in Paris. Its sacrifices will be unnecessarily increased, and its social condition suffer a more and more dangerous decomposition.

The command of the German armies does not find itself in a situation to counteract this, but it perceives clearly the consequences of the resistance chosen by the powers in France, and feels compelled to call general attention to one point, namely, the special condition of Paris.

The heaviest attacks heretofore made from this capital, (on the 19th and 30th of last month,) in which the elite of the armies collected in that city have not been able to throw back the first line of the besieging force, lead to the conviction that the capital will fall sooner or later. If the time of surrender is postponed by the “provisional government for the national defense” until the threatening want of provisions necessitates a capitulation, the most terrible results must follow.

The unwise destruction of railways, bridges, and canals at a certain distance around Paris by the French has not been able to stop for one moment the advance of the German armies. All communications by land or water needed for military operations have been reestablished in a very short time. These repairs naturally regard military interests exclusively, while the other destructions, even after a capitulation, will prevent for a long time the communication of the capital with the provinces.

It will be an absolute impossibility for the German commanders, when that case occurs, to provide one single day’s rations for a population of nearly two millions. The environs of Paris, to the distance of several days’ journey, since all stores there are necessarily required for the use of the German troops, will then offer no resources, and will not permit the inhabitants of Paris to evacuate by the roads into the country. The inevitable result would be the starvation of hundreds of thousands. The persons in power in France cannot fail to discern these consequences as clearly as the German commanders, and since to the latter nothing is left but to carry on the war proffered, the rulers of France are responsible for forcing such extremes.