286. Letter From President Carter to Pakistani Chief Martial Law Administrator Zia1
Your letter of May 9 was very helpful in sharpening my understanding of Pakistan’s position in South Asia.2 I have also profited from the valuable insights that Ambassador Hummel has gained from his talks with you, and that Secretary Vance has added from his meeting with Mr. Agha Shahi.3
Both you and I view events in Afghanistan with a similar concern for the effect that they may have on the region’s security. I share your concern with the political antecedents of the new Afghan leaders, and am equally disturbed by their past statements concerning the Durand [Page 683] line.4 We agree fully that Soviet domination of Afghanistan would be a development of great seriousness for South Asia and the entire free world. Those of us who share this view must cooperate closely over the coming weeks and months.
We are under no illusions about the difficulties that may arise. We must be careful to avoid actions which could seemingly provide justification for those who seek to worsen the situation and limit the government’s chances of maintaining independence. When faced by changes that may indeed be of a historic scope, it is important that we all act with forethought and determination.
The new Afghan government has declared its intention to remain non-aligned. Your decision to maintain contact in order to test its willingness to continue constructive foreign policies is a wise one. I, too, intend to pursue this course as a first step, and hope we can work together in trying to hold the Kabul leadership to its promise. Given these similarities in our approach, I will value continued close contact so that we can most carefully assess what the next steps should be.
There are a number of other matters on which I feel we can both profit from a further exchange of views. I know that you too have been troubled by issues which have arisen between our two countries. Secretary Vance has explained to Mr. Agha Shahi the real legal and political hurdles placed in our way by Pakistan’s plans to acquire a reprocessing plant. While recognizing these difficulties, I urge that we both keep clear in our minds the long-range interests and concerns which underlie our relationship.
For my part, I share the conviction both of my predecessors and yours that our relationship is important to each of our nations. With this lasting perspective in mind, we will be better able to solve the immediate problems that stand between us, and build upon the fundamental consensus that binds us. I am determined to do everything within my power to continue developing our historic relationship of cooperation and friendship.
I believe, as you do, that a personal meeting would be helpful. It would be especially fruitful after we assess the exchange of ideas between Secretary Vance and Mr. Agha Shahi, and after we have some [Page 684] clearer knowledge of the attitude of the new government in Afghanistan.
In the meantime, I suggest that we keep in touch through Ambassador Hummel and, as needed, through direct correspondence. Once again, I thank you for sharing your thoughts with me; I hope you will continue to do so on this and other matters.
Sincerely,
- Source: Carter Library, National Security Affairs, Brzezinski Material, President’s Correspondence with Foreign Leaders File, Box 15, Pakistan: President Zia-ul-Haq, 2/78–7/79. No classification marking.↩
- See footnote 2, Document 279.↩
- See Document 281 and footnote 2, Document 285.↩
- According to telegram 4630 from Islamabad, May 10: “Paragraph 8 of the ruling Khalq Party’s manifesto issued in October 1977, specifically mentions the Durand Line, the recognized international frontier between Pakistan and Afghanistan, as a ‛colonial imposition’ and pledges support to the so-called ‛national movement of the people of Pakhtoonistan’ in our territory. In his very first press conference on May 6, 1978, the new Afghan President raised the matter of the Durand Line saying, of course, that he wanted a peaceful settlement of this border issue with Pakistan.” (National Archives, RG 59, Central Foreign Policy File, D780197–1239)↩